Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Deregulating School Aid in California: How Districts Responded to Flexibility in Tier 3 Categorical Funds in 2010-2011 [Minkštas viršelis]

  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 122 pages, aukštis x plotis: 280x216 mm
  • Išleidimo metai: 08-Aug-2012
  • Leidėjas: RAND
  • ISBN-10: 0833076426
  • ISBN-13: 9780833076427
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 122 pages, aukštis x plotis: 280x216 mm
  • Išleidimo metai: 08-Aug-2012
  • Leidėjas: RAND
  • ISBN-10: 0833076426
  • ISBN-13: 9780833076427
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
A large share of California¹s school funding is allocated through programs whose funding is contingent on districts using the money in a particular way. In 2008­09, the strings were taken off 40 of these programs as part of a budget deal that also reduced their funding. This report presents the results of a survey of California¹s district chief financial officers (CFOs), describing how they made decisions in light of this new state policy.
Preface iii
Figures
vii
Tables
ix
Summary xi
Acknowledgments xvii
Abbreviations xix
Chapter One Deregulating School Aid in California
1(8)
Introduction
1(1)
Brief History of Categorical Funding
2(1)
Tier 3 Flexibility
3(1)
Previous Findings
3(3)
District Response Patterns
4(1)
Contextual Factors Salient to Decisionmaking
5(1)
Related Research
6(1)
Research Questions
6(1)
Organization of This Report
7(2)
Chapter Two Methods
9(4)
Survey Design
9(1)
Survey Administration
10(1)
Limitations
11(2)
Chapter Three Opinions, Sources of Information, and Knowledge About Tier 3 Flexibility
13(8)
Sources of Information About Tier 3 Flexibility
13(1)
Opinions About the Adoption of Tier 3 Flexibility
14(3)
Legislative Intent
14(2)
Resources for Low-Achieving Students
16(1)
District Understanding of the Rules Governing Tier 3 Flexibility
17(4)
Chapter Four How Were Tier 3 Program Funds Used and Accounted For?
21(6)
Tier 3 Programs Experiencing the Largest Reductions
21(4)
Types of Districts Most Likely to Reallocate Tier 3 Program Funds
25(1)
Carryover Funds
25(1)
Accounting Procedures Related to Tier 3 Revenues and Expenditures
25(2)
Chapter Five How Districts Made Budget Decisions---Goals, Local Constituencies, and Outside Advice
27(6)
Goals That Influenced Decisions About Flexibility
27(2)
Types of Constituents Participating in Decisions About Tier 3 Flexibility
29(4)
Chapter Six Consequences of Tier 3 Flexibility for Districts
33(6)
Reported Effects on Services, Programs, and Staffing
33(3)
Reported Effects on Teaching and Instructional Improvement
36(1)
Reported Effects on District Relations with Labor and Community Groups
37(2)
Chapter Seven District Leaders' Future Plans
39(6)
Likely Actions for 2011--12
39(3)
District Priorities for 2011--12
42(3)
Chapter Eight Conclusions and Policy Implications
45(6)
How Well Did Districts Understand the Regulations and the Purposes of the Legislation?
45(1)
Who Did Districts Turn to for Information and Advice?
46(1)
What Was Done with Tier 3 Categorical Funds?
46(1)
What Priorities Did District Leaders Emphasize?
46(1)
Who Influenced Decisions About Tier 3 Programs?
47(1)
What Were the Consequences for Students, Staff, and Other Stakeholders?
47(1)
What Do Districts Expect to Happen in 2011--12?
48(1)
Lessons Learned from Tier 3 Flexibility
48(3)
APPENDIXES
A List of Advisory Group Members
51(2)
B List of Tier 3 Categorical Programs (2009--2010)
53(2)
C Procedures for Sampling, Data Collection, and Analysis
55(4)
D Median Values on Selected District Characteristics
59(2)
E Comparing CFO Responses Based on District Characteristics
61(24)
F School Characteristics Associated with District Responses to Tier 3 Flexibility
85(8)
G Online Survey
93(8)
References 101