Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Award of Contracts in EU Procurements [Minkštas viršelis]

Edited by , Edited by
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 372 pages
  • Serija: European Procurement Law Series 5
  • Išleidimo metai: 09-Jan-2014
  • Leidėjas: DJOFPublishing
  • ISBN-10: 8757431531
  • ISBN-13: 9788757431537
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Award of Contracts in EU ProcurementsDidesnis paveikslėlis
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 372 pages
  • Serija: European Procurement Law Series 5
  • Išleidimo metai: 09-Jan-2014
  • Leidėjas: DJOFPublishing
  • ISBN-10: 8757431531
  • ISBN-13: 9788757431537
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Pastovi nuoroda: https://www.kriso.lt/db/9788757431537.html
This is the fifth volume in the European Procurement Law Series with an analysis of one of the most important elements of EU public procurement law: Award of the public contract. The subject of this book has for obvious reasons already received scholarly attention in the many books and articles on EU public procurement law. However, the existing literature has seldom been based on a comparative approach covering a broad range of Member States of the European Union with diversified national approaches to EU public procurement law. The present publication is original in this sense and consequently provides the reader with an insight that cannot be found elsewhere. This publication includes specific chapters on the state of law and developments in Germany, France, United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Poland, Romania and Denmark.
Foreword by the Editors of the European Procurement Law Series 13(2)
List of Contributors 15(6)
1 Award criteria under EU law (old and new) 21(18)
Roberto Caranta
1 Introduction
21(1)
2 What are award criteria? A heterodox view
21(6)
3 Award criteria: the law as it is
27(3)
4 The MEAT requirements flowing from the principles of equal treatment and transparency
30(5)
5 The reform: modernising award criteria
35(2)
6 Conclusions
37(1)
Bibliography
38(1)
2 Award of contracts covered by the EU Public Procurement rules in Denmark 39(30)
Steen Treumer
1 Introduction
39(1)
2 Selection and award criteria
40(5)
3 Lowest price
45(2)
4 Most economically advantageous tender (MEAT)
47(7)
5 Procedure for evaluating MEAT, juries, transparency and judicial review
54(2)
6 Reservations and rejection of non-compliant tenders
56(6)
6.1 Non-compliance with substantive requirements
57(3)
6.2 Non-compliance with procedural formalities
60(2)
7 Abnormally low tenders
62(4)
Bibliography
66(3)
3 Award of contracts covered by the EU Public Procurement rules in France 69(22)
Francois Lichere
1 Introduction
69(2)
2 Selection and award criteria
71(1)
3 Lowest price
72(3)
4 Most economically advantageous tender (MEAT)
75(7)
5 Procedure for evaluating MEAT, juries, transparency and judicial review
82(4)
6 Abnormally low tenders
86(1)
Bibliography
87(4)
4 Awarding of Contracts in German Procurement Law 91(36)
Martin Burgi
1 Introduction
91(2)
2 Selection and award criteria
93(4)
2.1 Overview
93(1)
2.2 Difference between award criteria and selection criteria - The rule that no bidder is "better suited"
94(3)
3 Lowest Price
97(6)
3.1 National legislation
97(3)
3.2 The use of the lowest price in practice
100(1)
3.3 The calculation of the lowest price
101(1)
3.4 Tenders equal in pricing
101(1)
3.5 Procedures for awards on the basis of the lowest price
102(1)
4 Most economically advantageous tender (MEAT)
103(7)
4.1 Award criteria
103(1)
4.2 Relevance of price in MEAT
104(1)
4.3 The weighting of MEAT
105(3)
4.4 Weighting not held possible
108(1)
4.5 Adjustment or change of award criteria
108(1)
4.6 Communication of weighting rules
109(1)
4.7 Adjustment of weighting criteria
110(1)
