Contributors |
|
xiii | |
|
1 Bacillus thuringiensis based biopesticides for integrated crop management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.2 The early beginning of Bacillus thuringiensis as biopesticide |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.3 The past last twenty years of B. thuringiensis as biopesticide |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
1.4 The present and the future of B. thuringiensis as biopesticide |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
1.5 Conclusions and perspectives |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
2 Biopesticides for management of arthropod pests and weeds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 Agriculture and pests |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
2.1.1 Synthetic pesticides and challenges |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
2.1.2 From pesticides to biopesticides |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
2.2 Inconsistencies in understanding the term "biopesticides" |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
2.2.1 Microbial biopesticides |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
2.2.2 Nematodes biopesticides |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
2.3 Plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
2.4 Biochemical pesticides |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 Plant essential oils |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
2.5 The biopesticides market and challenges |
|
|
13 | (6) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (5) |
|
3 Biopesticide formulations - current challenges and future perspectives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
3.2 A view through history |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
3.4 Diversity of biopesticides |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
3.5 Formulation of biopesticides |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
3.7 Challenges and future perspectives |
|
|
27 | (4) |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
4 Application technology of biopesticides |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
4.3 Biopesticides and adjuvants |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
4.4 Mixture of biopesticides and pesticides |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
4.5 Influence of climatic factors on the application of biopesticides |
|
|
33 | (3) |
|
4.5.1 Relative humidity and temperature |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
4.5.2 Wind speed and direction |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
4.5.3 Timing of biopesticides application |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
5 Microbial pesticides: trends, scope and adoption for plant and soil improvement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
5.2 Types of microbial pesticides |
|
|
37 | (16) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
5.2.5 Genetically modified microbes |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
5.2.6 Microbes supporting plants and soil health |
|
|
47 | (6) |
|
5.3 Trends and market demand for microbial pesticide |
|
|
53 | (4) |
|
5.3.1 Global market reports on use of microbial pesticides |
|
|
54 | (3) |
|
5.4 Registration and regulation of microbial pesticide globally |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
5.5 Conclusion and future prospects |
|
|
58 | (15) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (14) |
|
6 Entomopathogenic nematodes: a sustainable option for insect pest management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
6.2 Baiting, isolation, multiplication of EPNs |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
6.3 Identification of EPNs |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
6.4 The liaison between EPNs and mutualistic bacteria and their identification |
|
|
76 | (4) |
|
6.5 Lifes cycle, pathogenicity and host range of EPNs |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
6.6 Mass production, formulation development and application |
|
|
81 | (5) |
|
6.6.1 Types of formulations |
|
|
82 | (4) |
|
6.7 Application of EPN genomics to enhance the field efficacy |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
6.8 Conclusion and future perspectives |
|
|
87 | (6) |
|
|
87 | (6) |
|
7 Scientific and technological trajectories for sustainable agricultural solutions: the case of biopesticides |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
7.3 Discussion and analysis of results |
|
|
96 | (4) |
|
7.3.1 Scientific trajectory |
|
|
96 | (4) |
|
7.4 Technological trajectory |
|
|
100 | (3) |
|
|
103 | (4) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (4) |
|
8 Biopesticides: a genetics, genomics, and molecular biology perspective |
|
|
|
Pawan Basnet Rajiv Dhital |
|
|
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
8.1.1 Advantages of application biopesticides in pest management |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
8.2 Market trends of biopesticides |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
8.3 Factors for increasing trends toward biopesticides |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
8.4 Constraints for the applications of biopesticides |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
8.5 Role of genetic engineering in context of biopesticides |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
8.5.1 Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
8.5.2 Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
