SUMMARY |
|
1 | (19) |
I HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE AND BACKGROUND |
|
19 | (24) |
|
Introduction and Background |
|
|
21 | (8) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (6) |
|
Organization of the Report |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Current Uses of Dietary Reference Standards |
|
|
29 | (14) |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
Uses of the Former RDAs and RNIs |
|
|
31 | (11) |
|
Looking Ahead: Applying the DRIs |
|
|
42 | (1) |
II APPLICATION OF DRIS FOR INDIVIDUAL DIET ASSESSMENT |
|
43 | (28) |
|
Using Dietary Reference Intakes for Nutrient Assessment of Individuals |
|
|
45 | (26) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Proposed New Method for Individual Assessment |
|
|
46 | (20) |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
|
69 | (2) |
III APPLICATION OF DRIS FOR GROUP DIET ASSESSMENT |
|
71 | (74) |
|
Using the Estimated Average Requirement for Nutrient Assessment of Groups |
|
|
73 | (33) |
|
|
73 | (3) |
|
|
76 | (5) |
|
|
81 | (12) |
|
Adjusting Intake Distributions |
|
|
93 | (9) |
|
Inappropriate Approaches for Group-Level Assessment Using the RDA |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
Units of Observation Other Than the Individual |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
Using the Adequate Intake for Nutrient Assessment of Groups |
|
|
106 | (7) |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
Comparison of the AI, RDA, and EAR |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Limitations of the AI in Dietary Assessment |
|
|
109 | (3) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
Using the Tolerable Upper Intake Level for Nutrient Assessment of Groups |
|
|
113 | (14) |
|
|
113 | (7) |
|
Evaluating the Risk of Adverse Effects Using the UL |
|
|
120 | (5) |
|
Some Frequently Asked Questions |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
Specific Applications: Assessing Nutrient Intakes of Groups Using the Dietary Reference Intakes |
|
|
127 | (18) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
Describing Dietary Survey Data |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
Assessing the Prevalence of Inadequate or Excessive Intake |
|
|
129 | (3) |
|
Evaluating Differences in Intake |
|
|
132 | (9) |
|
|
141 | (4) |
IV FINE-TUNING DIETARY ASSESSMENT USING THE DRIS |
|
145 | (122) |
|
Minimizing Potential Errors in Assessing Group and Individual Intakes |
|
|
147 | (15) |
|
Tailoring Requirements for Specific Groups and Individuals |
|
|
147 | (3) |
|
Minimizing Errors in Measuring Dietary Intakes |
|
|
150 | (8) |
|
Issues of Variance in Dietary Assessment |
|
|
158 | (3) |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
Research Recommended to Improve the Uses of Dietary Reference Intakes |
|
|
162 | (6) |
|
Research to Improve Estimates of Nutrient Requirements |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
Research to Improve the Quality of Dietary Intake Data |
|
|
163 | (2) |
|
Research to Improve Statistical Methods for Using the DRIs to Assess Intakes of Individuals |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Research to Improve Statistical Methods for Using the DRIs to Assess Intakes of Groups |
|
|
165 | (3) |
|
|
168 | (99) |
APPENDIXES |
|
|
A Origin and Framework of the Development of Dietary Reference Intakes |
|
|
179 | (6) |
|
B Nutrient Assessment of Individuals: Statistical Foundations |
|
|
185 | (18) |
|
C Assessing Prevalence of Inadequate Intakes for Groups: Statistical Foundations |
|
|
203 | (8) |
|
D Assessing the Performance of the EAR Cut-Point Method for Estimating Prevalence |
|
|
211 | (21) |
|
E Units of Observation: Assessing Nutrient Adequacy Using Household and Population Data |
|
|
232 | (22) |
|
F Rationale for Setting Adequate Intakes |
|
|
239 | (15) |
|
G Glossary and Abbreviations |
|
|
254 | (8) |
|
H Biographical Sketches of Subcommittee Members |
|
|
262 | (5) |
INDEX |
|
267 | (15) |
SUMMARY TABLES: Dietary Reference Intakes |
|
|
Estimated Average Requirements |
|
|
282 | (2) |
|
Tolerable Upper Intake Levels |
|
|
284 | (3) |
|
Recommended Intakes for Individuals |
|
|
287 | |