Preface |
|
iii | |
|
|
vii | |
|
|
ix | |
Summary |
|
xi | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xvii | |
Abbreviations |
|
xix | |
|
Chapter One Deregulating School Aid in California |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Brief History of Categorical Funding |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
District Response Patterns |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Contextual Factors Salient to Decisionmaking |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Organization of This Report |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
|
9 | (4) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
Chapter Three Opinions, Sources of Information, and Knowledge About Tier 3 Flexibility |
|
|
13 | (8) |
|
Sources of Information About Tier 3 Flexibility |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
Opinions About the Adoption of Tier 3 Flexibility |
|
|
14 | (3) |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
Resources for Low-Achieving Students |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
District Understanding of the Rules Governing Tier 3 Flexibility |
|
|
17 | (4) |
|
Chapter Four How Were Tier 3 Program Funds Used and Accounted For? |
|
|
21 | (6) |
|
Tier 3 Programs Experiencing the Largest Reductions |
|
|
21 | (4) |
|
Types of Districts Most Likely to Reallocate Tier 3 Program Funds |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
Accounting Procedures Related to Tier 3 Revenues and Expenditures |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
Chapter Five How Districts Made Budget Decisions---Goals, Local Constituencies, and Outside Advice |
|
|
27 | (6) |
|
Goals That Influenced Decisions About Flexibility |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
Types of Constituents Participating in Decisions About Tier 3 Flexibility |
|
|
29 | (4) |
|
Chapter Six Consequences of Tier 3 Flexibility for Districts |
|
|
33 | (6) |
|
Reported Effects on Services, Programs, and Staffing |
|
|
33 | (3) |
|
Reported Effects on Teaching and Instructional Improvement |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
Reported Effects on District Relations with Labor and Community Groups |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
Chapter Seven District Leaders' Future Plans |
|
|
39 | (6) |
|
Likely Actions for 2011--12 |
|
|
39 | (3) |
|
District Priorities for 2011--12 |
|
|
42 | (3) |
|
Chapter Eight Conclusions and Policy Implications |
|
|
45 | (6) |
|
How Well Did Districts Understand the Regulations and the Purposes of the Legislation? |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
Who Did Districts Turn to for Information and Advice? |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
What Was Done with Tier 3 Categorical Funds? |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
What Priorities Did District Leaders Emphasize? |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Who Influenced Decisions About Tier 3 Programs? |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
What Were the Consequences for Students, Staff, and Other Stakeholders? |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
What Do Districts Expect to Happen in 2011--12? |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Lessons Learned from Tier 3 Flexibility |
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
|
|
A List of Advisory Group Members |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
B List of Tier 3 Categorical Programs (2009--2010) |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
C Procedures for Sampling, Data Collection, and Analysis |
|
|
55 | (4) |
|
D Median Values on Selected District Characteristics |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
E Comparing CFO Responses Based on District Characteristics |
|
|
61 | (24) |
|
F School Characteristics Associated with District Responses to Tier 3 Flexibility |
|
|
85 | (8) |
|
|
93 | (8) |
References |
|
101 | |