8.5.4 RNAi based biopesticides |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
8.5.5 Plant-incorporated protectants (PIPs) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
8.5.6 Entomopathogenic fungi |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
8.5.7 Botanical biopesticides |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
113 | (4) |
|
|
114 | (3) |
|
9 Bacillus thuringiensis, a remarkable biopesticide: from lab to the field |
|
|
|
Igor Henrique Sena da Silva |
|
|
Marcelo Mueller de Freitas |
|
|
Ricardo Antonio Polanczyk |
|
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
9.2 Isolation and epizootic potential of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
9.3 Nomenclature and characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry pesticidal proteins |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
9.4 Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
9.5 Development of Bacillus thuringiensis formulations |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
9.6 Bacillus thuringiensis compatibility with natural enemies and Bt plants |
|
|
122 | (11) |
|
9.6.1 Final considerations |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (9) |
|
10 Biopesticides for management of arthropod pests and weeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
|
135 | (5) |
|
10.2.1 Plant extracts and essential oils with herbicidal activity |
|
|
135 | (4) |
|
10.2.2 Bioherbicides produced by microorganisms |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
10.3 Biopesticides against harmful arthropodes |
|
|
140 | (4) |
|
10.4 Nanoscale biopesticide formulations against arthropod pests and weeds |
|
|
144 | (4) |
|
10.4.1 Bioherbicides in nanoformulations |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
10.4.2 Biopesticide nanoformulations against anthropodes |
|
|
145 | (3) |
|
|
148 | (11) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (10) |
|
11 Salvia leucantha essential oil encapsulated in chitosan nanoparticles with toxicity and feeding physiology of cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonardo Fernandes Fraceto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
11.2 Materials and methods |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
11.2.2 Extraction of 5. leucantha essential oil |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
11.3 Qualitative analysis |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
11.3.1 Phytochemical analysis |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
11.10 Test for glycosides |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
11.11 GCMS analysis of essential oil of S. leucantha |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
11.11.1 GC--MS specification |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
11.12 Collection and processing of crab shells |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
11.13 Isolation and extraction of chitosan from crab shell |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
11.13.1 Structure of chitosan |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
11.14 Chitosan nanoparticles preparation with essential oil |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
11.15 Characterization of essential oil loaded chitosan nanomaterials |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
11.16 H. armigera and S. litura rearing |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
11.17 Rearing of P. xylostella |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
11.18 Toxicity against the H. armigera, S. litura and P. xylostella |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
11.19 Impact on longevity and fecundity of H. armigera, S. litura and P. xylostella |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
11.20 Quantitative food utilization efficiency measures |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
11.21 Amylase, protease, proteinase, and lipase assay |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
11.22 Statistical analysis |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
11.23 Results and discussion |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
11.23.1 Phytochemical screening for essential oil of Salvia leucantha |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
11.25 Characterization of essential oil loaded chitosan nanoparticles |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
11.25.1 UV-VIS spectral analysis of essential oil loaded chitosan nanoparticles |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
11.27 Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
11.28 FTIR analysis of essential oil chitosan nanoparticles |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
11.29 Zeta potential measurements |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
11.30 Larvicidal and pupicidal toxicity against H. armigera, S. litura and P. xylostella |
|
|
170 | (3) |
|
11.31 Impact of S. leucantha essential oil and encapsulated chitosan nanoparticles on insect longevity and fecundity |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
11.32 Food utilization measures |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
11.33 Gut digestive enzymes of H. armigera, S. litura and P. xylostella larvae |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (5) |
|
|
178 | (5) |
|
12 Microbial bio-pesticide as sustainable solution for management of pests: achievements and prospects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
12.1.1 Biochemical pesticides |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
12.1.2 Microbial pesticides |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
