Atnaujinkite slapukø nuostatas

El. knyga: The Constitutional Structure of Europe’s Area of ‘Freedom, Security and Justice’ and the Right to Justification

(University of Gothenburg, Sweden)
Kitos knygos pagal ðià temà:
The Constitutional Structure of Europe’s Area of ‘Freedom, Security and Justice’ and the Right to JustificationDidesnis paveikslëlis
Kitos knygos pagal ðià temà:

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidþiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidþiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeniniø teisiø valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikë ðià knygà ðifruota forma, o tai reiðkia, kad norint jà atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia ádiegti nemokamà programinæ árangà. Norint skaityti ðià el. knygà, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  èia. El. knygà galima atsisiøsti á 6 árenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo paèiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinë áranga
    Norint skaityti ðià el. knygà mobiliajame árenginyje (telefone ar planðetiniame kompiuteryje), turite ádiegti ðià nemokamà programëlæ: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti ðià el. knygà asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nëra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurià tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti ðios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

This book explores the implications of freedom as a non-domination-oriented view for understanding EU security regulation and its constitutional implications. At a time when the European borders are under pressure and with the refugee and migration crisis, which escalated in 2015, the idea of exploring a constitutional theory for the 'Area of Freedom, Security and Justice' (AFSJ) might seem to be a utopian project. This appears especially true in the light of the increased threat of terrorism in Europe (and on a global scale) and where the expanding EU security agenda is often advanced through the administrative law path, in contrast to the constitutional trajectory. Add to this the prolonged financial crisis, which continues to cast a long shadow on the future development of EU integration, and which suggests that Europe needs to 're-invent itself' beyond the sphere of economics. Therefore, it is precisely because of the current uncertainties regarding the progress of the EU and the constitutional law project that a constitutional take on the AFSJ is of particular importance. The book investigates the meaning of non-domination and the idea of justice and justification in the area of EU security regulation. In doing so, it focuses on the development of an AFSJ, what it means, and why it represents a fascinating example of contemporary constitutional law with interacting layers of security regulation, human rights law and transnational legal theory at its core.

Recenzijos

The analysis presented in the book provides more classic discussion points around the AFSJ with robust philosophical foundations. The conceptual richness of the volume sparks a number of follow-up questions that will be hopefully investigated in the future. This piece of scholarship fills a gap in the existing literature by offering a more systemic understanding of the functioning of the AFSJ, and offers an original angle to assess long-standing questions of constitutional relevance. -- Leandro Mancano * Common Market Law Review * Herlin-Karnell brings a different perspective to the table and points to the big picture, with well-articulated and compelling arguments that seek to advance the debate in the field of EU criminal law. -- Konstantinos Zoumpoulakis, Leiden Law School * New Journal of European Criminal Law * It is interesting how Herlin-Karnell connects the topics of non-domination theory, the right to justification and the proportionality principle. This is an added value indeed the very many questions discussed, the thorough analysis of scholarship and case-law offer a very decent basis for further investigations in European criminal law. -- Attila Vincze, Andrassy University Budapest * Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law *

