Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Advances in Arthropod Repellents [Minkštas viršelis]

Edited by (Research Associate, Department of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA), Edited by (General Manager, Del), Edited by (Charles F. Curtiss Distinguished Professor of Entomology, Department of Entomology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA)
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 358 pages, aukštis x plotis: 235x191 mm, weight: 700 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 19-Oct-2021
  • Leidėjas: Academic Press Inc
  • ISBN-10: 0323854117
  • ISBN-13: 9780323854115
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 358 pages, aukštis x plotis: 235x191 mm, weight: 700 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 19-Oct-2021
  • Leidėjas: Academic Press Inc
  • ISBN-10: 0323854117
  • ISBN-13: 9780323854115
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

Advances in Arthropod Repellents offers the most current knowledge on arthropod repellents. This area of study is quickly evolving as mosquito- and tick-borne diseases become more prevalent worldwide. Written by global arthropod repellent experts, this book begins by delving into molecule discovery and assay development that is followed by the latest research and investigations of repellent developments and effects. The book then offers readers a look into the global field, semi-field, and laboratory trials using various insect repellents, ranging from Africa, Australia, Europe, South America and the United States. Lastly, it examines the future of spatial repellents and expert insight.

This book is a valuable resource for entomologists and vector control researchers and practitioners. Public health officials and developers in private pest control companies, as well as readers in academia will find this a useful resource to learn the latest information available on controlling the spread of arthropod-borne diseases with repellents.

  • Discusses recent progress on understanding how insect repellents work, as well as modern methods for finding new molecules and formulations
  • Edited by a team whose expertise includes cutting-edge insect repellent research and development
  • Serves as a reference and resource that will be useful to a wide variety of professionals, particularly those in public health and vector control
Contributors ix
Preface xi
About the Editors xiii
Acknowledgments xv
In Memoriam Dr. Daniel Strickman xvii
1 Arthropod repellents in public health
Mustapha Debboun
Larry I. Goodyer
1.1 Arthropod repellents
1(1)
1.2 Role of arthropod repellents
2(1)
1.3 Brief history of arthropod repellents
3(1)
1.4 Types of arthropod repellents
4(2)
1.5 Personal protection from vector-borne diseases
6(3)
1.6 Assessment of arthropod repellents
9(4)
1.7 Conclusion
13(6)
References and further readings
13(6)
2 Novel pyrethroid derivatives as effective mosquito repellents and repellent synergists
Jeffrey Rloomquist
Shiyao Jiangi Edmund Norris
Gary Richoux
Liu Yang
Kenneth J. Linthicum
2.1 Introduction
19(1)
2.2 Spatial repellency assay and post-assay behavioral test
20(1)
2.3 Pyrethroid fragment screening for vapor phase repellency
21(1)
2.4 Repellency, synergism, and cross-resistance to pyrethroid acids
21(3)
2.5 Repellency and synergism of transfluthrin acid with experimental anthranilates and pyrazine repellents
24(2)
2.6 Repellency and synergism of α-terpinyl isovalerate ester and related compounds
26(2)
2.7 Screening for effects on the central nervous system
28(1)
2.8 Conclusion
29(4)
Acknowledgments
30(1)
References
30(3)
3 Biorational compounds as effective arthropod repellents against mosquitoes and ticks
Golin Wong
Caleb Corona
Joel Coats
3.1 Introduction
33(1)
3.2 Methods
34(2)
3.3 Results
36(6)
3.4 Discussion
42(4)
3.5 Conclusion
46(3)
References
47(2)
4 Evaluating techniques and efficacy of arthropod repellents against ticks