12.1.3 Plant incorporated protectants |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
12.2 Biochemical pesticides |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
12.3 The few examples of pheromones used in agricultural pest management are as follows |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
12.3.2 Plant extract biopesticides |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
12.4 Microbial biopesticides |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
12.5 Bacteria as biopesticides |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
12.6 Members of Bacilliaceae as biopesticides (spore formers) |
|
|
185 | (8) |
|
12.6.1 Paenibacillus popilliae (Bacillus popillae) and B. lentimorbus |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
12.6.2 Lysinibacills sphaericus (Bacillus sphaericus) |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
12.6.5 Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
12.6.6 Antimicrobial activity of B. thuringiensis based biopesticides |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
12.6.7 Bacillus thuringiens is used as nano pesticides |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
12.7 Members of Pseudomonadaceae and Enterobacteriaceae as biopesticides (non-spore formers) |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
12.8.1 Fungi as biopesticides |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
12.8.2 Trichoderma spp. as biopesticide |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
12.9 Coniothyrium minitans as biopesticide |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
12.10 Gliocladium catenulatum as biopesticide |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
12.10.1 Purpureocillium lilacinum as biopesticide |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
12.10.2 Beauveria bassiana as biopesticide |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
12.10.3 Lecanicillium (Verticil Hum) lecanii as biopesticide |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
12.10.4 Endophytic fungi as biocontrol agents |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
12.11 Yeast as biocontrol agents |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
12.11.1 Insect viruses as biopesticides |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
12.11.2 Protozoans as biopesticides |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
12.12 Plant incorporated protectants: genetically modified (GM) crops |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
12.13 Advantages of microbial biopesticides |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
12.14 Disadvantages of microbial biopesticides |
|
|
198 | (6) |
|
|
198 | (6) |
|
13 Nano bio pesticide: today and future perspectives |
|
|
|
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
14 Current development, application and constraints of biopesticides in plant disease management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
14.2 History of synthetic pesticides used in plant disease evolution |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
14.3 Current global scenario |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
14.5 Classification of biopesticides |
|
|
209 | (2) |
|
14.6 Microbial biopesticides |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
14.7 Insight into popular fungal and bacterial biopesticides used in plant disease management |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
14.8 Mass production of Trichoderma for commercial purpose |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
14.8.1 Pseudomonas fluorescens |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
14.9 Formulations for P. fluorescens |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
14.9.2 Inorganic carriers |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
14.10.1 Powder formulations |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
14.12 Improvement of formulation efficacy |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
14.13 Molecular approach for improvement of formulation efficacy |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
14.13.1 Protoplast fusion |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
14.13.2 Genetic recombination |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
14.14 Development of compatible consortia for improvement of formulation efficiency |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
14.14.1 Combining various microbes |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
14.14.2 Combining different mode of action |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
14.14.3 Development of strain mixtures |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
14.15 General mode of actions of microbial pesticides against plant pathogens |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
14.17 Biopesticides and their association with growth promoter |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
14.18 Inducer of systemic resistance in plant against plant pathogen |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
14.19 Botanical biopesticides usage against plant pathogen |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
14.21 Advantages and limitations of biopesticides |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
14.22 Factors affecting biopesticides marketing |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
|
221 | (4) |
|
|
221 | (4) |
|
15 Insights into the genomes of microbial biopesticides |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 | (6) |
|
