Foreword 1st Edition |
|
xi | |
Foreword 2nd Edition |
|
xiii | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xv | |
Notation |
|
xvii | |
Acronyms |
|
xxiii | |
Glossary of terms |
|
xxv | |
1 Introduction |
|
|
1.1 Context and motivation for book |
|
|
1 | (5) |
|
1.2 Scope of book and introduction to the CES-AES |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
1.3 Limitations of the CES-AES |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
1.5 Origin of the CES-AES |
|
|
10 | (5) |
2 Practical and theoretical issues in channel hydraulics |
|
15 | (78) |
|
2.1 Getting started with some practical examples on calculating flows in watercourses |
|
|
15 | (9) |
|
2.2 Common difficulties in modelling flow in rivers and watercourses |
|
|
24 | (21) |
|
2.2.1 Modelling flow in rivers and watercourses |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Schematisation of channel geometry |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
2.2.3 Roughness and resistance |
|
|
29 | (4) |
|
2.2.4 Energy and friction slopes |
|
|
33 | (4) |
|
2.2.5 Velocity distributions and implications for 1-D modelling |
|
|
37 | (5) |
|
2.2.6 Hydraulic structures and controls |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
2.2.7 Calibration data for river models |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
2.3 Flow in simple engineered channels |
|
|
45 | (12) |
|
2.3.1 Flows in rectangular channels |
|
|
50 | (4) |
|
2.3.2 Flows in trapezoidal channels |
|
|
54 | (3) |
|
2.4 Inbank flow in natural rivers |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
2.5 Overbank flow in natural and engineered rivers |
|
|
59 | (10) |
|
2.5.1 Overbank flow in an engineered river |
|
|
60 | (4) |
|
2.5.2 Overbank flow in a natural river |
|
|
64 | (5) |
|
2.6 Flows through bridges and culverts |
|
|
69 | (18) |
|
2.6.1 Flows through bridges and contractions |
|
|
69 | (8) |
|
2.6.2 Flows through culverts |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
2.6.3 Head-discharge and afflux relationships |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
2.6.4 Geometrical parameters affecting flow through bridges |
|
|
78 | (9) |
|
2.7 Data sources used in this book |
|
|
87 | (6) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (5) |
3 Understanding roughness, conveyance and afflux |
|
93 | (90) |
|
3.1 Flow structures in open channel flow |
|
|
93 | (12) |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
3.1.2 Vertical interfacial shear |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
3.1.3 Transverse currents |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
3.1.4 Coherent structures |
|
|
97 | (3) |
|
3.1.5 Horizontal interfacial shear |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
3.1.6 Vorticity in rivers |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
3.1.7 Special features near structures |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
|
105 | (56) |
|
3.2.1 Roughness Advisor methods |
|
|
105 | (5) |
|
3.2.2 Conveyance Estimation System methods |
|
|
110 | (19) |
|
3.2.3 Summary of CES methods, outputs and solution technique |
|
|
129 | (9) |
|
3.2.4 Backwater calculation methods |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
3.2.5 Afflux Estimation System methods |
|
|
140 | (21) |
|
3.3 Dealing with uncertainty |
|
|
161 | (8) |
|
3.3.1 Introduction to uncertainty |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Risk, uncertainty, accuracy and error |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 Components of uncertainty in the CES |
|
|
163 | (3) |
|
3.3.4 Representation and assessment of uncertainty |
|
|
166 | (3) |
|
3.4 Introduction to the CES-AES software |
|
|
169 | (14) |
|
3.4.1 Introduction to the Roughness Advisor |
|
|
171 | (4) |
|
3.4.2 Introduction to the Conveyance Generator |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
3.4.3 Introduction to the Backwater Module |
|
|
175 | (3) |
|
3.4.4 Introduction to the Afflux Estimation System |
|
|
178 | (5) |
4 Practical issues - roughness, conveyance and afflux |
|
183 | (72) |
