Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance: Analyzing IANA Transition 1st ed. 2021 [Kietas viršelis]

,
  • Formatas: Hardback, 156 pages, aukštis x plotis: 210x148 mm, weight: 454 g, 2 Illustrations, color; 1 Illustrations, black and white; XVII, 156 p. 3 illus., 2 illus. in color., 1 Hardback
  • Serija: Information Technology and Global Governance
  • Išleidimo metai: 07-Nov-2020
  • Leidėjas: Springer Nature Switzerland AG
  • ISBN-10: 3030561305
  • ISBN-13: 9783030561307
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Legitimacy, Power, and Inequalities in the Multistakeholder Internet Governance: Analyzing IANA Transition 1st ed. 2021Didesnis paveikslėlis
  • Formatas: Hardback, 156 pages, aukštis x plotis: 210x148 mm, weight: 454 g, 2 Illustrations, color; 1 Illustrations, black and white; XVII, 156 p. 3 illus., 2 illus. in color., 1 Hardback
  • Serija: Information Technology and Global Governance
  • Išleidimo metai: 07-Nov-2020
  • Leidėjas: Springer Nature Switzerland AG
  • ISBN-10: 3030561305
  • ISBN-13: 9783030561307
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Pastovi nuoroda: https://www.kriso.lt/db/9783030561307.html
Raktažodžiai:

This book aims to develop a critical understanding of multistakeholder governance in Internet Governance through an in-depth analysis of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) transition, the process through which the U.S. Government transferred its traditional oversight role over the Domain Name System to the global Internet community. In the last few decades, multistakeholderism has become the dominant discourse in the Internet Governance field, mainly because of its promise to provide democratic legitimacy for transnational policymaking, although empirical research has highlighted disappointing performances of multistakeholder arrangements. This book contributes to the debate on multistakeholder governance by analyzing the IANA Transition process's normative legitimacy, broken down in the dimensions of input legitimacy (inclusiveness, balanced representation, and representativeness), throughput legitimacy (procedural and discursive quality), and output legitimacy (outcome and institutional effectiveness). Findings warn about the risk that multistakeholderism could result in a misleading rhetoric legitimizing existing power asymmetries.


1 Introduction: The IANA Transition and Internet Multistakeholder Governance
1(20)
1.1 Multistakeholderism in Internet Governance
3(6)
1.2 The Discursive Nature of Multistakeholderism: Performing Narrative or Misleading Rhetoric?
9(5)
1.3 Structure of the Book
14(7)
References
16(5)
2 Foundations, Pitfalls, and Assessment of Multistakeholder Governance
21(22)
2.1 Establishing Legitimate Authority for Transnational Governance: The Promise of Multistakeholderism
22(4)
2.2 Structural Pitfalls of Multistakeholder Governance
26(5)
2.3 A Framework to Assess the Legitimacy of Multistakeholder Initiatives
31(12)
References
38(5)
3 IANA Functions, ICANN, and the DNS War
43(20)
3.1 The Domain Name System and IANA Functions
43(3)
3.2 From Technical Governance to Governance by Contract
46(5)
3.3 The Internationalization of the DNS and the Multistakeholder Model
51(2)
3.4 The Evolution of ICANN Governance Structure
53(10)
References
58(5)
4 The Institutional Design of the IANA Transition Process
63(18)
4.1 The Preparatory Phase
64(6)
4.2 The Drafting of the IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal
70(6)
4.2.1 The Name Proposal
71(3)
4.2.2 The Number and Protocol Proposal
74(1)
4.2.3 The Assembled Proposal
75(1)
4.3 The Drafting of the Enhancing ICANN Accountability Recommendations
76(3)
4.4 Approval and Implementation by the ICANN Board and NTIA
79(2)
5 The Input Legitimacy of the IANA Transition Process
81(22)
5.1 Analyzing Input Legitimacy: Objectives, Data, and Methods
82(4)
5.2 Inclusiveness and Balanced Representation
86(4)
5.3 Representativeness, Revolving Doors, and Blurring Boundaries Among Stakeholders' Groups
90(6)
5.4 Power Relationship in the "Small World" of the IANA Transition Network
96(7)
References
100(3)
6 The Throughput Legitimacy of the IANA Transition Process
103(24)
6.1 The Procedural Quality of the IANA Transition
104(6)
6.2 Discursive Quality
110(17)
6.2.1 Theoretical and Methodological Notes
110(2)
6.2.2 The Discussion on Post-transition Oversight Arrangements
112(4)
6.2.3 Evaluating Deliberativeness and Discourse Balance
116(7)
References
123(4)
7 The Output Legitimacy of the IANA Transition Process
127(16)
7.1 Output Legitimacy in Constituent Policy-Making
127(2)
7.2 Institutional Effectiveness: The New ICANN Bylaws
129(6)
7.3 Outcome Effectiveness: A Still Contested DNS Regime
135(8)
7.3.1 National DNSs: The 2019 Russian Sovereign Internet Law
135(2)
7.3.2 The Territorial Jurisdiction of ICANN: The Case of the org TLD
137(4)
References
141(2)
8 Conclusion: The Misleading Rhetoric of Multistakeholderism
143
References
156
Nicola Palladino is a research fellow at the Department of Political and Social Studies, University of Salerno, Italy, where he works at the Internet & Communication Policy Center. He has taken part in several national and international research projects on Internet Governance, Internet Policy and Digital Constitutionalism processes.





Mauro Santaniello is a researcher at the Department of Political and Social Studies, University of Salerno, Italy, where he teaches Internet Governance and Digital Policy. He is a co-founder and vice director of the Internet & Communication Policy Center. He has led several research groups on Internet Governance and Policy.