Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Aristotle on Prescription: Deliberation and Rule-Making in Aristotles Practical Philosophy [Kietas viršelis]

  • Formatas: Hardback, 276 pages, aukštis x plotis: 235x155 mm, weight: 586 g
  • Serija: Philosophia Antiqua 152
  • Išleidimo metai: 01-Nov-2018
  • Leidėjas: Brill
  • ISBN-10: 900438538X
  • ISBN-13: 9789004385382
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Hardback, 276 pages, aukštis x plotis: 235x155 mm, weight: 586 g
  • Serija: Philosophia Antiqua 152
  • Išleidimo metai: 01-Nov-2018
  • Leidėjas: Brill
  • ISBN-10: 900438538X
  • ISBN-13: 9789004385382
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
The focus of Aristotle on Prescription is Aristotles reflections on rule-making. It is widely believed that Aristotle was only concerned with decision-making, understood as a deliberative process enabling a person to arrive at particular, contingent decisions. However, rule-making is fundamental to Aristotles ethical texts. Establishing rules means indicating patterns for action that are sufficiently specific to meet situational difficulties and sufficiently constant in time to provide us with a code of behaviour to be used in similar situations. When we prescribe rules, we demonstrate the ability to direct not only our own life but also other peoples lives. Alesses book explores Aristotles deep reflections on the nature and functions of prescription, and on the relationship between rules and individual decisions.

Recenzijos

"The book presents challenging and controversial interpretations of a variety of texts and issues, and will be of interest to specialists in Aristotles practical philosophy." David J. Riesbeck, in: Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2019.07.62

Preface ix
Acknowledgements xi
Note to the Reader xii
1 The Reasons for This Research
1(53)
1 The Focus of This Research. Aristotle Reflects on Prescription
1(13)
2 The Historical Background: the Debate on Prescription in the v and iv Centuries
14(15)
3 Aristotle's Criticism of Socrates
29(16)
4 Prescription in Plato's Republic
45(4)
5 The Reasons for a Historiographical Inquiry. Synopsis of the Book
49(5)
2 Problems and Debates
54(40)
1 The Relationship between Deliberation and the So-Called Practical Syllogism
54(10)
2 The Relationship between the Logical Form of Deliberation and Practical Syllogism
64(6)
3 The Object of Deliberation
70(8)
4 Circumstances. The Particularistic Interpretation
78(6)
5 The Shaping of Habit
84(4)
6 Concluding Remarks on the Debate about Practical Reasoning
88(6)
3 Deliberation and Prescription
94(64)
1 Preliminary Remarks: Deliberation as Procedural Reasoning
94(8)
2 The Structure of Deliberation
102(6)
3 The Hypothetical Method
108(8)
4 The Mathematical Model
116(5)
5 The Remote End
121(7)
6 Desire, Deliberation and Prescription
128(5)
7 Deliberative Imagination and Recollection
133(9)
8 The Conversion of Deliberation into Syllogism
142(9)
9 The "Advantage" of Syllogism. Normative Opinions
151(7)
4 Prescriptive Reason and Practical Wisdom
158(51)
1 Preliminary Remarks on Aristotle's Notion of Prescription
158(5)
2 The Semantic and Conceptual Domain of Prescription. The Platonic Background
163(10)
3 Prescriptive Logos as a Psychic Faculty
173(8)
4 The Argumentative and Discursive Nature of Prescriptive Logos
181(6)
5 The Prescriptive Function of Practical Wisdom
187(11)
6 Prescription and Moral Character
198(4)
7 Ergon and chresis
202(7)
5 Prescription and Architectonic Order
209(37)
1 Prescription and Politics. Preliminary Remarks
209(7)
2 The Difference between Action and Production
216(7)
3 The Relationship of Prescription with Use and Possession
223(11)
4 Prescriptive Wisdom and True Opinion
234(7)
5 Brief Remarks on the Guiding Functions of the State
241(5)
Conclusions 246(5)
Bibliography 251(11)
Index Nominum et Rerum 262(3)
Index Locorum 265
Francesca Alesse is Senior Researcher at the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (Italy). She has published monographs and articles on Hellenistic philosophy and edited collective volumes on early and late philosophical traditions (e.g. Philo of Alexandria and Post-Aristotelian Philosophy, Brill 2008).