Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Coercive Brain-Reading in Criminal Justice: An Analysis of European Human Rights Law

(Tilburg University, The Netherlands)
  • Formatas: PDF+DRM
  • Serija: Law and the Cognitive Sciences
  • Išleidimo metai: 01-Sep-2022
  • Leidėjas: Cambridge University Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781009252485
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Coercive Brain-Reading in Criminal Justice: An Analysis of European Human Rights LawDidesnis paveikslėlis
  • Formatas: PDF+DRM
  • Serija: Law and the Cognitive Sciences
  • Išleidimo metai: 01-Sep-2022
  • Leidėjas: Cambridge University Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781009252485
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

This book examines the legal boundaries of non-consensual brain-reading in criminal justice. Focusing on human rights such as privacy and freedom of thought and expression, the book informs lawyers and ethicists debating the legal implications of emerging neurotechnology and advises policymakers and judges in specifying the law to neurotechnology.

Emerging neurotechnology offers increasingly individualised brain information, enabling researchers to identify mental states and content. When accurate and valid, these brain-reading technologies also provide data that could be useful in criminal legal procedures, such as memory detection with EEG and the prediction of recidivism with fMRI. Yet, unlike in medicine, individuals involved in criminal cases will often be reluctant to undergo brain-reading procedures. This raises the question of whether coercive brain-reading could be permissible in criminal law. Coercive Brain-Reading in Criminal Justice examines this question in view of European human rights: the prohibition of ill-treatment, the right to privacy, freedom of thought, freedom of expression, and the privilege against self-incrimination. The book argues that, at present, the established framework of human rights does not exclude coercive brain-reading. It does, however, delimit the permissible use of forensic brain-reading without valid consent. This cautionary, cutting-edge book lays a crucial foundation for understanding the future of criminal legal proceedings in a world of ever-advancing neurotechnology.

Recenzijos

'Should our criminal justice systems adopt new neuroimaging technologies for the purposes of determining responsibility, establishing guilt or assessing risk of recidivism? Ligthart traces the myriad ways in which European human rights law bears on this question. His book provides a compelling, lucid and even-handed analysis, and is essential reading for anyone interested in the ethical and legal status of forensic brain-reading.' Tom Douglas, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford 'This important book, by one of the leaders of the new generation of neurolaw scholars, effectively challenges complacent assumptions that existing European safeguards provide adequate protection to the threats to human rights arising from neurotechnologies. A 'must-read' for policymakers, legislators and all who care about human rights.' Paul Catley, Professor of Neurolaw and Honorary Associate, The Open University

