Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Inhabitable Flesh of Architecture [Minkštas viršelis]

  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 268 pages, aukštis x plotis: 240x220 mm, weight: 839 g
  • Serija: Design Research in Architecture
  • Išleidimo metai: 31-Dec-2013
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 1409469344
  • ISBN-13: 9781409469346
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 268 pages, aukštis x plotis: 240x220 mm, weight: 839 g
  • Serija: Design Research in Architecture
  • Išleidimo metai: 31-Dec-2013
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 1409469344
  • ISBN-13: 9781409469346
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Today’s architecture has failed the body with its long heritage of purity of form and aesthetic of cleanliness. A resurgence of interest in flesh, especially in art, has led to a politics of abjection, completely changing traditional aesthetics, and is now giving light to an alternative discussion about the body in architecture. This book is dedicated to a future vision of the body in architecture, questioning the contemporary relationship between our Human Flesh and the changing Architectural Flesh. Through the analysis and design of a variety of buildings and projects, Flesh is proposed as a concept that extends the meaning of skin, one of architecture’s most fundamental metaphors. It seeks to challenge a common misunderstanding of skin as a flat and thin surface. In a time when a pervasive discourse about the impact of digital technologies risks turning the architectural skin ever more disembodied, this book argues for a thick embodied flesh by exploring architectural interfaces that are truly inhabitable. Different concepts of Flesh are investigated, not only concerning the architectural and aesthetic, but also the biological aspects. The latter is materialised in form of Synthetic Neoplasms, which are proposed as new semi-living entities, rather than more commonly derived from scaled-up analogies between biological systems and larger scale architectural constructs. These ’neoplasmatic’ creations are identified as partly designed object and partly living material, in which the line between the natural and the artificial is progressively blurred. Hybrid technologies and interdisciplinary work methodologies are thus required, and lead to a revision of our current architectural practice.

Recenzijos

Recently in many architectural schools efforts intensified to further develop architectural research. Exciting new avenues are being explored, relying upon the design skills of architects and urban designers, combining them with intellectual rigor and in-depth thinking, in order to imagine new spatialities and to unfold hitherto unknown spatial experiences. This series highlights the innovative results of these explorations, opening up a new world of path-breaking research. Hilde Heynen, University of Leuven, Belgium

