1 Introduction |
|
1 | (20) |
|
Globalisation, Competitiveness and Design Excellence |
|
|
1 | (6) |
|
From Competitive Globalisation to Competitive Design |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
Sydney: Australia's Global City |
|
|
10 | (4) |
|
|
14 | (4) |
|
Organisation of This Book |
|
|
18 | (3) |
2 Property Development, Governance and Design Excellence |
|
21 | (26) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
Property Development and Design Governance |
|
|
22 | (3) |
|
Shaping Property Development Outcomes: The Struggle for Opportunity Space |
|
|
25 | (4) |
|
Tools for Public Sector Intervention in Design |
|
|
29 | (5) |
|
Design Competitions as Design Governance |
|
|
34 | (8) |
|
Design Governance and Its Challenges |
|
|
42 | (3) |
|
|
45 | (2) |
3 Global Sydney: Economy, Planning and Environment |
|
47 | (34) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (20) |
|
Sydney in the Global City System |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
|
51 | (4) |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
|
57 | (6) |
|
|
63 | (5) |
|
|
68 | (7) |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
|
71 | (4) |
|
The Physical Character of Central Sydney |
|
|
75 | (3) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
Measuring Advanced Producer Services (APS) in the Sydney CBD |
|
|
79 | (2) |
4 A Pre-history of Design Excellence in Sydney |
|
81 | (36) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (7) |
|
A more Enlightened Climate Valuing Design |
|
|
89 | (8) |
|
Evolving Planning and Design Standards in Sydney City |
|
|
97 | (9) |
|
Growing Practice of Design Competitions |
|
|
106 | (9) |
|
|
115 | (2) |
5 The City of Sydney's Competitive Design Policy: Context, Genesis and Operation |
|
117 | (42) |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
Design Excellence Post-2000 in Central Sydney |
|
|
118 | (10) |
|
|
128 | (7) |
|
Institutionalisation, Review and Revision |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
Sydney City's Competitive Design Policy |
|
|
137 | (10) |
|
Competition Processes in Action |
|
|
147 | (8) |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
|
156 | (3) |
6 Competitive Projects and Their Design Outcomes |
|
159 | (32) |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
Quantifying Competitive Outcomes and Processes in the Sydney CBD |
|
|
160 | (6) |
|
|
160 | (4) |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
|
166 | (5) |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
|
171 | (11) |
|
|
172 | (3) |
|
|
175 | (3) |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
Intermediate Rating Projects |
|
|
179 | (3) |
|
|
182 | (3) |
|
|
185 | (6) |
|
Undertaking the Statistical Overview |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
Developing the Appraisal Tool |
|
|
187 | (4) |
7 Competitions and Excellence: Three Case Studies |
|
191 | (48) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
|
192 | (11) |
|
Circular Quay: The Development and Design Context |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
Stage 1 Development Application |
|
|
194 | (4) |
|
Stage 2 Development Application |
|
|
198 | (3) |
|
|
201 | (2) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (14) |
|
|
204 | (2) |
|
Competitive Design Alternatives Process |
|
|
206 | (7) |
|
Detailed Development Application |
|
|
213 | (2) |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
50 Bridge Street/Quay Quarter |
|
|
217 | (19) |
|
|
218 | (4) |
|
Stage 1 Development Application |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
|
222 | (8) |
|
Stage 2 Development Application |
|
|
230 | (3) |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
|
234 | (2) |
|
|
236 | (3) |
8 The Benefits and Drawbacks of Mandatory Design Competitions |
|
239 | (30) |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (11) |
|
Competitions Elevate Design Quality by Producing Varied and Innovative Solutions |
|
|
240 | (3) |
|
Competitions Generate Variety in the Range of Firms Awarded Design Commissions |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
Competitions Elevate Quality by Placing Greater Emphasis on Design Considerations |
|
|
244 | (3) |
|
Competitions Increase Developer Certainty and Raise Awareness of the Design Dividend |
|
|
247 | (3) |
|
Competitions Advance the Architectural Profession |
|
|
250 | (1) |
|
|
251 | (15) |
|
Competitions Are Costly for Participants |
|
|
252 | (3) |
|
Competitions Limit the Dialogue Between Designers and Their Clients |
|
|
255 | (2) |
|
Competitions Are Not Public Events |
|
|
257 | (2) |
|
Competitions Are Costly to Run |
|
|
259 | (2) |
|
Management and Judging of Competitions Is Not Transparent |
|
|
261 | (3) |
|
Intellectual Property May Be Lost or Stolen as Part of a Competition |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
Competitions Are Mostly Won by International (St)architects |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
|
266 | (3) |
9 Design Competitions as Public Policy |
|
269 | (28) |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
Assessing the Sydney Model |
|
|
270 | (5) |
|
Flexibility in the Application of Planning Controls |
|
|
272 | (2) |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
Raising Awareness of the 'Design Dividend' |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
|
275 | (8) |
|
|
276 | (1) |
|
|
277 | (2) |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
Documentation of Requirements and Protocols |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
The Social Dimension of Design Excellence |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
Mandatory Design Competitions and the Struggle for Opportunity Space |
|
|
283 | (3) |
|
Distributed Decision-Making |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
Balancing Prescription with Flexibility |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
Design Competitions as a Tool for Design Governance |
|
|
286 | (4) |
|
Design Quality and Competition Type |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
Design Quality and Mature Competition Management |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
Design Quality and Development Type |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
The Value-Add of a Competition |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
The Appropriateness of a Competition |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
Competition Contagion: The Metropolitan and State Context |
|
|
290 | (6) |
|
|
296 | (1) |
10 Conclusion |
|
297 | (16) |
|
Competitions and Exceptionalism |
|
|
299 | (5) |
|
Competitions and Competitiveness |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
Competitions and Design Excellence |
|
|
305 | (2) |
|
Competitions and the Public Interest |
|
|
307 | (6) |
Bibliography |
|
313 | (28) |
Index |
|
341 | |