Daugiau informacijos

Original research on the constitutional structure of Europe's Area of Security, Freedom and Justice, an increasingly topical and important area of constitutional and EU law, publishing in Hart's new series, Hart Studies in Security and Justice.
Acknowledgements v
List of Abbreviations
xi
Table of Cases
xiii
Table of Legislation
xv
PART I
1 Introduction
3(14)
I The Idea of the Book
3(2)
II The Structure of the Book
5(4)
A Part I
6(1)
B Part II
7(1)
C Part III
8(1)
III Why Constitutionalism Matters for Constructing the AFSJ Sphere
9(2)
IV Introduction to the Contested Concept of Justice and the EU Security Status Quo
11(2)
V Justice, EU Legal Debate and the External Aspect
13(2)
VI Conclusion
15(2)
2 The Concept of Non-domination in the EU Security-related Context
17(22)
I Introduction
17(2)
II The Concept of `Freedom as Non-domination' as a Constitutional Set-up: Charting the Main Debate
19(6)
A Coercion and Domination in Power Structures
22(3)
III Non-domination, Justice and EU Security Regulation
25(3)
IV Legitimacy and Justification
28(4)
V Judicial Review and Non-domination
32(2)
VI Translating the `Non-domination' Question to the Supranational EU Level and its Relevance for EU Security Regulation
34(1)
VII Introduction to the Links between Justification and Proportionality in the Context of Non-domination
35(1)
VIII Conclusion
36(3)
PART II
3 The Right to Justification, Justice and the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice
39(23)
I Introduction
39(3)
II Justice as a Contested Concept
42(4)
III Justice and on the Constitutional Structure
46(4)
A The Concepts of Justice and Dignity: Kantian Themes
48(2)
IV The Idea of Justification, Democracy and the Question of Legitimacy
50(4)
A Justification, Public Reason and Fiduciary Law
51(3)
V The Ideal and Non-ideal Picture of Justice
54(2)
VI Constitutional Essentials, Public Reason and Judicial Review
56(3)
VII Same for States and Citizens? The EU Context
59(1)
VIII Conclusion
60(2)
4 Proportionality and Reasonable Disagreement in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice
62(37)
I Introduction
62(3)
II Proportionality in the AFSJ and Beyond
65(3)
III Proportionality Discourse: Introductory Remarks to a Grand Debate
68(2)
IV An Umbrella Principle of Proportionality in EU Law
70(3)
V Proportionality on the EU Legislative Table
73(5)
A Charter of Fundamental Rights and Proportionality
74(2)
B Margin of Appreciation and the ECHR
76(2)
VI The New Contours of Proportionality within the AFSJ: Case Law
78(7)
VII Critique and Appraisal of the Proportionality Principle
85(5)
VIII The Turn to Justification: Proportionality as Reasonable Disagreement
90(2)
IX Proportionality and Justice as a Force for Good AFSJ Structure?
92(2)
X Conclusion: Non-domination Utilised Through Proportionality?
94(5)
PART III
5 The Right to Justification, Territoriality and Migration, Refugees and Terrorism
99(37)
I Introduction
99(4)
A Status Quo and Security
100(3)
II The Decent Society and its Borders: Some Key Debates Explored
103(8)
A The Right to Justification: Theory and Human Rights
109(2)
III Migration Ethics and the AFSJ Challenge
111(8)
A The EU Migration and Refugee Crisis and the Notion of Mixed Migration
113(6)
IV Anti-terrorism, Security and Prevention
119(8)
A The Question of Jurisdiction and Recent Security Measures
123(4)
V Adjudication and Security in Real Time
127(2)
VI Agencies and the Accountability Deficit
129(3)
VII What Kind of Justification for What Kind of Solidarity?
132(2)
VIII Conclusion
134(2)
6 The Dimensions of Constitutional Justice: The Multi-Speed Scenario
136(19)
I Introduction
136(2)
II Justice and Fragmentation: Cherry-picking AFSJ Standards
138(5)
III Constitutional Justice, Trust and the CJEU
143(5)
IV The Court of Justice as a Trustee Court in the AFSJ?
148(4)
V National Courts and Fiduciary Obligations: When the EU Standard is not Robust Enough
152(2)
VI Conclusion
154(1)
7 Conclusion
155(6)
I Conclusion
155(4)
A Summary of the Arguments
156(3)
II The Justification of the Book
159(2)
Bibliography 161(14)
Index 175
Ester Herlin-Karnell is Professor in EU Law, University Research Chair of EU Constitutional Law and Justice, and the Director of the VU Centre for European Legal Studies at the Free University of Amsterdam.
Daugiau apie elektronines knygas Daugiau apie elektronines knygas
Pastovi nuoroda: https://www.kriso.lt/db/97815099125132e.html
Raktaþodþiai: