Synopsis |
|
xv | |
1 The background |
|
1 | |
|
1.1 Introduction to the project |
|
|
1 | |
|
1.2 Reflections on methodology |
|
|
4 | |
|
1.3 Introducing the rationality constraint |
|
|
9 | |
|
1.3.1 Interpretation and rationality |
|
|
10 | |
|
1.3.2 Features of beliefs |
|
|
11 | |
|
1.3.3 Rationality for beliefs |
|
|
14 | |
|
1.3.4 The rationality constraint on belief ascription |
|
|
18 | |
|
1.4 Introducing delusions |
|
|
21 | |
|
1.4.1 Definitions of delusions |
|
|
23 | |
|
|
27 | |
|
1.4.3 The two-factor theory |
|
|
31 | |
|
1.4.4 Delusions and self deception |
|
|
37 | |
|
1.4.5 Delusions and obsessive thoughts |
|
|
41 | |
|
1.4.6 Delusions and confabulations |
|
|
43 | |
|
1.4.7 Delusions and hypnotically induced beliefs |
|
|
50 | |
|
1.4.8 Delusions and irrational beliefs |
|
|
55 | |
|
|
59 | |
2 Procedural rationality and belief ascription |
|
61 | |
|
2.1 Bad integration in delusions |
|
|
62 | |
|
2.1.1 Bad integration and meaning |
|
|
64 | |
|
2.1.2 Dissonance and double-bookkeeping |
|
|
68 | |
|
2.1.3 Delusions as imaginings or alternative realities |
|
|
73 | |
|
2.2 Bad integration in beliefs |
|
|
77 | |
|
2.2.1 Preference reversals |
|
|
79 | |
|
2.2.2 Beliefs about the probability of events |
|
|
82 | |
|
|
84 | |
|
2.3 Recovery after 'Socratic tutoring' |
|
|
86 | |
|
2.3.1 Restoring rationality |
|
|
86 | |
|
2.3.2 Excuses for bad integration |
|
|
88 | |
|
2.3.3 Subscription to norms of rationality |
|
|
90 | |
|
2.3.4 Charity and explicability |
|
|
92 | |
|
2.4 The indeterminacy argument |
|
|
96 | |
|
2.4.1 Delusions and interpretation |
|
|
97 | |
|
2.4.2 Two notions of rationality |
|
|
99 | |
|
2.4.3 Interpreting in the real world |
|
|
102 | |
|
2.4.4 Heuristics versus constraints |
|
|
107 | |
|
|
109 | |
3 Epistemic rationality and belief ascription |
|
113 | |
|
3.1 Delusions and epistemic rationality |
|
|
115 | |
|
|
116 | |
|
3.1.2 Anti-doxastic arguments: delusions aren't probable explanations |
|
|
118 | |
|
3.1.3 Anti-doxastic arguments: delusions aren't responsive to evidence |
|
|
121 | |
|
3.2 Delusions and faulty reasoning |
|
|
125 | |
|
3.2.1 Empiricism and evidential support |
|
|
126 | |
|
3.2.2 Competence versus performance |
|
|
128 | |
|
3.2.3 Jumping to conclusions |
|
|
133 | |
|
3.2.4 Attributional biases: me and others |
|
|
135 | |
|
3.2.5 Resisting counterevidence |
|
|
138 | |
|
3.3 Badly supported beliefs |
|
|
140 | |
|
3.3.1 Beliefs about causes |
|
|
140 | |
|
3.3.2 Beliefs about intentions |
|
|
143 | |
|
3.3.3 Self-serving beliefs |
|
|
146 | |
|
|
148 | |
|
|
149 | |
|
3.4.2 Religious beliefs and religious delusions |
|
|
152 | |
|
|
153 | |
|
|
154 | |
4 Agential rationality and belief ascription |
|
159 | |
|
4.1 Delusions and failure of action guidance |
|
|
161 | |
|
4.1.1 Are delusions action guiding? |
|
|
162 | |
|
4.1.2 Are delusions acceptances? |
|
|
167 | |
|
4.2 Beliefs and failure of action guidance |
|
|
171 | |
|
|
172 | |
|
4.2.2 Poor self prediction |
|
|
173 | |
|
4.3 Delusions and failure of reason-giving |
|
|
175 | |
|
4.3.1 Authorship and agential rationality |
|
|
176 | |
|
4.3.2 Are delusions authored? |
|
|
178 | |
|
4.3.3 Giving reasons: deliberation and justification |
|
|
183 | |
|
4.4 Delusions and framework beliefs |
|
|
187 | |
|
4.4.1 Can we author framework beliefs? |
|
|
188 | |
|
4.4.2 Are delusions framework beliefs? |
|
|
190 | |
|
4.4.3 Do delusions conflict with framework beliefs? |
|
|
193 | |
|
4.4.4 Can framework beliefs be justified and revised? |
|
|
195 | |
|
4.5 Beliefs and failure of reason-giving |
|
|
197 | |
|
4.5.1 Bad reasons for attitudes |
|
|
198 | |
|
|
201 | |
|
|
203 | |
5 Beliefs and self knowledge |
|
207 | |
|
5.1 Authorship and first-person authority |
|
|
209 | |
|
5.1.1 Routes to knowledge of the self |
|
|
210 | |
|
5.1.2 The deliberative stance |
|
|
212 | |
|
5.1.3 Authorship challenged |
|
|
214 | |
|
5.1.4 Rationality and stability of attitudes |
|
|
217 | |
|
|
219 | |
|
|
222 | |
|
|
225 | |
|
|
227 | |
|
5.2.1 What is thought insertion? |
|
|
228 | |
|
5.2.2 Thought insertion as a failure of ownership |
|
|
231 | |
|
5.2.3 Thought insertion as a failure of endorsement |
|
|
235 | |
|
|
242 | |
|
5.3.1 Self narratives: truth or fiction? |
|
|
242 | |
|
5.3.2 Delusions: bad scientific theories or unreliable autobiographies? |
|
|
247 | |
|
5.3.3 Mental time travel and agency |
|
|
250 | |
|
5.3.4 Coherence versus correspondence |
|
|
253 | |
|
|
256 | |
6 Conclusions |
|
259 | |
|
|
259 | |
|
|
261 | |
|
6.2.1 Beliefs are integrated in a system and have some inferential relations with other intentional states |
|
|
262 | |
|
6.2.2 Beliefs are sensitive to evidence or argument |
|
|
262 | |
|
6.2.3 Beliefs can be manifested in behaviour |
|
|
264 | |
|
6.2.4 Beliefs can be self ascribed and some beliefs can be defended with reasons |
|
|
264 | |
Bibliography and reference list |
|
267 | |
Index |
|
295 | |