15.1.1 Entomopathogenic bacteria |
|
|
225 | (3) |
|
15.1.2 Entomopathogenic fungi |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
15.1.3 Viral biopesticides |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
15.1.4 Entomopathogenic nematodes |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
15.1.5 Entomopathogenic protozoans |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
15.2 Advantages of genetic manipulation and their commercialization |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
232 | (5) |
|
|
232 | (5) |
|
16 Genetic engineering intervention in crop plants for developing biopesticides |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
16.2 Engineering of Bt genes for insect resistance |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
16.3 Bt cotton adoption in India |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
16.4 Genetic engineering approaches for combating aphid infestation in crop plants |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
16.5 Applications of RNA interference (RNAi) to control pests |
|
|
240 | (1) |
|
16.6 Applications of genome editing to control pests |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
|
242 | (5) |
|
|
242 | (5) |
|
17 Medicinal plants associated microflora as an unexplored niche of biopesticide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
17.1.1 Medicinal plant diversity in India |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
17.1.2 Niche of microflora |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
17.2 Plant-microbe association |
|
|
248 | (6) |
|
17.2.1 Rhizospheric association of microbes |
|
|
248 | (3) |
|
17.2.2 Phyllospheric association of microbes |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
17.2.3 Endophytic microbiome association with medicinal plants |
|
|
251 | (3) |
|
17.3 Relative factors between microflora and plants |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
17.4 Conclusion and future perspectives |
|
|
254 | (7) |
|
|
255 | (6) |
|
18 Trichoderma: a potential biopesticide for sustainable management of wilt disease of crops |
|
|
|
|
|
Soumya Satyanand Shanbhag |
|
|
Manjunatha Amitiganahalli Sampangi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 | (2) |
|
18.2 Trichoderma in the control of wilt disease |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
18.3 Mechanism of biocontrol by Trichoderma in the control of wilt pathogens |
|
|
264 | (6) |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
|
264 | (3) |
|
18.3.3 Cell wall degrading enzymes |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
18.3.4 Antibiosis by antimicrobial metabolites |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
18.3.5 Induced systemic resistance |
|
|
268 | (2) |
|
|
270 | (7) |
|
|
270 | (7) |
|
19 Biological inoculants and biopesticides in small fruit and vegetable production in California |
|
|
|
|
19.1 Bioinoculants in strawberry |
|
|
277 | (2) |
|
19.2 Bioinoculants in tomato |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
19.3 Biopesticides in strawberry and grapes |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
19.4 Biopesticides in vegetables |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
19.5 Non-entomopathogenic roles of hypocrealean entomopathogenic fungi |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
19.6 Strategies and implications for sustainable food production |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
|
281 | (4) |
|
|
282 | (3) |
|
20 Development and regulation of microbial pesticides in the post-genomic era |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
20.2 Development of the microbial biopesticide |
|
|
286 | (2) |
|
20.2.1 Plant growth regulators play crucial role in development of biopesticides |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
20.2.2 Siderophores causes iron limiting conditions for many pathogenic pests |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
20.2.3 Antibiosis, an important criterion for development of the microbial biopesticides |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
20.3 Microbial pesticides: brief description |
|
|
288 | (2) |
|
20.3.1 Bacteria as biopesticides |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
20.3.2 Viruses as biopesticides |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
20.3.3 Fungi as biopesticides |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
20.3.4 Nematodes as biopesticides |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
20.3.5 Protozoan as biopesticides |
|
|
290 | (1) |
|
20.4 Genetic improvements of microbial pesticides |
|
|
290 | (2) |
|
20.5 Regulation and commercialization of microbial pesticides |
|
|
292 | (1) |
|
20.6 Microbial pesticides in the post-genomic era |
|
|
293 | (1) |
|
|
293 | (8) |
|
|
294 | (1) |
|
|
294 | (7) |
|
21 Microbial biopesticides for sustainable agricultural practices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
21.2 Microbial biopesticides |
|
|
302 | (7) |
|
21.2.1 Bacterial biopesticides |
|
|
302 | (2) |
|
21.2.2 Viral biopesticides |
|
|
304 | (2) |
|
21.2.3 Fungal biopesticides/mycopesticides |
|
|
306 | (1) |
|
21.2.4 Nematode biopesticides |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
21.2.5 Protozoan biopesticides |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
21.2.6 Algal biopesticides |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
21.3 Microbial products in biopesticides |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
21.4 Current status of biopesticides in India |
|
|
309 | (3) |
|
