Contributors |
|
xxi | |
Foreword |
|
xxvii | |
|
|
PART I THE ROLE OF CONSENT |
|
|
1 | (82) |
|
1 Transatlantic Perspectives: Fundamental Themes and Debates |
|
|
3 | (11) |
|
|
3 | (9) |
|
A Commercial Contract Law in the United Kingdom and United States |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1 Statutory Interventions into the Common Law |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
2 Divergence, Convergence, and Law Reform |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
3 Theories of Contract, Networks, and Equity |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
4 Discrete and Relational Contracting |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
5 Implied Terms and Contract Interpretation |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
6 Contract Law's Regulatory Function |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
7 Misrepresentation and Breach |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
8 Contract and Sales Law Harmonization |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
2 Competing Theories of Contract: An Emerging Consensus? |
|
|
14 | (27) |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
II The Competing Theories of Contract |
|
|
17 | (13) |
|
A Contract as Based upon Promises |
|
|
17 | (5) |
|
B Contract as Based upon Agreement |
|
|
22 | (4) |
|
C Contract as Based upon the Reliance |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
D Contract as Based upon the Assumption of Legally Binding Obligations |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
E Contract as Based upon the Transfer of Rights |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
F Contract as Based upon Relationship |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
G Conclusion on Competing Theories of Contract |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
III Connections between Competing Theories of Contract |
|
|
30 | (6) |
|
IV Future Developments of Contract Theory: An Emerging Consensus? |
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
3 Contracts, Courts, and the Construction of Consent |
|
|
41 | (26) |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
II Conflation of Efficiency and Consent |
|
|
44 | (6) |
|
III Illusory Nature of Party-Centrism |
|
|
50 | (6) |
|
IV Candor in the Judicial Construction of Consent |
|
|
56 | (8) |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
4 Are Mortgage Contracts Promises? |
|
|
67 | (16) |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
II Why Do People Make Promises? |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
III Are Contracts Promises? |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
IV Are Mortgage Contracts Typically Promises? |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
V If Modern Mortgage Contracts Are Typically Not Promises, Is Strategic Default Morally Acceptable After All? |
|
|
76 | (4) |
|
|
80 | (3) |
|
PART II NORMATIVE VIEWS OF CONTRACT |
|
|
83 | (96) |
|
|
85 | (31) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
II Essential Normativity of Contract Doctrine |
|
|
87 | (9) |
|
III Minimum Content of Natural Contract Law |
|
|
96 | (3) |
|
|
99 | (2) |
|
|
101 | (9) |
|
VI Is Naturalism Fallacious? |
|
|
110 | (4) |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
6 Contract in a Networked World |
|
|
116 | (30) |
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
|
119 | (8) |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
D Reasonable Expectations |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
III The Basis for Network Effects: Consumer Contracts |
|
|
127 | (5) |
|
A The Nature of the Modern Regulation of Consumer Transactions |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
B Networks and OFT v. Lloyds TSB |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