5 Procedure for evaluating MEAT, transparency and judicial review
110(6)
5.1 Competency
110(1)
5.2 Use of MEAT in e-auctions
111(1)
5.3 Measures to prevent abuse
112(2)
5.4 Opening of the tenders
114(1)
5.5 Review of the award decision
115(1)
5.6 Adjustment of award criteria by the review body
116(1)
6 Reservation and rejection of non-compliant bids
116(4)
7 Abnormally low tenders
120(4)
7.1 No discretion for the contracting authority
120(2)
7.2 Reasons for scrutinizing
122(1)
7.3 General methodology
122(1)
7.4 Abnormally low tenders due to State aid
123(1)
8 Conclusion
124(1)
Bibliography
124(3)
5 Award of contracts covered by EU Public Procurement rules in Italy 127(18)
Roberto Caranta
Mario E. Comba
1 Introduction: main features of the national system
127(2)
2 Selection and award criteria
129(1)
3 Lowest price
130(2)
4 Most economically advantageous tender (MEAT)
132(2)
5 Public procurements for innovation
134(1)
6 Procedure for evaluating MEAT, juries, transparency and judicial review
135(5)
7 Reservations and rejection of non-compliant bids
140(2)
8 Abnormally low tenders
142(1)
Bibliography
143(2)
6 Awarding of Contracts in Polish Procurement Law 145(32)
Marcin Spyra
Piotr Szwedo
1 Introduction: the main features of the national system
145(1)
2 Selection and award criteria
146(2)
3 Lowest price
148(6)
3.1 The best tender based not only on the lowest price criterion
148(2)
3.2 The use of the "lowest price" in the practice of public procurement
150(1)
3.3 Calculation of the lowest price
150(2)
3.4 Equal tenders
152(1)
3.5 Procedures based on the price criterion only
153(1)
4 Most economically advantageous tender (MEAT)
154(7)
4.1 Selection of the award criteria
154(3)
4.2 Weighting of criteria
157(3)
4.3 Change of criteria, sub-criteria and models
160(1)
5 Procedure for evaluating MEAT (best tender), juries, transparency and judicial review
161(7)
5.1 Tender committees (juries)
161(1)
5.2 MEAT (best tender) in Electronic Auctions.
162(1)
5.3 Limits of discretion in selection of the MEAT (best tender)
163(1)
5.4 Transparency safeguards in the selection of the MEAT (best tender)
164(3)
5.5 Review of award procedures and adjustment of award criteria
167(1)
6 Reservation and rejection of non-compliant bids
168(4)
7 Abnormally low prices
172(3)
8 Specific issues disputed at national level
175(1)
Bibliography
176(1)
7 The Theory and Practice of Award Criteria in the Romanian Procurement Law 177(32)
D. Dragos B. Neamtu
R. Suciu
1 Introduction: Main features of the national system
177(3)
2 Selection and award criteria
180(3)
3 Lowest price
183(5)
3.1 Award criteria under the national law
183(1)
3.2 Use of the lowest price criterion in practice
184(1)
3.3 Calculation of the lowest price
184(1)
3.4 Tenders equal in pricing
185(2)
3.5 Procedures for award on the basis of the lowest price
187(1)
3.6 Difficulties with applying the lowest price criterion
187(1)
4 Most economically advantageous tender (MEAT)
188(6)
4.1 Award criteria within the MEAT
188(1)
4.2 Relevance of price in MEAT
188(2)
4.3 The weighing of evaluation factors within MEAT
190(3)
4.4 Cases when weighting is not possible
193(1)
4.5 Change of the award criteria
193(1)
4.6 Communication of the evaluation methodology/algorithm to the tenderers prior to the submission of tenders
194(1)
4.7 Adjustment/replacement of the methodology
194(1)
5 Procedure for evaluation MEAT: Juries, transparency and judicial review
194(6)
5.1 Composition of the evaluation commission
194(3)
5.2 Use of MEAT in e-auctions
197(1)
5.3 Discretion and the avoidance of abuses
198(1)
5.4 Transparency requirements
198(2)
5.5 Review of the award decision by the Council and the courts
200(1)
6 Reservations and rejection of non-compliant tenders
200(3)
7 Abnormally low tenders
203(4)
7.1 No mandatory requirement for dismissal
203(1)
7.2 Elements scrutinized for abnormally low values
204(2)