Muhammad Farooq
Rui-De Xue
Steven T. Peper
Whitney A. Quails
4.1 Introduction
49(1)
4.2 A brief history of arthropod repellents used for prevention of tick bites and the transmission of tick-borne diseases
50(1)
4.3 Evaluations of repellency
51(1)
4.4 Evaluation methods for spatial arthropod repellents
52(6)
4.5 Evaluation methods for topical arthropod repellents
58(6)
4.6 Challenges and recommendations
64(1)
4.7 Conclusion
65(4)
References
65(4)
5 Evaluation and application of repellent-treated uniform/clothing and textiles against vector mosquitoes
Ulrich R. Bernier
Melynda K. Perry
Rui-De Xue
Natasha M. Ayramonte
Amy L. Johnson
Kenneth J. Linthicum
5.1 Introduction: The need for personal protection and arthropod-repellent treated clothing
69(1)
5.2 Laboratory methods for evaluation of arthropod repellent treated US military uniforms
70(15)
5.3 Results of efficacy studies with US military uniform fabrics
85(6)
5.4 Laboratory methods for evaluation of arthropod repellent treated civilian clothing
91(2)
5.5 Conclusion
93(2)
References
94(1)
6 Repelling mosquitoes with electric fields
Ulla Gordon
Farooq Tanveer
Andreas Rose
Krijn Paaijmans
6.1 Electric fields
95(2)
6.2 Challenges in mosquito control
97(1)
6.3 Assessing the repellency of electric fields in the laboratory
98(6)
6.4 Practical application of electric fields: an approach
104(3)
6.5 Discussion
107(2)
6.6 Conclusion
109(4)
Acknowledgements
110(1)
References
110(3)
7 Multimodal mechanisms of repellency in arthropods
Fredis Mappin
Matrhew DeGennaro
7.1 Toward a more targeted approach
113(1)
7.2 The sensory basis for host detection and discrimination
114(2)
7.3 Proposed mechanisms of olfactory repellency
116(8)
7.4 Acidic volatiles and CO2 detection pathway modulation
124(1)
7.5 Toward the next generation of targeted arthropod repellents
125(1)
7.6 Conclusion
125(6)
Acknowledgments
126(1)
References
126(5)
8 Finding a repellent against ticks: neurophysiological and behavioral approaches
Zainuiabeuddin Syed
Kenneth L. O'Dell Jr.
8.1 Introduction
131(1)
8.2 How arthropod repellents work?
132(1)
8.3 Chemosensation in ticks
132(2)
8.4 Electrophysiological analyses for repellent discovery in ticks
134(1)
8.5 Behavioral analyses for repellent discovery in ticks
134(2)
8.6 Future directions
136(1)
8.7 Conclusion
137(4)
Acknowledgments
137(1)
References
137(4)
9 Arthropod repellents and chemosensory reception
Robert Renthal
9.1 Arthropod repellents act through chemoreceptor pathways
141(1)
9.2 Chemoreceptor anatomy
141(2)
9.3 Chemosensory receptors
143(3)
9.4 Hydrophobic ligand transport proteins
146(6)
9.5 High throughput screening methods for repellent discovery
152(2)
9.6 Conclusion
154(9)
References
154(9)
10 Semifield system and experimental huts bioassays for the evaluation of spatial (and topical) repellents for indoor and outdoor use
Mgeni Mohamed Tambwe
Johnson Kyeba Swai
Sarah Jane Moore
10.1 Introduction
163(2)
10.2 Semifield system and experimental hut for evaluating repellents
165(4)
10.3 Considerations for conducting semifield system and experimental huts experiments
169(10)
10.4 Study power
179(1)
10.5 Primary outcomes measured in the semifield system/experimental huts and computations
180(4)
10.6 Use of semifield system and experimental hut data for mathematical models
184(1)
10.7 Conclusion
185(8)
References
185(8)
11 Semi-field evaluation of arthropod repellents: emphasis on spatial repellents
Daniel L. Kline
Karen McKenzie
Adam Bowman
11.1 Introduction
193(8)
11.2 Testing guidelines for spatial arthropod repellents
201(2)
11.3 Semi-field environment defined
203(18)
11.4 Gainesville, Florida, USDA Center for Medical and Veterinary Entomology
221(8)
11.5 Conclusion
229(8)
References and further readings
229(8)
12 Human subject studies of arthropodrepellent efficacy, at the interface of science, ethics, and regulatory oversight
Shawn B. King
Cassandre H. Kaplinsky
Ralph Washington Jr.