1 The Legislative Approach |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
3 The Boyack Hypothetical |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
4 Beyond OFT v. Lloyds TSB |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
IV The Basis for Network Effects: Commercial Contracts |
|
|
132 | (10) |
|
A The Nature of the Modern Regulation of Commercial Transactions |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
B The "Hoffmannisation" of Contract Law |
|
|
134 | (4) |
|
C Network Effects and The Eurymedon |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
D Beware the Classical Inheritance |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
E Big Businesses, Small Businesses, and Shopping Malls |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
V The Basis for Network Effects: Private Contracts |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
7 Contract Transactions and Equity |
|
|
146 | (33) |
|
|
147 | (3) |
|
II Equity in a Contractual Context |
|
|
150 | (5) |
|
III Equitable Principles and Contract Law |
|
|
155 | (14) |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
B The Contractual Solution |
|
|
156 | (8) |
|
|
164 | (5) |
|
|
169 | (7) |
|
A A Complex Transactional Web |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
B The Difficulty of Dealing with the Obligation |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
C A Relational Attempt to Deal with this Difficulty |
|
|
174 | (1) |
|
D Indeterminacy and Vulnerability |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (3) |
|
PART III CONTRACT DESIGN AND GOOD FAITH |
|
|
179 | (44) |
|
8 The Duty to Draft Reasonably and Online Contracts |
|
|
181 | (20) |
|
|
181 | (3) |
|
II Modern Contracts and the Diminishing of Consent |
|
|
184 | (3) |
|
|
187 | (3) |
|
IV Code as Law and Form as Function |
|
|
190 | (10) |
|
A Transactional Hurdles or "Contracts as Checkout Line" |
|
|
194 | (4) |
|
B Visualization Strategies or "Contracts as Road Signs and Traffic Lights" |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
C Sensorial Landscaping or "Contracts as Neighborhoods" |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
9 Managing Change in Uncertain Times: Relational View of Good Faith |
|
|
201 | (22) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
II Long-Term and Complex Outsourcing Contracts |
|
|
202 | (4) |
|
III A Limited Recognition of Good Faith |
|
|
206 | (7) |
|
IV Does the Restricted Approach to Good Faith Accord with Practice? |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
V Theory of Relational Contract |
|
|
214 | (2) |
|
VI A Construct of Good Faith as Seen through a Relational Prism |
|
|
216 | (4) |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
B Criticisms of the Construct |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
C Should Such a Construct Be Accepted? |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
|
220 | (3) |
|
PART IV IMPLIED TERMS AND INTERPRETATION |
|
|
223 | (64) |
|
10 Implied Terms in English Contract Law |
|
|
225 | (15) |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
II The Historical Development of the Implied Term |
|
|
226 | (7) |
|
|
226 | (2) |
|
B Creation of Implied Terms |
|
|
228 | (5) |
|
|
233 | (5) |
|
|
238 | (2) |
|
11 Contract Interpretation: Judicial Role Not Parties' Choice |
|
|
240 | (47) |
|
I Introduction: Challenging Party Choice Theory |
|
|
241 | (8) |
|
II The Importance of a Judicial Interpretation Rule |
|
|
249 | (6) |
|
III Faulty Assumptions Underlie the New Formalists' Opt-in Rule |
|
|
255 | (8) |
|
IV Reducing Party Costs and Risks |
|
|
263 | (5) |
|
V The Opt-in Rule Should be Justified Like any Other Common Law Doctrine |
|
|
268 | (4) |
|