|
4.1 An overview of the CES-AES use in practice |
|
|
183 | (6) |
|
4.1.1 Single cross-section analysis |
|
|
184 | (2) |
|
4.1.2 Single structure analysis (bridges and culverts) |
|
|
186 | (2) |
|
4.1.3 Backwater profile analysis (no structures present) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
4.1.4 Backwater profile analysis (structures present) |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
4.2 Estimating and using stage-discharge relationships and spatial velocities |
|
|
189 | (29) |
|
4.2.1 Stage-discharge prediction for the River Trent at Yoxall, Staffordshire, UK |
|
|
189 | (3) |
|
4.2.2 Stage-discharge and velocity prediction for the River Colorado, La Pampas, Argentina |
|
|
192 | (3) |
|
4.2.3 Hierarchical approach to estimating roughness (and other flow parameters) for the River Main, County Antrim, UK |
|
|
195 | (6) |
|
4.2.4 Stage-discharge, velocity and roughness predictions for the River Severn at Montford Bridge, UK |
|
|
201 | (4) |
|
4.2.5 Investigating the influence of roughness, slope and sinuosity on stage-discharge for the River La Suela, Cordoba, Argentina |
|
|
205 | (8) |
|
4.2.6 Application of the CES to a mountain stream with boulders |
|
|
213 | (5) |
|
4.3 Use of backwater module for estimating water levels along the River Main |
|
|
218 | (3) |
|
4.4 Estimating afflux at bridges |
|
|
221 | (12) |
|
4.4.1 Field scale verification of bridge backwater analysis at Pea Creek, Alabama |
|
|
221 | (6) |
|
4.4.2 Field scale bridge backwater analysis on the River Irwell, UK |
|
|
227 | (6) |
|
4.5 Estimating afflux at culverts |
|
|
233 | (10) |
|
4.5.1 Shallow culvert backwater analysis in a long reach |
|
|
233 | (2) |
|
4.5.2 Exploratory culvert design and maintenance calculations in CES-AES |
|
|
235 | (8) |
|
4.6 Dealing with vegetation and maintenance of weedy rivers |
|
|
243 | (12) |
|
4.6.1 Exploration of cutting regimes for the River Cole |
|
|
244 | (5) |
|
4.6.2 Exploration of different cutting regimes for the River Avon |
|
|
249 | (3) |
|
4.6.3 Exploration of channel deepening for the River Hooke |
|
|
252 | (3) |
5 Further issues on flows in rivers |
|
255 | (28) |
|
|
255 | (3) |
|
5.2 Sediment and geomorphological issues |
|
|
258 | (5) |
|
5.3 Trash screen and blockage issues |
|
|
263 | (3) |
|
5.4 Wider modelling issues |
|
|
266 | (10) |
|
|
266 | (7) |
|
5.4.2 Implications involved in model selection, calibration and use |
|
|
273 | (2) |
|
5.4.3 The CES-AES software in context |
|
|
275 | (1) |
|
5.5 Software architecture and calculation engines |
|
|
276 | (7) |
6 The Shiono & Knight Method (SKM) for analyzing open channel flows |
|
283 | (144) |
|
6.1 Theoretical background to the governing equation used in the SKM |
|
|
283 | (7) |
|
|
283 | (3) |
|
6.1.2 Analytical solutions |
|
|
286 | (4) |
|
a Flow in a constant depth domain with a horizontal bed (H = constant) |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
b Flow in a variable depth domain with a linear side slope |
|
|
287 | (3) |
|
6.2 Physical background to the governing equation used in the SKM |
|
|
290 | (25) |
|
6.2.1 Three-dimensional flow equations |
|
|
290 | (3) |
|
6.2.2 Three, two and one-dimensional turbulent flow equations |
|
|
293 | (3) |
|
6.2.3 Physical background to a simple turbulence model |
|
|
296 | (4) |
|
6.2.4 Vorticity and secondary flows |
|
|
300 | (15) |
|
|
301 | (2) |
|
|
303 | (12) |
|
|
315 | (12) |
|
|
317 | (1) |
|
|
318 | (3) |
|
|
321 | (3) |
|
6.3.4 Symmetric flow in a trapezoidal compound channel with a very steep internal wall |
|
|
324 | (3) |
|
6.4 Analytical solutions using the SKM |
|
|
327 | (39) |
|
6.4.1 Flows in rectangular channels |
|
|
328 | (11) |
|
6.4.2 Flows in trapezoidal channels |
|
|
339 | (18) |
|
6.4.3 Flows in compound channels |
|
|
357 | (9) |
|
6.5 Boundary shear stress distributions in channel flow and shear forces on boundary elements |
|
|
366 | (16) |
|
6.5.1 Experimental data on boundary shear stress distributions with uniform roughness |
|
|
366 | (7) |
|
6.5.2 Experimental data on boundary shear stress distributions with non-uniform roughness |