List of Images (According to their provenance)
xi
Acknowledgements xvii
Photo Acknowledgements xix
Introduction: Body and Flesh 1(34)
I.1 Preliminary Design Experiments
1(1)
I.2 Influences from Biology and the Medical Sciences
2(1)
I.3 From Biology as a Model to Biology as a Hybrid Discipline
3(1)
I.4 Flesh as an Extended Meaning of Skin
4(6)
I.5 Different Body Conceptions
10(13)
I.5.1 The Classical Body
10(1)
I.5.2 The Grotesque Body
10(1)
I.5.3 The Bourgeois Body
11(4)
I.5.4 The Modern Body
15(2)
I.5.5 The Cyborgian Body
17(6)
I.6 Sections
23(5)
I.7 Research by Design
28(1)
I.8 Three-dimensional Structure
29(6)
Design Experiment I Hyperdermis/Walls for Communicating People
35(156)
Section I Disgusting Flesh
41(26)
S1.1 Bourgeois at Eccentric Abstraction
41(2)
S1.2 Bourdieu's `Taste of Reflection'
43(1)
S1.3 The Rise of `Good Taste' and `Good Design'
44(1)
S1.4 Flesh and Disgust
45(1)
S1.5 Flesh out of Place
46(1)
S1.6 The Double Meaning of Disgust
47(1)
S1.7 Disgust as a Social Construct
48(1)
S1.8 Disgusting Materiality: Miller's Inorganic versus Organic; Plant versus Animal; Animal versus Human
48(2)
S1.9 Flesh is Fat, Skin is Slim
50(1)
S1.10 Miller's `Inside of Me' versus `Outside of Me'
50(2)
S1.11 Our Human-Animal Relationship with Flesh
52(1)
S1.12 Miller's Me' versus `You' and `Us' versus `Them'
53(1)
S1.13 Disgusting Skin
53(2)
S1.14 Feeling Disgust through Touch
55(1)
S1.15 The Attraction of Disgust
56(1)
S1.16 Bourgeois's Environments
57(1)
S1.16.1 The Destruction of the Father
58(2)
S1.16.2 The Confrontation
60(3)
S1.17 Conclusion
63(4)
Section II Inhabitable Interfaces
67(92)
S2.1 Introduction
67(1)
S2.2 Interfaces: an Extended Meaning of Walls
67(4)
S2.3 Walls as Dividers; Walls as Unifiers
71(3)
S2.4 Inhabitable Walls are not Service Cores
74(1)
S2.5 Body Analogies
75(3)
S2.6 Figural Ornaments as Wall Inhabitants
78(2)
S2.7 Bourgeois Detachment: Seeking Privacy, Cleanliness and Social Order
80(3)
S2.8 Domenech i Montaner's Inhabitable Facades
83(3)
S2.9 Loos's Inhabitable Mask
86(2)
S2.10 From `Wall-art' to Interior Cleanliness
88(2)
S2.11 Neutra's Affective Environments
90(3)
S2.12 Wright, Schindler and Lautner's Built-ins
93(3)
S2.13 Moore's `Climbing-the-Castle-Phenomenon'
96(1)
S2.14 Intimate Walls: The Attraction of Mysterious walls
97(2)
S2.15 Technologized Walls and Chareau's Appliance Walls
99(3)
S2.16 Dallegret's Inhabitable Appliances
102(1)
S2.17 The Smithsons' Inhabitable Cubicles
102(4)
S2.18 1960s Wallism; Webb's Deployable Suits; Inhabitable Capsules
106(3)
S2.19 Wearable Walls
109(1)
S2.20 Marcosnandmarjan's Inhabitable Lofts
110(3)
S2.21 Comparative Analysis
113(35)
S2.21.1 Le Corbusier's Spiritual Walls (with Confessionals)
120(6)
S2.21.2 Utzon's Inhabitable Exhibition Cones
126(1)
S2.21.3 Rogers and Piano's Inhabitable Media Facade
127(1)
S2.21.4 Ito's Inhabitable Columns
128(4)
S2.21.5 Scott Cohen's Inhabitable Circulation Tubes
132(1)
S2.21.6 Cook and Fournier's Inhabitable Skin
132(5)
S2.21.7 Other Design Experiments
137(1)
S2.21.7.1 Cruz's Inhabitable Hairy Wall
137(1)
S2.21.7.2 Marcosandmarjan's Inhabitable Lab Cones
138(1)
S2.21.7.3 Marcosandmarjan's Inhabitable Exhibition Vessels
138(5)
S2.21.7.4 Marcosandmarjan's Inhabitable Voids
143(2)
S2.21.7.5 Marcosandmarjan's Inhabitable DJ Capsule
145(1)
S2.21.7.6 Marcosandmarjan's Inhabitable Trusses
145(3)
S2.22 Conclusion
148(11)
Section III Synthetic Neoplasms
159(32)
S3.1 Introduction
159(1)
S3.2 Cronenberg's eXistenZ
159(1)
S3.3 Neoplasms are not Blobs
160(1)
S3.4 `Formless' Form
160(2)
S3.5 Hybrid Creatures - Synthetic Neoplasms
162(6)
S3.6 Networked Neoplasms - Inhabitable Bodies
168(2)
S3.7 The Neoplasms' Complexion: Flesh and Skin
170(2)
S3.8 Genderless Skin
172(1)
S3.9 Colourless Skin
172(3)
S3.10 Naked Skin
175(1)
S3.11 Touching Skin
176(1)
S3.12 Inlucent Skin
177(1)
S3.13 Ugly Neoplasms
178(3)
S3.14 Conclusion: Neoplasmatic Architecture
181(10)
S3.14.1 Kunsthaus Graz
181(10)
Design Experiment (Final Stage): Hyperdermis Cyborgian Interfaces
191(8)
Conclusion 199(4)
Bibliographic References 203(20)
Index 223
Marcos Cruz is Director of the Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL, UK.