Acknowledgements |
|
11 | (16) |
|
|
21 | (6) |
|
|
23 | (4) |
|
|
25 | (2) |
Introduction |
|
27 | (10) |
|
Chapter 1 Generic Reference in English, German, and French |
|
|
37 | (48) |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
1.2 Crosslinguistic Variation of Determiner Phrases with Generic Reference in English, German, and French |
|
|
39 | (21) |
|
1.2.1 Count and Mass Nouns in Subject and Object Position |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
1.2.1.1 Determiner Phrases in Subject Position with Individual- and Stage-Level Predicates |
|
|
47 | (8) |
|
1.2.1.2 Determiner Phrases in Object Position with Intensional and Extensional Predicates |
|
|
55 | (5) |
|
1.3 Theoretical Approaches to Generic Reference |
|
|
60 | (22) |
|
1.3.1 The Nominal Mapping Parameter (Chierchia 1998) |
|
|
69 | (10) |
|
1.3.2 The Universal Scale of Definiteness (Dayal 2004) |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
|
82 | (3) |
|
Chapter 2 Child Second Language Acquisition of Generic Reference |
|
|
85 | (74) |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
2.2 Child Second Language Acquisition |
|
|
87 | (34) |
|
2.2.1 Influential Factors |
|
|
91 | (13) |
|
2.2.2 Child Second Language Development |
|
|
104 | (6) |
|
2.2.3 Individual Variation |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
2.2.4 Child Second Language Acquisition in Immersion Education |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
2.2.4.1 The Immersion Program at Waddell Academy |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
2.2.5 Theoretical Approaches to Second Language Acquisition |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
2.2.5.1 Full Transfer/Full Access Model (Schwartz and Sprouse 1994, 1996) |
|
|
115 | (3) |
|
2.2.5.2 Feature Reassembly Hypothesis (Lardiere 2009) |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
2.2.5.3 Bottleneck Hypothesis (Slabakova 2008, 2016) |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
2.3 Child Second Language Acquisition of Determiner Phrases with Generic Reference in English, German, and French |
|
|
121 | (27) |
|
2.3.1 A Review of the Literature |
|
|
123 | (15) |
|
2.3.2 Learnability of Generic Reference in Child Second Language Acquisition in L2 German and L2 French |
|
|
138 | (10) |
|
2.4 Research Questions and Hypotheses |
|
|
148 | (11) |
|
Chapter 3 The Empirical Study |
|
|
159 | (76) |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
|
160 | (2) |
|
|
162 | (4) |
|
3.4 Predictions for the Experiments |
|
|
166 | (7) |
|
3.4.1 Predictions for the Acceptability Judgment Task (AJT) |
|
|
166 | (4) |
|
3.4.2 Predictions for the Truth Value Judgment Task (TVJT) |
|
|
170 | (3) |
|
3.5 Second Language Proficiency |
|
|
173 | (9) |
|
3.5.1 Student Oral Proficiency Assessment (SOPA) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
3.5.1.1 Methodology, Materials, and Procedure |
|
|
174 | (4) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
3.5.1.3 Results in L2 German and L2 French |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
3.5.2.1 Methodology, Materials, and Procedure |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
3.5.2.3 Results in L2 German and L2 French |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
3.5.3 Proficiency Overall: L2 German and L2 French |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
3.6 Acceptance and Interpretation of Generic Determiner Phrases |
|
|
182 | (53) |
|
3.6.1 Experiment 1: Acceptability Judgment Task |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
3.6.1.1 Methodology, Materials, and Procedure |
|
|
182 | (4) |
|
|
186 | (2) |
|
|
188 | (19) |
|
|
207 | (5) |
|
3.6.2 Experiment 2: Truth Value Judgment Task |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
3.6.2.1 Methodology, Materials, and Procedure |
|
|
212 | (4) |
|
|
216 | (2) |
|
|
218 | (10) |
|
|
228 | (5) |
|
|
233 | (2) |
|
|
235 | (20) |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
4.2 Discussion of Main Findings |
|
|
235 | (15) |
|
4.2.1 The Child L2 Learner's Learning Tasks |
|
|
237 | (2) |
|
4.2.2 Complexity of the Learning Tasks |
|
|
239 | (3) |
|
4.2.3 L2 Developmental Course |
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
4.2.4 Maturational Constraints |
|
|
244 | (3) |
|
|
247 | (3) |
|
4.3 Implications for Second Language Teaching in Immersion Education |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
4.4 Limitations of the Present Study |
|
|
251 | (1) |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
|
253 | (2) |
Conclusion |
|
255 | (4) |
References |
|
259 | (26) |
Appendix |
|
285 | |