|
|
373 | (3) |
|
6.5.3 Predicting boundary shear stress using the SKM |
|
|
376 | (6) |
|
|
376 | (2) |
|
|
378 | (1) |
|
c Link between the area method and the SKM |
|
|
379 | (3) |
|
6.6 Resistance equations for surfaces, shape effects and trees |
|
|
382 | (41) |
|
6.6.1 Velocity distribution laws and resistance formulation |
|
|
383 | (6) |
|
6.6.2 Effects of cross-sectional shape on resistance |
|
|
389 | (10) |
|
6.6.3 Drag force caused by trees |
|
|
399 | (28) |
|
a Formulation of the drag force term using numerical results with experimental data |
|
|
400 | (8) |
|
b Comparison of analytical results for a constant depth domain with experimental data |
|
|
408 | (15) |
|
6.7 Flow dependent resistance issues |
|
|
423 | (4) |
7 Worked examples using the Shiono & Knight Method (SKM) |
|
427 | (60) |
|
7.1 Using Excel to solve the SKM equations together with analytical expressions for the AI coefficients |
|
|
427 | (25) |
|
7.1.1 Introduction and explanatory notes |
|
|
427 | (2) |
|
7.1.2 Inbank flows in rectangular channels |
|
|
429 | (7) |
|
7.1.3 Inbank flows in trapezoidal channels |
|
|
436 | (2) |
|
7.1.4 Inbank flows in urban drainage channels |
|
|
438 | (3) |
|
7.1.5 Overbank flow in compound trapezoidal channels |
|
|
441 | (8) |
|
7.1.6 Overbank flow in compound rectangular channels |
|
|
449 | (1) |
|
7.1.7 Overbank flow in the River Severn |
|
|
450 | (1) |
|
7.1.8 Flows in regime channels of lenticular shape with sediment |
|
|
451 | (1) |
|
7.2 Using Excel to solve the SKM equations numerically |
|
|
452 | (35) |
|
7.2.1 Introduction and explanatory notes |
|
|
452 | (1) |
|
7.2.2 The Flood Channel Facility (FCF), Series 02. |
|
|
452 | (8) |
|
7.2.3 Overbank flow in the River Main |
|
|
460 | (12) |
|
7.2.4 Overbank flow in the River Severn with trees on the floodplain |
|
|
472 | (4) |
|
7.2.5 Overbank flow in a compound trapezoidal channel with rod roughness |
|
|
476 | (6) |
|
7.2.6 Flow in the River Rhone, France |
|
|
482 | (1) |
|
7.2.7 Flow in the Yangtze River, China |
|
|
482 | (2) |
|
7.2.8 Flow in the Paute River, Ecuador |
|
|
484 | (1) |
|
7.2.9 Flow in other world rivers |
|
|
484 | (3) |
8 Further examples - estimating flow, level and velocity in practice |
|
487 | (26) |
|
8.1 Estimating and using stage-discharge relationships |
|
|
487 | (15) |
|
8.1.1 Stage-discharge prediction for the River Dane at Rudheath, Cheshire, UK |
|
|
487 | (4) |
|
8.1.2 Stage-discharge prediction for the river blackwater, Coleford Bridge, North-East Hampshire, UK |
|
|
491 | (3) |
|
8.1.3 Stage-discharge prediction for the River Torridge, Torrington, North Devon, UK |
|
|
494 | (2) |
|
8.1.4 Stage-discharge prediction for the River Blackwater at Ower, Hampshire and Wiltshire, UK |
|
|
496 | (2) |
|
8.1.5 Stage-discharge prediction for the River Heathcote, Sloan Terrace, NZ |
|
|
498 | (3) |
|
8.1.6 Stage discharge prediction for the River Cuenca, Ucubamba, Ecuador |
|
|
501 | (1) |
|
8.2 Estimating and using spatial velocities |
|
|
502 | (11) |
|
8.2.1 Velocity prediction for the River Severn at Shrewsbury |
|
|
502 | (2) |
|
8.2.2 Velocity prediction for the River Frome at East Burton, Dorset, UK |
|
|
504 | (3) |
|
8.2.3 Velocity prediction for the River Rhone, Lyon, France |
|
|
507 | (2) |
|
8.2.4 Velocity prediction for the Yangtze River, China |
|
|
509 | (4) |
9 Concluding remarks |
|
513 | (14) |
|
|
513 | (7) |
|
9.2 CES and SKM: Differences and Similarities |
|
|
520 | (2) |
|
|
522 | (5) |
Appendix 1 The finite element approximations for the CES equations |
|
527 | (4) |
Appendix 2 Summary of hydraulic equations used in the AES |
|
531 | (2) |
Appendix 3 Cross-section survey data |
|
533 | (12) |
Appendix 4 Derivation of the governing depth-averaged equation used in the SKM |
|
545 | (6) |
Appendix 5 Analytical solutions to the governing equation used in the SKM |
|
551 | (14) |
Appendix 6 Fortran program for solving the governing depth-averaged equation used in the SKM |
|
565 | (6) |
References |
|
571 | (24) |
Author index |
|
595 | (6) |
Subject index |
|
601 | |