21.4.1 Registration norms and regulation of microbial biopesticides |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
21.4.2 Evolution of microbial biopesticides for the management of insect pest in India |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
21.5 Current advancement in the microbial biopesticides in the field of genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics |
|
|
312 | (2) |
|
21.6 Conclusion and future directions |
|
|
314 | (5) |
|
|
314 | (5) |
|
22 Use of microbial consortia for broad spectrum protection of plant pathogens: regulatory hurdles, present status and future prospects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319 | (1) |
|
|
320 | (1) |
|
22.3 Microbial consortium |
|
|
321 | (1) |
|
22.4 Characteristics of microbial consortium |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
22.5 Microbial consortium mediated plant defense mechanism in biological control |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
22.6 Different types of microbial consortium |
|
|
322 | (3) |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
22.6.2 Bacterial and bacterial |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
22.6.3 Fungal and bacterial |
|
|
323 | (2) |
|
22.6.4 Algae and bacteria |
|
|
325 | (1) |
|
22.7 Need for development of biopesticides containing microbial consortium |
|
|
325 | (3) |
|
|
325 | (1) |
|
22.7.2 Microbial pesticides |
|
|
325 | (3) |
|
22.8 Current status of Indian biopesticide sector |
|
|
328 | (1) |
|
22.9 Hurdles in commercialization of microbial based products in India |
|
|
329 | (3) |
|
22.9.1 Regulatory framework and challenges for biopesticides in India |
|
|
330 | (1) |
|
|
331 | (1) |
|
|
332 | (5) |
|
|
332 | (5) |
|
23 Biocides through pyrolytic degradation of biomass: potential, recent advancements and future prospects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337 | (1) |
|
23.1.1 Bio-pesticides: a green alternative to synthetic pesticide |
|
|
338 | (1) |
|
23.2 Pyrolysis-an efficient technology |
|
|
338 | (1) |
|
|
339 | (1) |
|
23.4 Products of pyrolysis |
|
|
339 | (2) |
|
23.5 Acetic acid as potential product |
|
|
341 | (1) |
|
23.5.1 Chemical composition of wood vinegar |
|
|
341 | (1) |
|
23.5.2 Eco-toxicology of pyrolytic products |
|
|
341 | (1) |
|
23.6 Acetic acid eco-toxicology |
|
|
341 | (7) |
|
23.7 Quinone eco-toxicology |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
23.8 Catechol eco-toxicology |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
23.9 Phenol eco-toxicology |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
|
349 | (4) |
|
|
350 | (3) |
|
24 Trichoderma: agricultural applications and beyond |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
24.2 Achieving UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
24.3 Pesticides consumption in the management of pests |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
24.4 Benefits of microbes in rhizosphere |
|
|
354 | (1) |
|
24.5 Soil borne diseases and plant pathogens |
|
|
354 | (29) |
|
24.5.1 Trichoderma--a fungus of unique characteristics |
|
|
354 | (3) |
|
24.5.2 Trichoderma spp. in agricultural application |
|
|
357 | (11) |
|
24.5.3 Trichoderma spp. in sustainable environment |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
24.5.4 Commercialization of Trichoderma spp. |
|
|
368 | (2) |
|
24.5.5 Advantages, challenges, constaints in sustainability of Trichoderma based disease management technology and future course of action |
|
|
370 | (1) |
|
|
371 | (12) |
|
25 Exploring the potential role of Trichoderma as friends of plants foes for bacterial plant pathogens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383 | (1) |
|
|
384 | (7) |
|
25.2.1 Competition with pathogens for space and nutrients |
|
|
384 | (1) |
|
|
385 | (1) |
|
25.2.3 Cell wall degrading enzymes |
|
|
386 | (1) |
|
25.2.4 Plant growth promotion |
|
|
387 | (2) |
|
25.2.5 Induced systemic resistance (ISR) |
|
|
389 | (2) |
|
25.3 Trichogenic-nanoparticles and its application in crop protection |
|
|
391 | (1) |
|
|
392 | (9) |
|
|
392 | (9) |
|
26 Advance molecular tools to detect plant pathogens |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401 | (1) |
|
26.2 Molecular techniques of plant disease detection |
|
|
401 | (1) |
|
26.3 Spectroscopic and imaging techniques |
|
|
402 | (1) |
|
26.4 Fluorescence spectroscopy |
|
|
403 | (1) |
|
26.5 Visible and infrared spectroscopy |
|
|
403 | (2) |
|
26.6 Fluorescence imaging |
|
|
405 | (1) |
|
26.7 Hyper spectral imaging |
|
|
406 | (1) |
|
26.8 Other imaging techniques |
|
|
406 | (1) |
|
26.9 Profiling of plant volatile organic compounds |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
26.10 Electronic nose system |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
|
408 | (1) |
|
26.12 Fluorescence in-situ hybridization |
|
|
409 | (1) |
|
26.13 Hyper spectral techniques |
|
|
409 | (1) |
|
26.14 Biosensor platforms based on nonmaterials |
|
|
409 | (1) |
|
26.15 Affinity biosensors |
|
|
409 | (1) |
|
26.16 Antibody-based biosensors |
|
|
410 | (1) |
|
26.17 DNA/RNA-based affinity biosensor |
|
|
410 | (1) |
|
26.18 Enzymatic electrochemical biosensors |
|
|
410 | (1) |
|
26.19 Bacteriophage based biosensors |
|
|
410 | (1) |
|
26.20 Affinity-based biosensors |
|
|
411 | (1) |
|
26.21 Genetically-encoded biosensors |
|
|
411 | (1) |
|
26.22 Spectroscopic and imaging techniques |
|
|
411 | (1) |
|
26.22.1 Fluorescence spectroscopy |
|
|
411 | (1) |
|
26.22.2 Visible and infrared spectroscopy |
|
|
411 | (1) |
|
|
412 | (5) |
|
|
412 | (5) |
Index |
|
417 | |