Daugiau informacijos

This book examines the legal boundaries of non-consensual brain-reading in criminal justice, focusing on human rights like freedom of thought.
List of Tables
xi
Acknowledgements xiii
List of Abbreviations
xv
1 Setting the Stage: Why `Reading' Brains Raises Fundamental Legal Questions for European Human Rights Law
1(8)
1.1 Introduction
1(3)
1.2 Coercive Brain-Reading in Criminal Law: Focus on Europe
4(5)
2 Brain-Reading Technologies: Their Legally Relevant Features
9(26)
2.1 Introduction
9(1)
2.2 Brain-Based Lie Detection
10(4)
2.2.1 Type of Information and Legal Relevance
10(1)
2.2.2 Technological Features
11(3)
2.3 Brain-Based Detection of Recognition: The P∞-Based CIT
14(5)
2.3.1 Type of Information and Legal Relevance
14(2)
2.3.2 Technological Features
16(3)
2.4 Brain-Based Diagnostics
19(4)
2.4.1 Type of Information and Legal Relevance
19(2)
2.4.2 Technological Features
21(2)
2.5 Neuroprediction
23(3)
2.5.1 Type of Information and Legal Relevance
23(2)
2.5.2 Technological Features
25(1)
2.6 Neural Representation of Real-Time Thoughts
26(1)
2.7 Coercion: Physical and Volitional
27(7)
2.7.1 Introduction
27(2)
2.7.2 Coercion: Threats, Baselines, and (Coercive) Offers
29(5)
2.8 Conclusion
34(1)
3 Coercive Brain-Reading and the Prohibition of Ill-Treatment
35(33)
3.1 Introduction
35(1)
3.2 The Prohibition of Ill-Treatment (Article 3 ECHR)
36(3)
3.3 Coercive Brain-Reading under the Prohibition of Ill-Treatment
39(28)
3.3.1 Introduction
39(1)
3.3.2 Coercive Forensic Brain-Reading: An Analogy with Forcible Medical Procedures to Obtain Evidence
40(1)
3.3.3 Forcible Medical Procedures to Obtain Evidence in Light of Article 3 ECHR
41(10)
3.3.4 Coercive Forensic Brain-Reading under the Prohibition of Ill-Treatment
51(16)
3.4 Conclusion
67(1)
4 Coercive Brain-Reading and the Right to Respect for Private Life
68(44)
4.1 Introduction
68(1)
4.2 The Right to Respect for Private Life (Article 8 ECHR)
68(11)
4.2.1 Introduction
68(1)
4.2.2 Article 8(1) ECHR: The Right to Respect for Private Life
69(7)
4.2.3 Article 8(2) ECHR: Justifying Infringements
76(2)
4.2.4 Conclusion
78(1)
4.3 Coercive Forensic Brain-Reading under the Right to Respect for Private Life
79(32)
4.3.1 Introduction
79(1)
4.3.2 Coercive Forensic Brain-Reading: An Analogy with Forensic DNA Testing
79(3)
4.3.3 Forensic Collection and Storage of DNA in Light of Article 8 ECHR
82(8)
4.3.4 Coercive Forensic Brain-Reading under the Right to Respect for Private Life
90(21)
4.4 Conclusion
111(1)
5 Coercive Brain-Reading and the Rights to Freedom of Thought and to Freedom of Expression
112(41)
5.1 Introduction
112(2)
5.2 The Right to Freedom of Thought (Article 9 ECHR)
114(16)
5.2.1 Introduction
114(1)
5.2.2 Legal History
115(8)
5.2.3 Case-Law and Literature
123(6)
5.2.4 Conclusion
129(1)
5.3 Coercive Brain-Reading under the Right to Freedom of Thought
130(9)
5.3.1 Introduction
130(1)
5.3.2 Coercive Brain-Reading: An Analog} with Obligatory Witness Testimonies
130(2)
5.3.3 Would the Freedom of Thought Protect against Coercive Forensic Brain-Reading?
132(2)
5.3.4 Should the Right to Freedom of Thought Be Reconsidered?
134(4)
5.3.5 Conclusion
138(1)
5.4 Coercive Brain-Reading and the Right to Freedom of Expression
139(12)
5.4.1 Introduction
139(1)
5.4.2 The Right to Freedom of Non-expression (Article 10 KCIIR)
140(5)
5.4.3 Coercive Forensic Brain-Reading under the Freedom of Non-expression
145(6)
5.4.4 Synthesis
151(1)
5.5 Conclusion
151(2)
6 Coercive Brain-Reading and the Privilege against Self-incrimination
153(45)
6.1 Introduction
153(1)
6.2 The Privilege against Self-incrimination (Article 6 FCIIR)
154(20)
6.2.1 Introduction
154(1)
6.2.2 Applicability of the Privilege
154(12)
6.2.3 Violating the Privilege against Self-incrimination: Three Relevant Factors
166(8)
6.2.4 Conclusion
174(1)
6.3 Coercive Forensic Brain-Reading under the Privilege against Self-incrimination
174(22)
6.3.1 Introduction
174(1)
6.3.2 Applicability of the Privilege to Coercive Forensic Brain-Reading
175(14)
6.3.3 Violating the Privilege?
189(2)
6.3.4 The Privilege's Rationales
191(5)
6.4 Conclusion
196(2)
7 Procedural Implications of Brain-Reading in Breach of the ECHR: Excluding Unlawfully Obtained Evidence?
198(41)
7.1 Introduction
198(1)
7.2 Unlawfully Obtained Evidence and the Right to a Fair Trial (Article 6 ECHR)
198(29)
7.2.1 Introduction
198(1)
7.2.2 Evidence Obtained in Breach of Article 6 ECHR: The Privilege against Self-incrimination
199(2)
7.2.3 Evidence Obtained in Breach of Article 8 ECHR
201(4)
7.2.4 Evidence Obtained in Breach of Article 3 ECHR
205(4)
7.2.5 Reflecting on the Court's Approach
209(16)
7.2.6 Synthesis
225(2)
7.3 Forensic Brain-Reading in Breach of the ECHR: Excluding Evidence under Article 6 ECHR?
227(11)
7.3.1 Introduction
227(1)
7.3.2 Violating the Privilege against Self-incrimination (Article 6 ECHR)
228(1)
7.3.3 Violating the Prohibition of Ill-Treatment (Article 3 ECHR)
229(3)
7.3.4 Violating the Right to Freedom of Thought (Article 9 ECHR)
232(3)
7.3.5 Violating the Right to Respect for Private Life (Article 8 ECHR)
235(1)
7.3.6 Violating the Right to Freedom of Non-expression (Article 10 ECHR)
236(2)
7.4 Conclusion
238(1)
8 Discussion and Perspectives: Emerging Challenges for European Human Rights Law
239(23)
8.1 Introduction
239(1)
8.2 Coercion, Manipulation, and Persuasion
239(4)
8.3 Protecting Brains and Minds
243(17)
8.3.1 Current Protection
243(2)
8.3.2 Reconsidering the Foundations of the Privilege against Self-incrimination
245(8)
8.3.3 Specifying the Right to Freedom of Non-expression
253(7)
8.4 Conclusion
260(2)
9 Concluding Observations
262(5)
Bibliography 267(22)
Index 289
Sjors Ligthart is assistant professor in the Department of Criminal Law at Tilburg Law School and postdoctoral researcher at the Willem Pompe Institute for Criminal Law and Criminology at Utrecht University His research interests include human rights over the mind and the legal implications of brain-reading, neurointerventions, virtual reality, and persuasive technologies in criminal justice. He is co-editor of Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice & Security (2021).
Daugiau apie elektronines knygas Daugiau apie elektronines knygas
Pastovi nuoroda: https://www.kriso.lt/db/97810092524852e.html
Raktažodžiai: