Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: American Public Opinion and the Modern Supreme Court, 1930-2020: A Representative Institution

  • Formatas: PDF+DRM
  • Išleidimo metai: 29-Apr-2022
  • Leidėjas: Lexington Books
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781793623317
  • Formatas: PDF+DRM
  • Išleidimo metai: 29-Apr-2022
  • Leidėjas: Lexington Books
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781793623317

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

The United States Supreme Court is commonly thought to be an institution far removed from American public opinion. Yet nearly two-thirds of modern Supreme Court decisions reflect popular attitudes. Comparing over 500 Supreme Court decisions with timely nationwide poll questions since the mid-1930s, Thomas R. Marshall shows that most Supreme Court decisions agree with poll majorities or pluralities across time and across issues and often represent Americans views to the same degree as federal policymakers. This book looks beyond the litigants, economic interests, social movements, organized interest groups, or units of governments typically involved and instead examines how well the Court or the justices represent Americans views. Using nationwide public opinion, broken down by key subgroups, race, gender, education, and party affiliation, better describes exactly whom Supreme Court decisions and the justices individual votes best represent. His book will be of interest to scholars in political science, legal studies, history, and sociology.

Recenzijos

An extraordinary, one-of-a-kind analysis comparing hundreds of public opinion polls since the 1930s on issues before the Supreme Court to the Courts decisions. The two are closer than might be expected, one of the findings in a comprehensive study of a critical linkage in democratic representation. -- William Crotty, Northeastern University Marshall draws on hundreds of poll questions on specific decisions to demonstrate the modern Supreme Court represents American public opinion. The author traces this patten of representation primarily to a handful of ideologically flexible justices whose votes reflect American attitudes on specific issues. Compiling an invaluable wealth of data on the topic, this book is the most detailed polling-based account of the Supreme Court to date. -- Kayla Canelo, University of Texas at Arlington

List of Figures and Tables
vii
Preface ix
List of Abbreviations
xi
Introduction 1(8)
1 Viewing the Supreme Court as a Representative Institution
9(32)
2 Measuring the Supreme Court's Representative Role
41(18)
3 The Norm of Representation
59(20)
4 The Justices' Representative Role
79(26)
5 Representing Group Opinions
105(16)
6 Representation, Public Opinion, and the Modern Court
121(18)
Appendix: Poll-to-Ruling Matches and Issues 139(20)
Bibliography 159(28)
Index 187(4)
About the Author 191
Thomas R. Marshall is professor of political science at the University of Texas at Arlington.