7.3 Methodology for determining abnormally low prices
206(1)
7.4 Abnormally low tenders due to illegal state aid or other subsidies
206(1)
8 Conclusions
207(1)
Biography
208(1)
8 Award Criteria and Award-Related Challenges under Spanish Public Procurement Law 209(42)
Albert Sanchez Graells
1 Introduction: Main features of the national system
209(3)
2 Selection and Award Criteria
212(3)
3 Lowest Price
215(5)
3.1 'Lowest price' criterion as the only acceptable price-related criterion
215(1)
3.2 Limited freedom to choose the 'lowest price' criterion over MEAT
216(1)
3.3 Ties in case of use of 'lowest price' criterion
217(3)
4 Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT)
220(10)
4.1 Criteria to be taken into consideration when using MEAT and their weighting
220(5)
4.2 Practical impossibility of excluding price considerations in the award of public contracts
225(1)
4.3 Cases where the use of MEAT is compulsory
226(1)
4.4 Weighting of criteria and evaluation models used to determine the MEAT
227(2)
4.5 Ties in case of use of MEAT
229(1)
5 Procedure for Evaluating MEAT, Juries, Transparency and Judicial Review
230(9)
5.1 Procedure for evaluating MEAT, Juries and Transparency
230(3)
5.2 Administrative Appeals and Judicial Review
233(6)
6 Reservations and Rejection of Non-Compliant Bids
239(4)
7 Abnormally Low Offers
243(5)
7.1 Screening of abnormally low offers when 'lowest price' is used
243(2)
7.2 Screening of abnormally low offers when MEAT is used
245(1)
7.3 Common provisions applicable to a finding of an apparently abnormally low tender
245(3)
8 Conclusions
248(1)
Bibliography
248(3)
9 Awarding of public contracts in the United Kingdom 251(22)
Pedro Telles
1 Introduction: Main features of the national system
251(2)
2 Selection and award criteria
253(5)
a Selection
254(2)
b Award criteria
256(2)
3 Lowest price
258(1)
4 Most economically advantageous tender
259(2)
5 Procedure for evaluating MEAT, juries, transparency and judicial review
261(2)
6 Reservations and rejection of non-compliant bids
263(2)
7 Abnormally low tenders
265(2)
8 Specific issues disputed at national level
267(4)
a Disclosure of sub-criteria
267(3)
b Procurement of innovation
270(1)
Conclusion
271(1)
Bibliography
271(2)
10 Rejection of abnormally low and non-compliant tenders in EU public procurement: A comparative view on selected jurisdictions 273(36)
Albert Sanchez Graells
1 Introduction
273(1)
2 Treatment of Abnormally Low Tenders
274(13)
2.1 EU Rules and Case Law
274(8)
2.2 Applicable Rules in the Selected Jurisdictions
282(5)
3 Treatment of Non-Compliant Bids
287(20)
3.1 EU Rules and Case Law
287(8)
3.2 Applicable Rules in the Selected Jurisdictions
295(12)
4 Conclusions
307(2)
11 The electronic award of public procurement 309(30)
Gabriella M. Racca
1 Introduction. E-procurement strategies in Europe: overcoming inertia and fragmentation
309(7)
2 Efficiency and transparency through e-procurement solutions
316(3)
3 Pre-award electronic advertising: the evolution towards full electronic means for the submission of the requirements and of the offers
319(5)
3.1 The electronic submissions of tenders and of e-signatures
321(3)
4 E-procurement solutions for the automatic evaluation of bids and tenders: the lowest electronic price and the most economically advantageous electronic tender
324(10)
4.1 Electronic auctions as a tool for electronic evaluation of tenders
326(8)
5 Conclusions
334(1)
Bibliography
335(4)
12 Evaluation models in public procurement: A comparative law perspective 339(20)
Paula Bordalo Faustino
1 Introduction
339(1)
2 Descriptive elements of an evaluation model
340(5)
3 The use of evaluation models
345(10)
3.1 Legal framework and practice
345(7)
3.2 Transparency requirements
352(2)
3.3 Changes to evaluation models
354(1)
4 Judicial review of evaluation models
355(2)
5 Conclusions
357(1)
Bibliography
358(1)
List of Cases 359(12)
Index 371