VI Rawlsian Theory, Contextual Evidence, Consequentialist Analysis, Equity, and Probabilistic Models Support a Judicial Interpretation Rule |
|
|
272 | (3) |
|
VII Courts, Restatements, and Empirical Evidence Challenge Party Choice Theory |
|
|
275 | (9) |
|
A Jacob & Youngs: Should Goals Affect Interpretation? |
|
|
275 | (4) |
|
B Residual Uncertainty: Overall Objectives and Prospective Consequences |
|
|
279 | (3) |
|
C When Should Trade Usage Govern Meaning? |
|
|
282 | (2) |
|
|
284 | (3) |
|
PART V POLICING CONTRACTING BEHAVIOR |
|
|
287 | (96) |
|
12 The Paradox of the French Method for Calculating the Compensation of Commercial Agents and the Importance of Conceptualising the Remedial Scheme under Directive 86/653 |
|
|
289 | (20) |
|
|
290 | (3) |
|
II The Different Interpretations on the Calculation of "Compensation" between France and UK |
|
|
293 | (10) |
|
III Reconciling Compensation and Indemnity? |
|
|
303 | (4) |
|
|
307 | (2) |
|
13 Unconscionability in American Contract Law: A Twenty-First-Century Survey |
|
|
309 | (30) |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
II Mid-Twentieth-Century Development - the 1950s and 1960s |
|
|
310 | (3) |
|
III Further Development - the 1970s and 1980s |
|
|
313 | (1) |
|
IV Unconscionability at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century |
|
|
314 | (23) |
|
A Unconscionability as Applied to Mandatory Arbitration Clauses |
|
|
315 | (5) |
|
B Unconscionability in Non-Arbitration Cases - Doctrinal Developments |
|
|
320 | (1) |
|
|
320 | (2) |
|
|
322 | (2) |
|
|
324 | (1) |
|
C Unconscionability in Action: Recent Examples |
|
|
325 | (1) |
|
1 Sales and Leases of Goods |
|
|
326 | (1) |
|
|
327 | (1) |
|
|
328 | (2) |
|
4 Real Estate Transactions |
|
|
330 | (3) |
|
5 Consumer Lending and Credit |
|
|
333 | (4) |
|
|
337 | (2) |
|
14 Unfair Terms in Comparative Perspective: Software Contracts |
|
|
339 | (27) |
|
|
340 | (3) |
|
II The Challenge to Contract Theory Presented by SFKs |
|
|
343 | (4) |
|
III US Law Reform and Software Contracts |
|
|
347 | (12) |
|
A Advance Disclosure and a Step for Active Assent |
|
|
349 | (2) |
|
B Reducing the Impact of Product Flaws |
|
|
351 | (1) |
|
C Remedies and Dispute Resolution |
|
|
352 | (2) |
|
D Protecting Intellectual Property Rights |
|
|
354 | (5) |
|
IV Unfair Terms in Comparative Perspective |
|
|
359 | (5) |
|
A ALI Principles and the EU Unfair Contract Terms Directive: Differences |
|
|
360 | (2) |
|
B ALI Principles and the EU Unfair Contract Terms Directive: Similarities |
|
|
362 | (2) |
|
|
364 | (2) |
|
15 (D)CFR Initiative and Consumer Unfair Terms |
|
|
366 | (17) |
|
|
366 | (1) |
|
II Evolution of the (D)CFR Initiative |
|
|
367 | (1) |
|
III Rationale for EU Private Law Consolidation |
|
|
368 | (3) |
|
IV (D)CFR Initiative and the Effective Policing of Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts |
|
|
371 | (10) |
|
A National Judges' Elaboration of Europeanised Unfairness Standards |
|
|
373 | (2) |
|
B Judicial Approach to Article 267 TFEU References |
|
|
375 | (2) |
|
C (Non-harmonised) National Background Rules |
|
|
377 | (1) |
|
D Towards a Multi-Dimensional Perspective |
|
|
378 | (1) |
|
E Procedural Dimension: Collective Proceedings |
|
|
379 | (2) |
|
|
381 | (2) |
|
PART VI MISREPRESENTATION, BREACH, AND REMEDIES |
|
|
383 | (120) |
|
16 Remedies for Misrepresentation: An Integrated System |
|
|
385 | (31) |
|
|
386 | (1) |
|
|
387 | (2) |
|
|
389 | (11) |
|
A Rescission as a Self-Help Remedy? |
|
|
389 | (1) |
|
|
390 | (1) |
|
|
390 | (2) |
|
|
392 | (1) |
|
|
393 | (1) |
|
F When Restitutio in Integrum Is Impossible |
|
|
394 | (1) |
|
|
395 | (4) |
|
|
399 | (1) |
|
|
400 | (14) |
|
|
401 | (1) |
|
B Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Deceit) |
|
|
402 | (1) |
|
|
403 | (1) |
|
D Negligent Misrepresentation |
|
|
404 | (5) |
|
