Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Developing an Army Strategy for Building Partner Capacity for Stability Operations [Minkštas viršelis]

  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 264 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 232x155x16 mm, weight: 431 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 16-Jun-2010
  • Leidėjas: RAND
  • ISBN-10: 0833049542
  • ISBN-13: 9780833049544
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 264 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 232x155x16 mm, weight: 431 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 16-Jun-2010
  • Leidėjas: RAND
  • ISBN-10: 0833049542
  • ISBN-13: 9780833049544
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
The U.S. government is facing the dual challenge of building its own interagency capacity for conducting stability operations while simultaneously building partner capacity (BPC) for stability operations. This study finds that although BPC and stability operations are receiving a good deal of attention in official strategy and planning documents, insufficient attention is being paid to the details of an integrated strategy.
Preface iii
Figures
ix
Tables
xi
Summary xiii
Acknowledgments xxv
List of Abbreviations
xxvii
Chapter One Introduction
1(20)
Understanding Building Partner Capacity and Stability Operations
4(5)
Building Partner Capacity
4(2)
Stability Operations
6(3)
Analytical Approach: Strategic Elements of Building Partner Capacity for Stability Operations
9(5)
Goals
10(1)
Roles and Missions
11(1)
Capabilities
12(1)
Programs and Activities
13(1)
Partners
13(1)
Analyses Useful for Building Partner Capacity Planning
14(4)
Baseline Activities Analysis
15(2)
Detailed Activities Assessment
17(1)
Partner-Selection Modeling and Analysis
18(1)
Organization of the Report
18(3)
Chapter Two BPC for Stability Operations: Roles, Missions, and Capabilities
21(32)
BPC Roles
22(3)
Department of State
22(1)
U.S. Agency for International Development
23(1)
Department of Defense
24(1)
Stability Operations Roles and Missions
25(7)
Department of State
26(1)
U.S. Agency for International Development
27(1)
Department of Defense
28(4)
The Intersection of BPC and Stability Operations Guidance for the U.S. Army
32(2)
Army Field Manuals 3-0 and 3-07
33(1)
Army Security Cooperation Strategy
33(1)
Relevant U.S. Army Capabilities for Stability Operations
34(16)
Establish and Maintain a Safe and Secure Environment
36(3)
Establish Representative, Effective Governance and the Rule of Law
39(4)
Deliver Humanitarian Assistance
43(2)
Reconstruct Critical Infrastructure and Restore Essential Services
45(2)
Support Economic Development
47(2)
Conduct Strategic Communications
49(1)
Conclusion
50(3)
Chapter Three BPC for Stability Operations Programs and Activities
53(20)
U.S. Government Programs and Activities
55(5)
U.S. Army Programs
57(1)
Other Department of Defense Programs
58(1)
Other U.S. Government Programs
58(2)
Programs and Activities in the SOUTHCOM Region
60(3)
U.S. SOUTHCOM Events
60(1)
Coding Methodology
61(1)
Summary of SOUTHCOM TSCMIS Analysis
62(1)
Allies' BPC for Stability Operations Activities
63(8)
Australia
64(1)
Canada
64(1)
France
65(1)
Germany
66(1)
Turkey
67(1)
United Kingdom
68(1)
Summary
69(2)
Conclusion
71(2)
Chapter Four Assessing BPC for Stability Operations Programs and Activities
73(22)
Illustrating the Assessment Approach
74(7)
Step 1 Select Desired End State and Specific Goals
74(2)
Step 2 Develop Generic Input, Output, and Outcome Indicators and Extenal Factors
76(1)
Step 3 Identify Focus Countries, Programs, Program Aims, and Appropriate Goals
76(2)
Step 4 Identify Appropriate Indicators and External Factors
78(2)
Step 5 Apply Assessment Framework to Select Cases
80(1)
Step 6 Determine Overall Progam/Activity Contributions to Achieve the Desired End State
80(1)
Applying the Assessment Framework: BPC for Stability Operations Case Studies
81(12)
Civil-Military Emergency Preparedness Program
81(3)
DoD Regional Centers Stability Operations Courses and Conferences
84(4)
Africa Contigency Operations Training Assistance Program
88(5)
Conclusion
93(2)
Chapter Five Analyzing Potential Partners
95(30)
Country Sample
96(1)
Coalition/Regional Model
97(14)
Capability Attribute
100(1)
Willingness Attribute
100(3)
Apropriateness Attribute
103(2)
Regional Analysis
105(2)
Coalition Analysis
107(1)
Analysis of Willingness-Appropriateness Attributes
107(2)
Analysis of Willingness-Capability Attributes
109(1)
Shifting the Weighting of Willingness Indicators
109(2)
Analysis of Countries with High Capability
111(1)
Regional Analysis
111(3)
U.S. Central Command
112(1)
U.S. Africa Command
112(1)
U.S. Southern Command
113(1)
Indigenous Model
114(7)
Fragility
116(1)
Democratization
116(1)
United Nations Votes
117(1)
U.S. Strategic Interests
117(4)
Indigenous Exploratory Analysis
121(2)
Fragility and Receptivity
121(1)
Most Fragile States
122(1)
Strategic Interests
122(1)
Conclusion
123(2)
Chapter Six Recommendations
125(6)
BPC and Stability Operations Guidance
126(1)
Baseline Activities Analysis
126(1)
Detailed Activities Assessment
127(1)
Analysis of Potential Partners
128(1)
Additional Research
129(2)
APPENDIX
A Defining Capabilities for Stability Operations
131(30)
B List of BPC for Stability Operations Prorgrams and Activities
161(22)
C Generic Indicators for Case Studies
183(4)
D Case Studies
187(26)
E Partner-Selection Models
213(16)
Bibliography 229