Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Advances in Latent Class Analysis: A Festschrift in Honor of C. Mitchell Dayton [Minkštas viršelis]

  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 276 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 234x156x15 mm, weight: 392 g
  • Serija: CILVR Series on Latent Variable Methodology
  • Išleidimo metai: 07-May-2019
  • Leidėjas: Information Age Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1641135611
  • ISBN-13: 9781641135610
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 276 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 234x156x15 mm, weight: 392 g
  • Serija: CILVR Series on Latent Variable Methodology
  • Išleidimo metai: 07-May-2019
  • Leidėjas: Information Age Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1641135611
  • ISBN-13: 9781641135610
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

Latent class analysis (LCA) has evolved from a categorical data tool to a broader mixture modeling framework. This volume, part of the CILVR series, highlights LCA’s growth, inspired by C. Mitchell “Chan” Dayton’s contributions, and explores its future in defining subpopulations and integrating measured and latent variables.



What is latent class analysis? If you asked that question thirty or forty years ago you would have gotten a different answer than you would today. Closer to its time of inception, latent class analysis was viewed primarily as a categorical data analysis technique, often framed as a factor analysis model where both the measured variable indicators and underlying latent variables are categorical. Today, however, it rests within much broader mixture and diagnostic modeling framework, integrating measured and latent variables that may be categorical and/or continuous, and where latent classes serve to define the subpopulations for whom many aspects of the focal measured and latent variable model may differ.

For latent class analysis to take these developmental leaps required contributions that were methodological, certainly, as well as didactic. Among the leaders on both fronts was C. Mitchell “Chan” Dayton, at the University of Maryland, whose work in latent class analysis spanning several decades helped the method to expand and reach its current potential. The current volume in the Center for Integrated Latent Variable Research (CILVR) series reflects the diversity that is latent class analysis today, celebrating work related to, made possible by, and inspired by Chan’s noted contributions, and signaling the even more exciting future yet to come.

Preface vii
Biographic Sketch of Chauncey Mitchell Dayton ix
Acknowledgments xvii
1 On the Measurement of Noncompliance Using (Randomized) Item Response Models
1(16)
Ulf Bockenholt
Maarten Cruyff
Peter G. M. van der Heijden
Ardo van den Hout
1 Understanding Latent Class Model Selection Criteria by Concomitant-Variable Latent Class Models
17(12)
Jose G. Dias
3 Comparison of Multidimensional Item Response Models: Multivariate Normal Ability Distributions Versus Multivariate Polytomous Ability Distributions
29(32)
Shelby J. Haberman
Matthias von Davier
Yi-Hsuan Lee
4 Nonloglinear Marginal Latent Class Models
61(18)
Jacques A. Hagenaars
Wicher Bergsma
Marcel Croon
5 Mixture of Factor Analyzers for the Clustering and Visualization of High-Dimensional Data
79(20)
Geoffrey J. McLachlan
Jangsun Baek
Suren I. Rathnayake
6 Multimethod Latent Class Analysis
99(30)
Fridtjof W. Nussbeck
Michael Eid
7 The Use of Graphs in Latent Variable Modeling: Beyond Visualization
129(18)
Frank Rijmen
8 Logistic Regression With Floor and Ceiling Effects: Fixed and Random Effects Models
147(20)
David Rindskopf
Patrick E. Shrout
9 Model Based Analysis of Incomplete Data Using the Mixture Index of Fit
167(14)
Tamas Rudas
Emese Verdes
Juraj Medzihorsky
10 A Systematic Investigation of Within-Subject and Between-Subject Covariance Structures in Growth Mixture Models
181(42)
Junhui Liu
Jeffrey R. Harring
11 Latent Class Scaling Models for Longitudinal and Multilevel Data Sets
223(16)
Jeroen K. Vermunt
12 Modeling Structured Multiple Classification Latent Classes in Multiple Populations
239(18)
Xueli Xu
Matthias von Davier
About the Editors 257
Gregory R. Hancock, University of Maryland

Jeffrey R. Harring, University of Maryland

George B. Macready, University of Maryland