Update cookies preferences

E-book: Assessing Research-Doctorate Programs: A Methodology Study

  • Format: 164 pages
  • Pub. Date: 19-Nov-2003
  • Publisher: National Academies Press
  • Language: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309527088
Other books in subject:
  • Format - PDF+DRM
  • Price: 35,10 €*
  • * the price is final i.e. no additional discount will apply
  • Add to basket
  • Add to Wishlist
  • This ebook is for personal use only. E-Books are non-refundable.
  • Format: 164 pages
  • Pub. Date: 19-Nov-2003
  • Publisher: National Academies Press
  • Language: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309527088
Other books in subject:

DRM restrictions

  • Copying (copy/paste):

    not allowed

  • Printing:

    not allowed

  • Usage:

    Digital Rights Management (DRM)
    The publisher has supplied this book in encrypted form, which means that you need to install free software in order to unlock and read it.  To read this e-book you have to create Adobe ID More info here. Ebook can be read and downloaded up to 6 devices (single user with the same Adobe ID).

    Required software
    To read this ebook on a mobile device (phone or tablet) you'll need to install this free app: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    To download and read this eBook on a PC or Mac you need Adobe Digital Editions (This is a free app specially developed for eBooks. It's not the same as Adobe Reader, which you probably already have on your computer.)

    You can't read this ebook with Amazon Kindle

How should we assess and present information about the quality of research-doctorate programs? In recommending that the 1995 NRC rankings in Assessing the Quality of Research-Doctorate Programs: Continuity and Change be updated as soon as possible, this study presents an improved approach to doctoral program assessment which will be useful to administrators, faculty, and others with an interest in improving the education of Ph.D.s in the United States. It reviews the methodology of the 1995 NRC rankings and recommends changes, including the collection of new data about Ph.D. students, additional data about faculty, and new techniques to present data on the qualitative assessment of doctoral program reputation. It also recommends revision of the taxonomy of fields from that used in the 1995 rankings.



Table of Contents



Front Matter Executive Summary 1. Introduction 2. How the Study Was Conducted 3. Taxonomy 4. Quantitative Measures 5. Student Education and Outcomes 6. Reputation and Data Presentation 7. General Conclusions and Recommendations 8. References Appendix A: Biographical Sketches: Committee and Panels Appendix B: Program-Initiation Consultation with Organizations Appendix C: Meetings and Participants Appendix D: Sample Questionnaires Appendix E: Taxonomy of Fields and Their Subfields Appendix F: Fields for Ph.D.s Granted During 1996-2001 Appendix G: Technical and Statistical Techniques
Executive Summary 1(9)
Introduction
9(6)
How The Study Was Conducted
15(4)
Taxonomy
19(6)
Quantitative Measures
25(6)
Student Education And Outcomes
31(4)
Reputation And Data Presentation
35(26)
General Conclusions And Recommendations
61(4)
References
65(4)
Appendixes
Biographical Sketches: Committee and Panels
69(10)
Program-Initiation Consultation with Organizations
79(4)
Meetings and Participants
83(22)
Sample Questionnaires
105(1)
Institutions
106(3)
Programs
109(5)
Faculty
114(4)
Students
Admitted-to-Candidacy Students
118(5)
Five-Seven Years Post-Ph.D. Students
123(6)
Taxonomy of Fields and Their Subfields
129(4)
Fields for Ph.D.s Granted During 1996-2001
133(4)
Technical and Statistical Techniques
Alternate Ways to Present Rankings: Random Halves and Bootstrap
137(9)
Correlates of Reputation Analysis
146


Jeremiah P. Ostriker and Charlotte V. Kuh, Editors, Assisted by James A. Voytuk, Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs, National Research Council