Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: 2011-2012 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory

  • Formatas: 152 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 09-Apr-2013
  • Leidėjas: National Academies Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309269032
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: 152 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 09-Apr-2013
  • Leidėjas: National Academies Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309269032
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

The charge of the Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board (ARLTAB) is to provide biennial assessments of the scientific and technical quality of the research, development, and analysis programs at the Army Research Laboratory (ARL). The ARLTAB is assisted by six panels, each of which focuses on the portion of the ARL program conducted by one of ARL's six directorates1. When requested to do so by ARL, the ARLTAB also examines work that cuts across the directorates. For example, during 2011-2012, ARL requested that the ARLTAB examine crosscutting work in the areas of autonomous systems and network science.



The overall quality of ARL's technical staff and their work continues to be impressive. Staff continue to demonstrate clear, passionate mindfulness of the importance of transitioning technology to support immediate and longer-term Army needs. Their involvement with the wider scientific and engineering community continues to expand. Such continued involvement and collaboration are fundamentally important for ARL's scientific and technical activities and need to include the essential elements of peer review and interaction through publications and travel to attend professional meetings, including international professional meetings. In general, ARL is working very well within an appropriate research and development niche and has been demonstrating significant accomplishments, as exemplified in the following discussion, which also addresses opportunities and challenges.

Table of Contents



Front Matter Summary 1 Introduction 2 Computational and Information Sciences Directorate and Network Science Enterprise 3 Human Research and Engineering Directorate 4 Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate 5 Survivability/Lethality Analysis Directorate 6 Vehicle Technology Directorate and Autonomous Systems Enterprise 7 Weapons and Materials Research Directorate 8 Crosscutting Issues Appendixes Appendix A: Army Research Laboratory Organization Chart Appendix B: Membership of the Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board and Its Panels Appendix C: Assessment Criteria Appendix D: Acronyms and Abbreviations
Summary 1(12)
1 Introduction 13(5)
The Biennial Assessment Process,
13(1)
Preparation and Organization of This Report,
14(1)
Assessment Criteria,
15(1)
Approach Taken During Report Preparation,
16(1)
Report Content,
17(1)
2 Computational And Information Sciences Directorate And Network Science Enterprise 18(26)
Introduction,
18(1)
Computational and Information Sciences Directorate,
19(10)
Network Science Enterprise,
29(10)
Common Themes,
39(5)
3 Human Research And Engineering Directorate 44(17)
Introduction,
44(2)
Directorate-Wide Themes,
46(1)
Changes Since the Previous Review,
46(1)
Sensory Performance,
47(2)
Physical and Cognitive Performance Interaction,
49(3)
Translational Neuroscience,
52(3)
Human-Systems integration,
55(2)
Opportunity-Driven Research,
57(1)
Simulation and Training Technology,
58(3)
4 Sensors And Electron Devices Directorate 61(7)
Introduction,
61(1)
Changes Since the Previous Review,
61(1)
Accomplishments and Advancements,
62(4)
Opportunities and Challenges,
66(1)
Overall Technical Quality of the Work,
67(1)
5 Survivability/Lethality Analysis Directorate 68(14)
Introduction,
68(1)
Changes Since the Previous Review,
69(1)
Accomplishments and Advancements,
70(1)
Opportunities and Challenges,
71(4)
Overall Technical Quality of the Work,
75(1)
System-of-Systems Survivability Simulation,
76(6)
6 Vehicle Technology Directorate And Autonomous Systems Enterprise 82(21)
Introduction,
82(1)
Vehicle Technology Directorate,
83(5)
Autonomous Systems Enterprise,
88(15)
7 Weapons And Materials Research Directorate 103(15)
Introduction,
103(1)
Changes Since the Previous Review,
103(1)
Accomplishments and Advancements,
104(5)
Opportunities and Challenges,
109(7)
Overall Technical Quality of the Work,
116(2)
8 Crosscutting Issues 118(9)
Need for Technical Management Stability,
118(1)
ARL Impact,
119(1)
Enterprise Management,
119(2)
Extramural Collaborative Alliances,
121(6)
Appendixes
A Army Research Laboratory Organization Chart
127(1)
B Membership of the Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board and Its Panels
128(7)
C Assessment Criteria
135(3)
D Acronyms and Abbreviations
138