Challenging monolithic modern narratives about 'Chinese science', Daniel Patrick Morgan examines the astral sciences in China c.221 BCE750 CE as a study in the disunities of scientific cultures and the narratives by which ancients and moderns alike have fought to instil them with a sense of unity. The book focuses on four unifying 'legends' recounted by contemporary subjects: the first two, redolent of antiquity, are the 'observing of signs' and 'granting of seasons' by ancient sage kings; and the other two, redolent of modernity, involve the pursuit of 'accuracy' and historical 'accumulation' to this end. Juxtaposing legend with the messy realities of practice, Morgan reveals how such narratives were told, imagined, and re-imagined in response to evolving tensions. He argues that, whether or not 'empiricism' and 'progress' are real, we must consider the real effects of such narratives as believed in and acted upon in the history of astronomy in China.
Responding to monolithic modern narratives about 'Chinese science', Morgan examines the astral sciences in early China as a study in the disunities of Chinese scientific cultures and the narratives by which ancients and moderns alike have fought to instil them with a sense of unity.
Recenzijos
'A magisterial work that elevates the study of astral sciences in early imperial China to a wholly new level. This book is a must-read for anyone interested in the history and development of Chinese calendrics, astronomical instrumentation, and the official and intellectual milieus in which practitioners worked and reflected on their craft.' D. W. Pankenier, Lehigh University, Pennsylvania 'There is much to praise about this book It brings together technical and theoretical brilliance and presents a bold new vision of the history of the astral sciences in early imperial China. More important, it provides readers with a nuanced understandingof the varied and changing ways that the premodern Chinese investigated the skies.' Miranda Brown, Isis
Daugiau informacijos
An innovative history of astronomy in China, 221 BCE750 CE, stressing plurality, change and the unifying power of myth-making.
|
|
|
ix | |
| Acknowledgements |
|
xi | |
| Introduction |
|
1 | (6) |
| Conventions |
|
7 | (2) |
|
|
|
9 | (41) |
|
1.1 Intellectual Framework |
|
|
10 | (15) |
|
|
|
10 | (4) |
|
|
|
14 | (6) |
|
|
|
20 | (5) |
|
|
|
25 | (11) |
|
1.2.1 A History of Policy |
|
|
26 | (5) |
|
1.2.2 A History of Practice |
|
|
31 | (5) |
|
|
|
36 | (12) |
|
|
|
36 | (5) |
|
|
|
41 | (4) |
|
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
|
50 | (45) |
|
2.1 Instrument Repertoire |
|
|
52 | (21) |
|
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
|
|
56 | (6) |
|
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
|
|
65 | (8) |
|
|
|
73 | (14) |
|
2.2.1 The Philosophical Sphere |
|
|
73 | (4) |
|
2.2.2 The Material Sphere |
|
|
77 | (8) |
|
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
2.3 The Ambiguities of `Observation' |
|
|
87 | (6) |
|
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
|
|
95 | (45) |
|
|
|
97 | (18) |
|
|
|
98 | (10) |
|
|
|
108 | (3) |
|
|
|
111 | (4) |
|
3.2 The Ritual and Administrative Apparatus |
|
|
115 | (11) |
|
3.2.1 Calendar Distribution |
|
|
117 | (3) |
|
|
|
120 | (6) |
|
|
|
126 | (12) |
|
|
|
127 | (4) |
|
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
|
|
133 | (5) |
|
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
4 Reverent Accordance with Prodigious Heaven |
|
|
140 | (37) |
|
4.1 Cause for Deliberation |
|
|
142 | (10) |
|
4.1.1 Turns of Fortune, 168--196 CE |
|
|
143 | (2) |
|
4.1.2 The Case for Reform, 223 CE |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
4.1.3 The Tabling of Reform, 226 CE |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
4.1.4 New Emperor, New Regrets, 227--239 CE |
|
|
149 | (3) |
|
4.1.5 Collapse, 239--317 CE |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
|
|
152 | (11) |
|
|
|
152 | (10) |
|
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
|
163 | (11) |
|
|
|
163 | (7) |
|
4.3.2 Masculinity, Missile Sports and Mathematical Precision |
|
|
170 | (4) |
|
|
|
174 | (3) |
|
5 What the Ancients Had Yet to Learn |
|
|
177 | (36) |
|
5.1 The Analyst: Looking Forward and Looking Up |
|
|
179 | (9) |
|
5.2 The Annalist: Looking Back and Looking Down |
|
|
188 | (14) |
|
5.2.1 Instrument-Cosmos, 220--479 CE |
|
|
190 | (6) |
|
5.2.2 Li Numbers, 220--479 CE |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
5.2.3 The Mirror of History |
|
|
199 | (3) |
|
5.3 The Ascetic: The Siddhis of Science and the Awakening of Man |
|
|
202 | (7) |
|
5.3.1 The Alchemist: Ge Hong (283--343 CE) |
|
|
203 | (3) |
|
5.3.2 The Acarya: Yixing (683--727 CE) |
|
|
206 | (3) |
|
|
|
209 | (4) |
|
|
|
213 | (12) |
| Appendix Co-ordinates |
|
225 | (4) |
| Abbreviations |
|
229 | (1) |
| Bibliography |
|
230 | (1) |
| Pre-1850 Texts and Epigraphic Sources, by Title |
|
230 | (4) |
| Secondary Sources |
|
234 | (18) |
| Index |
|
252 | |
Daniel Patrick Morgan is a researcher at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, (CNRS) Laboratoire SPHERE (Sciences, Philosophie, Histoire), Université Paris Diderot, having previously graduated from the University of Chicago. From 2013 to 2016, he was a member of the European Research Council project, Mathematical Sciences in the Ancient World (SAW). Trained as a sinologist, his research focusses on manuscript culture and the history of science in Ancient China.
Daugiau apie elektronines knygas