Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems: 6th International Workshop, ArgMAS 2009, Budapest, Hungary, May 12, 2009. Revised Selected and Invited Papers [Minkštas viršelis]

Edited by , Edited by , Edited by , Edited by
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 321 pages, weight: 516 g, 36 Illustrations, black and white; X, 321 p. 36 illus., 1 Paperback / softback
  • Serija: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6057
  • Išleidimo metai: 10-May-2010
  • Leidėjas: Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. K
  • ISBN-10: 3642128041
  • ISBN-13: 9783642128042
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 321 pages, weight: 516 g, 36 Illustrations, black and white; X, 321 p. 36 illus., 1 Paperback / softback
  • Serija: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6057
  • Išleidimo metai: 10-May-2010
  • Leidėjas: Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. K
  • ISBN-10: 3642128041
  • ISBN-13: 9783642128042
This volume contains revised versions of the papers presented at the sixth e- tion of the International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, (ArgMAS2009),heldinBudapest,Hungary,inassociationwiththe8thInter- tional Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2009) in May 2009. Previous ArgMAS workshops have been held in New York City, USA (2004),Utrecht, The Netherlands (2005),Hakodate, Japan (2006), Honolulu, USA (2007) and Estoril, Portugal (2008). The event has now clearlyestablisheditselfonthe internationalcalendaramongresearchersinc- putational argument and dialectics. A brief word to explain these topics is in order. Di erent agents within a multi-agent system (MAS) potentially have di erential access to information and di erent capabilities, di erent beliefs, di erent preferences and desires, and di erent goals. A key aspect of the scienti c and engineering study of mul- agentsystemsthereforehasbeenthedevelopmentofmethodsandproceduresfor identifying, assessing, reconciling, arbitrating between, managing, and mitig- ing suchdi erences. Marketmechanismsandvotingproceduresaretwo methods fordealing with thesedi erences. Argumentationisanother. Argumentationcan be understood as the formal interaction of di erent arguments for and against some conclusion (e. g. , a proposition, an action intention, a preference, etc. ). An agent may use argumentation techniques to perform individual reasoning for itself alone, in order to resolve con icting evidence or to decide between c- ?icting goals it may have. Two or more agents may also jointly use dialectical argumentationto identify, express,andreconciledi erencesbetweenthemselves, by means of interactions such as negotiation, persuasion, inquiry, and joint - liberation.
Practical Reasoning and Argument about Action.- Burden of Proof in
Deliberation Dialogs.- A Generative Dialogue System for Arguing about Plans
in Situation Calculus.- Dominant Decisions by Argumentation Agents.- A Model
for Integrating Dialogue and the Execution of Joint Plans.- Practical
Reasoning Using Values.- Persuasion and Negotiation.- Strategic Argumentation
in Rigorous Persuasion Dialogue.- Assumption-Based Argumentation for the
Minimal Concession Strategy.- Subjective Effectiveness in Agent-to-Human
Negotiation: A Frame x Personality Account.- Argumentation Theory.- Dynamics
in Argumentation with Single Extensions: Attack Refinement and the Grounded
Extension (Extended Version).- Arguing Using Opponent Models.- Realizing
Argumentation in Multi-agent Systems Using Defeasible Logic Programming.-
Computing Abductive Argumentation in Answer Set Programming.- Multi-Party
Argument from Experience.- Applications and Emotions.- Using Ontology
Modularization for Efficient Negotiation over Ontology Correspondences in
MAS.- Applying Dialogue Games to Manage Recommendation in Social Networks.-
Emotions in Rational Decision Making.- Using Personality Types to Support
Argumentation.- Comparing Argumentation Frameworks for Composite Ontology
Matching.