Scott P. Carroll
12.1 Introduction
237(2)
12.2 Repellent testing in the context of pesticide regulation
239(3)
12.3 Human subjects versus surrogates for efficacy testing in wild mosquito populations
242(1)
12.4 Reducing reliance on human subject efficacy testing
243(2)
12.5 Regulation, ethics, and efficacy study design---historical overview and current conditions
245(1)
12.6 Risks vs benefits: study oversight and informed consent
245(5)
12.7 Conclusion
250(9)
Appendix
251(3)
Appendix references
254(1)
References and further readings
255(4)
13 Arthropod repellent research in Northwest Florida, United States
John P. Smith
13.1 Introduction
259(1)
13.2 Regulations
260(1)
13.3 Topical arthropod repellent bioassays
260(2)
13.4 Spatial arthropod repellent bioassays
262(2)
13.5 Promising arthropod repellents
264(1)
13.6 Conclusion
264(3)
References
265(2)
14 Current status of spatial repellents in the global vector control community
Nicole L. Achee
John P. Grieco
14.1 The public health problem
267(1)
14.2 Market shortcomings
268(2)
14.3 The spatial repellent product class
270(4)
14.4 Status in closing the knowledge gap
274(1)
14.5 Conclusion
275(5)
References
275(5)
15 Repellent semiochemical solutions to mitigate the impacts of global climate change on arthropod pests
Agenor Mafra-Neto
Mark Wright
Christopher Fettig
Robert Progar
Steve Munson
Darren Blackford
Jason Moan
Elizabeth Graham
Gabe Foote
Ratael Barges
Rodrigo Silva
Revilee Lake
Garment Bernardi
Jesse Saroli
Stephen Clarke
James Meeker
John Nowak
Arthur Agnello
Xavier Martini
Monique J. Rivera
Lukasz L. Stelinski
15.1 Introduction
280(2)
15.2 Coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari)
282(9)
15.3 Derulroctonus bark beetles: mountain pine beetle, southern pine beetle, douglas-fir beetle, and spruce beetle
291(10)
15.4 Ambrosia beetles: Redbay ambrosia beetle, black stem borer, and polyphagous shot hole borer
301(9)
15.5 Conclusion
310(13)
References
311(12)
16 The role of arthropod repellents in the control of vector-borne diseases
Stephen P. Frances
Mustapha Debboun
16.1 Introduction
323(1)
16.2 N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide
324(1)
16.3 Picaridin
325(1)
16.4 p-menthane-3,8-diol
325(1)
16.5 IR3535
326(1)
16.6 2-Undecanone
326(1)
16.7 Nootkatone
327(1)
16.8 Cost, formulation, and user acceptability
327(1)
16.9 Spatial arthropod repellents
328(1)
16.10 The use of arthropod repellents against vectors and vectordxvrne diseases
329(2)
16.11 Conclusion
331(6)
References and further readings
331(6)
Index 337
Joel Coats, Charles F. Curtiss Distinguished Professor of Entomology, in the Department of Entomology at Iowa State University, received his academic training at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, later obtaining a M.S. and Ph.D. in Entomology, with specialization in insecticide toxicology and environmental toxicology. His research program focuses on insect toxicology and environmental toxicology and chemistry. Current studies are focused on natural products as insecticides and repellents, as well as biorational analogs of them. Dr. Coats received the International Award for Research in Agrochemicals from the American Chemical Society; he is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Fellow of the American Chemical Society, and a Fellow of the Entomological Society of America. He has trained 53 graduate students and published over 200 peer-reviewed publications, including 15 books. Caleb Corona received his Ph.D. degree in Entomology and Toxicology from the lab of Dr. Joel Coats, Iowa State University, where his research focused on the development of novel insecticides and spatial repellents derived from natural products. He received his B.Sc. degree in Biology with a Chemistry minor from King University in Bristol, Tennessee, where he also served as a Teaching Assistant in Chemistry and later an undergraduate research assistant for federally funded Toxicology laboratory under Dr. Vanessa Fitsanakis . He has been invited as a symposium speaker at the Society for Vector Ecology, the Entomological Society of America, and the American Chemical society multiple times over the course of his career. Mustapha Debboun has a Ph.D. in Medical and Veterinary Entomology from the University of Missouri-Columbia, is a Board-Certified Entomologist (BCE) with the Entomological Society of America (ESA) and confirmed with the title of Fellow of the ESA. He has more than 27 years of experience in public health entomology, integrated vector management, personal protective measures, and mosquito/vector-borne diseases where this work has taken him to over 35 countries in Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe, and South America. He is currently the General Manager of Mosquito & Vector Control District in Visalia, California. He has published over 120 peer-reviewed scientific articles and co-edited five books. Dr. Debboun organizes national and international symposia, serves on 10 journal editorial review boards, and a reviewer for eight scientific peer-reviewed journals. He is also nationally and internationally recognized for his extensive work on arthropod repellent research and development.