Contributors |
|
ix | |
Preface |
|
xi | |
Suckling, Milk, and the Development of Preferences Toward Maternal Cues by Neonates: From Early Learning to Filial Attachment? |
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
II. The Udder, the Milk, and the Neonate |
|
|
4 | (13) |
|
III. Milk: An Astonishingly Complex Fluid |
|
|
17 | (6) |
|
IV. Suckling and Early Learning |
|
|
23 | (5) |
|
V. Suckling and the Development of a Preference for the Mother in Sheep |
|
|
28 | (12) |
|
VI. The First Hours After Birth |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
|
47 | (12) |
A Neuroethological Approach to Song Behavior and Perception in European Starlings: Interrelationships Among Testosterone, Neuroanatomy, Immediate Early Gene Expression, and Immune Function |
|
|
GREGORY F. BALL, KEITH W. SOCKMAN, DEBORAH L. DUFFY, AND TIMOTHY Q. GENTNER |
|
|
|
I. Introduction: Song, European Starlings, and the Neuroethological Approach |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
II. Description of European Starling Song and Its Function |
|
|
61 | (3) |
|
III. Song Control Circuit and the Neuroendocrine Control of Song |
|
|
64 | (7) |
|
IV. Perception of Song in Starlings |
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
V. Physiological Responses to Song in Starlings |
|
|
74 | (16) |
|
VI. Functional Basis of Song Preferences in European Starlings |
|
|
90 | (14) |
|
VII. Putting It All Together: Song Production/Perception and Hormones |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (16) |
Navigational Memories in Ants and Bees: Memory Retrieval When Selecting and Following Routes |
|
|
THOMAS S. COLLETT, PAUL GRAHAM, ROBERT A. HARRIS, AND NATALIE HEMPEL-DE-IBARRA |
|
|
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
III. Navigational Memories |
|
|
127 | (21) |
|
IV. The Retrieval of Memories Along a Route |
|
|
148 | (7) |
|
V. Choice of Route and Destination |
|
|
155 | (10) |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
|
167 | (6) |
Functional Genomics Requires Ecology |
|
|
LARA S. CARROLL AND WAYNE K. POTTS |
|
|
|
I. The Problem: Many Genes Seem to Be Unnecessary |
|
|
173 | (4) |
|
II. Genes Lacking Phenotypes: Explanations and Experimental Approaches for Their Elucidation |
|
|
177 | (26) |
|
III. Gene Function Studies Demand Integrative Approaches |
|
|
203 | (4) |
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
|
209 | (8) |
Signal Detection and Animal Communication |
|
|
|
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
II. Essential Features of Signal Detection |
|
|
218 | (3) |
|
III. Application of Signal Detection Theory in Experimental Psychophysics |
|
|
221 | (3) |
|
IV. General Assumptions of Signal Detection Theory |
|
|
224 | (3) |
|
V. Specific Assumptions of Signal Detection Theory: Measuring Detectability |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
VI. Properties of Signals That Affect a Receiver's Performance |
|
|
229 | (5) |
|
VII. Classification of Signals in Addition to Detection |
|
|
234 | (4) |
|
VIII. Complex Patterns: Extension of the Concept of Channels |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
IX. Evolution of Signaling and Reception |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
X. Interpretation of Playback Experiments in Terms of Signal Detection Theory |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
XI. Practicalities of Experiments in Natural Situations |
|
|
241 | (2) |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
|
244 | (5) |
Preexisting Male Traits Are Important in the Evolution of Elaborated Male Sexual Display |
|
|
|
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
II. Alternative Models of Display Trait Evolution |
|
|
250 | (3) |
|
III. Problems with Current Models of Elaborate Display Trait Evolution |
|
|
253 | (7) |
|
IV. Evaluating Genetic Correlation Models |
|
|
260 | (4) |
|
V. Evaluating the Preexisting Preference Model |
|
|
264 | (7) |
|
VI. Evidence for the Co-option of Preexisting Traits |
|
|
271 | (13) |
|
VII. Implications and Conclusions |
|
|
284 | (3) |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
|
288 | (17) |
Adaptation, Genetic Drift, Pleiotropy, and History in the Evolution of Bee Foraging Behavior |
|
|
NIGEL E. RAINE, THOMAS C. INGS, ANNA DORNHAUS, NEHAL SALEH, AND LARS CHITTKA |
|
|
|
|
305 | (2) |
|
II. Comparison Between Species: Flower Constancy |
|
|
307 | (4) |
|
III. Comparison Between Species: Floral Color Preference |
|
|
311 | (2) |
|
IV. Comparison Between Populations: Floral Color Preferences |
|
|
313 | (4) |
|
V. Variation Within Populations: Color Preference and Foraging Performance |
|
|
317 | (3) |
|
VI. Variation Within Populations: Learning Behavior |
|
|
320 | (3) |
|
VII. Reciprocal Population Transplant Experiments: A Test of Local Adaptation |
|
|
323 | (3) |
|
VIII. Manipulation of the Foraging Environment: Scent Marking and Traplining |
|
|
326 | (4) |
|
IX. Manipulating Foraging Phenotypes: The Honeybee Dance |
|
|
330 | (4) |
|
X. Genetic Basis of Foraging Behavior |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
|
335 | (4) |
|
|
339 | (3) |
|
|
342 | (2) |
|
|
344 | (11) |
Kin Selection, Constraints, and the Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Long-Tailed Tits |
|
|
BEN J. HATCHWELL AND STUART P. SHARP |
|
|
|
|
355 | (3) |
|
II. Study Species, Study Sites, and General Methods |
|
|
358 | (2) |
|
III. Kin Discrimination by Helpers |
|
|
360 | (3) |
|
IV. Kin Recognition Mechanism |
|
|
363 | (7) |
|
V. Fitness Consequences of Cooperation |
|
|
370 | (11) |
|
VI. Ecological Basis for Cooperative Breeding |
|
|
381 | (5) |
|
|
386 | (3) |
|
|
389 | (1) |
|
|
390 | (7) |
How Do Little Blue Penguins "Validate" Information Contained in Their Agonistic Displays? |
|
|
|
|
|
397 | (2) |
|
|
399 | (3) |
|
III. Validations for Information Contained in Agonistic Displays |
|
|
402 | (36) |
|
IV. Investment Strategies Validating Signals and Signal Synergy |
|
|
438 | (3) |
|
|
441 | (2) |
|
|
443 | (6) |
Index |
|
449 | (14) |
Contents of Previous Volumes |
|
463 | |