E Innocent Misrepresentation |
|
|
409 | (4) |
|
F Comparative Perspectives |
|
|
413 | (1) |
|
V Conclusion - Integrating Damages with Rescission |
|
|
414 | (2) |
|
17 Re-Examining Damages for Fraudulent Misrepresentation: Towards a More Measured Response to Compensation and Deterrence |
|
|
416 | (18) |
|
|
417 | (1) |
|
II The Crucible of Misrepresentation |
|
|
417 | (1) |
|
III Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Causation |
|
|
418 | (4) |
|
IV Impact on Risk Allocation |
|
|
422 | (1) |
|
V Negligent Contractual Misrepresentation |
|
|
423 | (1) |
|
VI Accentuating the Punishment |
|
|
424 | (2) |
|
|
426 | (1) |
|
|
427 | (1) |
|
IX Further Dangers of the Compensation Myth |
|
|
428 | (2) |
|
X Availability of Exemplary Damages for Fraudulent Misrepresentation |
|
|
430 | (1) |
|
|
431 | (1) |
|
|
432 | (2) |
|
18 Remedies for a Documentary Breach: English Law and the CISG |
|
|
434 | (32) |
|
|
435 | (1) |
|
|
436 | (24) |
|
A Duality of the Rights to Reject and Terminate |
|
|
436 | (7) |
|
B Rejection or Termination |
|
|
443 | (5) |
|
C Rejection and Termination |
|
|
448 | (12) |
|
|
460 | (4) |
|
|
464 | (2) |
|
19 The Irrelevance of the Performance Interest: A Comparative Analysis of "Keep-Open" Covenants in Scotland and England |
|
|
466 | (37) |
|
|
467 | (4) |
|
II Scots Law of Keep-Open Covenants |
|
|
471 | (1) |
|
III Why Would Commercial Parties Ever Seek Literal Enforcement? |
|
|
471 | (11) |
|
IV Enforcement of Keep-Open Obligations under the English Law |
|
|
482 | (4) |
|
V The Wisdom of Lord Justice Millet |
|
|
486 | (3) |
|
VI Supervisory Problems in the Law of Keep-Open Covenants |
|
|
489 | (5) |
|
VII Commercial Uniqueness Cases |
|
|
494 | (1) |
|
VIII Advice to English Landlords |
|
|
495 | (1) |
|
IX Changing the Default Law, Commercial Leasing, and the Irrelevance of the Performance Interest |
|
|
496 | (5) |
|
|
501 | (2) |
|
PART VII HARMONIZING CONTRACT LAW |
|
|
503 | (78) |
|
20 Harmonisation of European Contract Law: Default and Mandatory Rules |
|
|
505 | (24) |
|
|
505 | (1) |
|
II Default and Mandatory Rules: A Comparison |
|
|
506 | (3) |
|
III Justifications for the Harmonisation of European Contract Law |
|
|
509 | (6) |
|
IV Harmonisation of Default Rules |
|
|
515 | (6) |
|
V Harmonisation of Mandatory Rules |
|
|
521 | (6) |
|
|
527 | (2) |
|
21 Europeanisation of Contract Law and the Proposed Common European Sales Law |
|
|
529 | (30) |
|
I Introduction: Proposed Common European Sales Law |
|
|
530 | (9) |
|
II A Historical Scottish Perspective |
|
|
539 | (6) |
|
III Comparing the Proposed CESL with the UK Sale of Goods Act |
|
|
545 | (11) |
|
|
546 | (1) |
|
|
547 | (3) |
|
|
550 | (2) |
|
D Termination: The Right to Reject |
|
|
552 | (4) |
|
|
556 | (1) |
|
|
556 | (3) |
|
22 Harmonization of International Sales Law |
|
|
559 | (22) |
|
|
560 | (1) |
|
II Goal of Harmonizing International Sales Law |
|
|
560 | (11) |
|
A Substantive Shortcomings |
|
|
561 | (1) |
|
1 Problem of Reservations |
|
|
562 | (1) |
|
|
563 | (1) |
|
B Uniformity of Application and National Law Bias |
|
|
564 | (1) |
|
1 Nationally Biased Interpretations |
|
|
564 | (1) |
|
2 Uniformity Principle and the Problem of Divergent Interpretations |
|
|
565 | (5) |
|
C Widespread Approval and Widespread Disregard |
|
|
570 | (1) |
|
III Uniformity in Practice and the Problem of Scarcity |
|
|
571 | (4) |
|
A Civil-Common Law Divide |
|
|
572 | (1) |
|
B German Role in CISG Jurisprudence |
|
|
572 | (2) |
|
C Understated Role of Unreported Arbitration Cases |
|
|
574 | (1) |
|
|
575 | (1) |
|
IV Value of the CISG outside the Context of International Harmonization |
|
|
575 | (3) |
|
A CISG as Customary International Law and as Soft Law |
|
|
576 | (1) |
|
B Use as a Model National Law |
|
|
577 | (1) |
|
|
578 | (3) |
Index |
|
581 | |