Series Foreword |
|
ix | |
Preface |
|
xi | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xv | |
|
1 Radical Human Enhancement as a Transformative Change |
|
|
1 | (16) |
|
Transformative Change and Invasion of the Body Snatchers |
|
|
5 | (5) |
|
The Rational Irreversibility of Some Transformative Changes |
|
|
10 | (4) |
|
Positive and Negative Transformative Changes |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Radical Enhancement as a Negative Transformative Change |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
2 Two Ideals of Human Enhancement |
|
|
17 | (16) |
|
Defining Human Enhancement |
|
|
18 | (2) |
|
The Objective Ideal of Human Enhancement |
|
|
20 | (6) |
|
The Instrumental and Intrinsic Value of Human Capacities |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Anthropocentric Ways of Evaluating Enhancements |
|
|
27 | (6) |
|
3 What Interest Do We Have in Superhuman Feats? |
|
|
33 | (22) |
|
The Value of Enhanced Marathons |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
|
36 | (8) |
|
Is Human Enhancement the Right Way to Pursue External Goods? |
|
|
44 | (6) |
|
Is the Distinction between Internalizing and Externalizing Enhancement Philosophically Principled? |
|
|
50 | (5) |
|
4 The Threat to Human Identities from Too Much Enhancement |
|
|
55 | (26) |
|
Two Psychological Accounts of Personal Identity |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
A Threat to Identity from Life Extension |
|
|
57 | (3) |
|
Radical Enhancement and Autobiographical Memory |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
How Does Autobiographical Memory Work? |
|
|
62 | (4) |
|
An Asymmetry in Our Attitudes toward Past and Future |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
The Tension between Enhancement and Survival |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
The Analogy with Childhood |
|
|
70 | (5) |
|
Why Radical Enhancement Is More Psychologically Disruptive Than Growing Up |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
The Regress Problem: The Tragedy of Unending Enhancement |
|
|
76 | (5) |
|
5 Should We Enhance Our Cognitive Powers to Better Understand the Universe and Our Place in It? |
|
|
81 | (32) |
|
Understanding the Consequences of Cognitive Enhancement for Science |
|
|
84 | (4) |
|
Two Ways in Which Human Science and Radically Enhanced Science Might Be Fundamentally Different |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
Differences in Idealization as Fundamental Differences between Human and Radically Enhanced Science |
|
|
89 | (4) |
|
Idealizations That Enhance the Power of Scientific Explanations |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
Mathematics as a Bridge between Human and Radically Enhanced Science |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
Human Science, Radically Enhanced Science, and the Theory of Everything |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
Dawkins and Haldane versus Deutsch on the Limits of Human Science |
|
|
98 | (4) |
|
How Different Idealizations Generate Different Theories of Everything |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
Valuing Human Science and Radically Enhanced Science |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Radical Enhancement Reduces the Intrinsic Value of Our Cognitive Faculties |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
What of Scientific Enhancement's Instrumental Benefits? |
|
|
109 | (4) |
|
6 The Moral Case against Radical Life Extension |
|
|
113 | (24) |
|
Two Kinds of Anti-Aging Research |
|
|
114 | (3) |
|
The SENS Response to the Seven Deadly Things |
|
|
117 | (3) |
|
Is Aging Really a Disease? |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
|
122 | (4) |
|
Why WILT (and Other SENS Therapies) Will Require Dangerous Human Trials |
|
|
126 | (3) |
|
Where to Find Human Guinea Pigs for SENS |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
Will Volunteer Risk Pioneers Help Out? |
|
|
131 | (4) |
|
Ethical Anti-Aging Experiments Not Now, but Some Day? |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
7 A Defense of Truly Human Enhancement |
|
|
137 | (20) |
|
The Ubiquity of Human Enhancement |
|
|
139 | (3) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
Defining Genetic Enhancement |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
The Interactionist View of Development |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
Six Ways in Which Genetic Enhancements Could Turn Out to Be More Morally Problematic Than Environmental Enhancements (but, in Fact, Do Not) |
|
|
146 | (8) |
|
The Ideal of Truly Human Enhancement |
|
|
154 | (3) |
|
8 Why Radical Cognitive Enhancement Will (Probably) Enhance Moral Status |
|
|
157 | (24) |
|
Enhancing Moral Status versus Enhancing Moral Dispositions |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
Why It's So Difficult to Enhance the Moral Status of Persons |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
A justification for (Talking about) Moral Statuses |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
Three Obstacles to Moral Enhancement |
|
|
161 | (4) |
|
(1) The Problem of the Logic of Thresholds |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
(2) The Problem of How to Improve upon Inviolability |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
(3) The Problem of Expressing Moral Statuses Higher Than Personhood |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
Three Attempts to Describe Higher Moral Statuses |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
DeGrazia's Dispositionally Superior Post-Persons |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
McMahan's Freer, More Conscious Post-Persons |
|
|
169 | (4) |
|
Douglas's Enhanced Cooperators |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
Criteria for Higher Moral Statuses and the Expressibility Problem |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
Why Cognitively Enhanced Beings Are Probably Better Than Us at Judging Relative Moral Status |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
Why Sufficiently Cognitively Enhanced Beings Will (Probably) Find That Cognitive Differences between Them and Us Mark a Difference in Moral Status |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
Two Hypotheses about Higher Moral Statuses |
|
|
178 | (3) |
|
9 Why Moral Status Enhancement Is a Morally Bad Thing |
|
|
181 | (14) |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
Why a Change in Relative Moral Status Is Likely to Lead to Significant Harms for Human Mere Persons |
|
|
184 | (5) |
|
Why Post-Persons Will Probably Identify Many Supreme Opportunities Requiring the Sacrifice of Mere Persons |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
What Complaint Can Mere Persons Make about the Harms They Suffer in Mixed Societies? |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
Why a Loss of Relative Status Is Unlikely to Be Adequately Compensated |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
10 A Technological Yet Truly Human Future---as Depicted in Star Trek |
|
|
195 | (6) |
Notes |
|
201 | (12) |
Index |
|
213 | |