|
|
|
1 Motivation: Multiobjective Thinking in Controller Tuning |
|
|
3 | (20) |
|
1.1 Controller Tuning as a Multiobjective Optimization Problem: A Simple Example |
|
|
3 | (17) |
|
1.2 Conclusions on This Chapter |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
2 Background on Multiobjective Optimization for Controller Tuning |
|
|
23 | (36) |
|
|
23 | (4) |
|
2.2 Multiobjective Optimization Design (MOOD) Procedure |
|
|
27 | (14) |
|
2.2.1 Multiobjective Problem (MOP) Definition |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization (EMO) |
|
|
29 | (8) |
|
2.2.3 MultiCriteria Decision Making (MCDM) |
|
|
37 | (4) |
|
2.3 Related Work in Controller Tuning |
|
|
41 | (9) |
|
2.3.1 Basic Design Objectives in Frequency Domain |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
2.3.2 Basic Design Objectives in Time Domain |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
2.3.3 PI-PID Controller Design Concept |
|
|
44 | (3) |
|
2.3.4 Fuzzy Controller Design Concept |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
2.3.5 State Space Feedback Controller Design Concept |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
2.3.6 Predictive Control Design Concept |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
2.4 Conclusions on This Chapter |
|
|
50 | (9) |
|
|
51 | (8) |
|
3 Tools for the Multiobjective Optimization Design Procedure |
|
|
59 | (32) |
|
|
59 | (16) |
|
3.1.1 Evolutionary Technique |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
3.1.2 A MOEA with Convergence Capabilities: MODE |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
3.1.3 An MODE with Diversity Features: sp-MODE |
|
|
63 | (6) |
|
3.1.4 An sp-MODE with Pertinency Features: sp-MODE-II |
|
|
69 | (6) |
|
|
75 | (12) |
|
3.2.1 Preferences in MCDM Stage Using Utility Functions |
|
|
76 | (3) |
|
3.2.2 Level Diagrams for Pareto Front Analysis |
|
|
79 | (3) |
|
3.2.3 Level Diagrams for Design Concepts Comparison |
|
|
82 | (5) |
|
3.3 Conclusions of This Chapter |
|
|
87 | (4) |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
|
|
4 Controller Tuning for Univariable Processes |
|
|
91 | (16) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (10) |
|
4.4 Performance of Some Available Tuning Rules |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
|
104 | (3) |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
5 Controller Tuning for Multivariable Processes |
|
|
107 | (16) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
5.2 Model Description and Control Problem |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
|
109 | (8) |
|
|
117 | (4) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
6 Comparing Control Structures from a Multiobjective Perspective |
|
|
123 | (24) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
6.2 Model and Controllers Description |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
|
126 | (17) |
|
6.3.1 Two Objectives Approach |
|
|
126 | (5) |
|
6.3.2 Three Objectives Approach |
|
|
131 | (12) |
|
|
143 | (4) |
|
|
143 | (4) |
|
|
|
7 The ACC'1990 Control Benchmark: A Two-Mass-Spring System |
|
|
147 | (12) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
7.2 Benchmark Setup: ACC Control Problem |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (5) |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
|
156 | (3) |
|
8 The ABB'2008 Control Benchmark: A Flexible Manipulator |
|
|
159 | (14) |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
8.2 Benchmark Setup: The ABB Control Problem |
|
|
159 | (4) |
|
|
163 | (5) |
|
|
168 | (3) |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
9 The 2012 IFAC Control Benchmark: An Industrial Boiler Process |
|
|
173 | (14) |
|
|
173 | (1) |
|
9.2 Benchmark Setup: Boiler Control Problem |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
|
176 | (4) |
|
|
180 | (2) |
|
|
182 | (5) |
|
|
182 | (5) |
|
|
|
10 Multiobjective Optimization Design Procedure for Controller Tuning of a Peltier Cell Process |
|
|
187 | (14) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
|
189 | (8) |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
|
198 | (3) |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
11 Multiobjective Optimization Design Procedure for Controller Tuning of a TRMS Process |
|
|
201 | (14) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
201 | (2) |
|
11.3 The MOOD Approach for Design Concepts Comparison |
|
|
203 | (5) |
|
11.4 The MOOD Approach for Controller Tuning |
|
|
208 | (5) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
12 Multiobjective Optimization Design Procedure for an Aircraft's Flight Control System |
|
|
215 | (12) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
|
216 | (3) |
|
|
219 | (3) |
|
12.4 Controllers Performance in a Real Flight Mission |
|
|
222 | (5) |
|
|
227 | (1) |
References |
|
227 | |