Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Digital Constitutionalism in Europe: Reframing Rights and Powers in the Algorithmic Society [Kietas viršelis]

3.00/5 (2 ratings by Goodreads)
(University of Oxford)
  • Formatas: Hardback, 304 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 235x157x23 mm, weight: 700 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Serija: Cambridge Studies in European Law and Policy
  • Išleidimo metai: 26-May-2022
  • Leidėjas: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1316512770
  • ISBN-13: 9781316512777
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Digital Constitutionalism in Europe: Reframing Rights and Powers in the Algorithmic SocietyDidesnis paveikslėlis
  • Formatas: Hardback, 304 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 235x157x23 mm, weight: 700 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Serija: Cambridge Studies in European Law and Policy
  • Išleidimo metai: 26-May-2022
  • Leidėjas: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1316512770
  • ISBN-13: 9781316512777
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Pastovi nuoroda: https://www.kriso.lt/db/9781316512777.html
Raktažodžiai:
This book provides the first study on digital constitutionalism in Europe. The research explains the European constitutional reaction to the challenges of digital capitalism while exploring a normative perspective to protect fundamental rights and democracy in the algorithmic society based on the path of European digital constitutionalism.

This book is about rights and powers in the digital age. It is an attempt to reframe the role of constitutional democracies in the algorithmic society. By focusing on the European constitutional framework as a lodestar, this book examines the rise and consolidation of digital constitutionalism as a reaction to digital capitalism. The primary goal is to examine how European digital constitutionalism can protect fundamental rights and democratic values against the charm of digital liberalism and the challenges raised by platform powers. Firstly, this book investigates the reasons leading to the development of digital constitutionalism in Europe. Secondly, it provides a normative framework analysing to what extent European constitutionalism provides an architecture to protect rights and limit the exercise of unaccountable powers in the algorithmic society. This title is also available as open access on Cambridge Core.

Recenzijos

' an enriching read for any lawyer interested in legal challenges arising from information technologies.' Common Market Law Review

Daugiau informacijos

How to protect rights and limit powers in the algorithmic society? This book searches for answers in European digital constitutionalism.
Foreword xiii
Oreste Pollicino
Acknowledgements xv
1 Digital Constitutionalism: An Introduction 1(37)
1.1 Reframing Constitutionalism in the Digital Age
1(5)
1.2 Paths of Constitutionalisation
6(5)
1.3 Governing the Algorithmic Society
11(9)
1.4 The Forgotten Talent of European Constitutionalism
20(5)
1.5 Investigating European Digital Constitutionalism
25(9)
1.6 Research Structure
34(4)
2 The Rise of European Digital Constitutionalism 38(42)
2.1 Moving towards European Digital Constitutionalism
38(3)
2.2 The Charm of Digital Liberalism
41(12)
2.2.1 Immunising Online Intermediaries
44(4)
2.2.2 Ensuring the Free Circulation of Personal Data
48(5)
2.3 Judicial Activism As a Bridge
53(11)
2.3.1 The Constitutional Dimension of Online Intermediaries
56(4)
2.3.2 The Judicial Path towards Digital Privacy
60(4)
2.4 The Reaction of European Digital Constitutionalism
64(14)
2.4.1 Democratising Content Moderation
67(7)
2.4.2 Centring a Personal Data Risk-Based Approach
74(4)
2.5 Freedoms and Powers in the Algorithmic Society
78(2)
3 The Law of the Platforms 80(43)
3.1 From Public to Private As from Atoms to Bits
80(3)
3.2 The Governance Shift
83(12)
3.2.1 The First Constitutional Asymmetry
89(3)
3.2.2 The Second Constitutional Asymmetry
92(3)
3.3 Delegated Exercise of Quasi-Public Powers Online
95(15)
3.3.1 Delegating Powers on Content
102(3)
3.3.2 Delegating Powers on Data
105(5)
3.4 Autonomous Exercise of Quasi-Public Powers Online
110(10)
3.4.1 A New Status Subjectionis or Digital Social Contract
112(4)
3.4.2 The Exercise of Autonomous Powers
116(4)
3.5 Converging Powers in the Algorithmic Society
120(3)
4 From Parallel Tracks to Overlapping Layers 123(34)
4.1 The Intimate Connection between Content and Data
123(2)
4.2 An Evolving Relationship on Different Constitutional Grounds
125(6)
4.3 The Blurring Lines between Content and Data
131(12)
4.3.1 Active Providers and Data Controllers
135(3)
4.3.2 From the Takedown of Content to the Delist of Data
138(5)
4.4 From Legal Divergence to Convergence
143(12)
4.4.1 Constitutional Conflict and Converging Values
145(3)
4.4.2 From Content to Process
148(2)
4.4.3 Content and Data Liability
150(5)
4.5 The Challenges Ahead in the Field of Content and Data
155(2)
5 Digital Constitutionalism and Freedom of Expression 157(59)
5.1 Expressions in the Algorithmic Society
157(3)
5.2 From the Free Marketplace of Ideas ...
160(6)
5.3 ... To the Algorithmic Marketplace of Ideas
166(21)
5.3.1 The Public Sphere in the Age of Algorithms
169(7)
5.3.2 The Logic of Moderation
176(8)
5.3.3 Private Enforcement of Freedom of Expression
184(3)
5.4 The First Reaction of European Digital Constitutionalism
187(5)
5.5 Horizontal Effect Filling Regulatory Gaps
192(9)
5.6 Rethinking Media Pluralism in the Age of Online Platforms
201(13)
5.6.1 The Positive Side of Freedom of Expression
203(4)
5.6.2 The Passive Side of Freedom of Expression
207(4)
5.6.3 The Digital Services Act
211(3)
5.7 Expressions and Personal Data
214(2)
6 Digital Constitutionalism, Privacy and Data Protection 216(57)
6.1 Data in the Algorithmic Society
216(3)
6.2 From the Right to Be Let Alone
219(6)
6.3 ...To Privacy and Data Protection in the Age of Big Data
225(4)
6.4 The Constitutional Challenges of Big Data
229(24)
6.4.1 The Blurring Boundaries of Personal Data
234(6)
6.4.2 Clashing General Principles
240(6)
6.4.3 The Freedom from Algorithmic Processing
246(7)
6.5 The Constitutional Reframing of the GDPR
253(18)
6.5.1 Recentring Human Dignity
255(7)
6.5.2 Conflicting Positions and Proportionality
262(5)
6.5.3 Enhancing Due Process
267(4)
6.6 Constitutional Values in the Algorithmic Society
271(2)
7 The Road Ahead of European Digital Constitutionalism 273(45)
7.1 The Consolidation of European Digital Constitutionalism
273(4)
7.2 Values: Digital Humanism versus Digital Capitalism
277(9)
7.3 Governance: Public Authority versus Private Ordering
286(10)
7.4 Scope: Constitutional Imperialism versus Constitutional Protectionism
296(15)
7.5 Conclusions: The Constitutional Lesson Learnt and the Digital Road Ahead
311(7)
Bibliography 318(37)
Index 355
Giovanni De Gregorio is Postdoctoral Researcher working with the Programme in Comparative Media Law and Policy at the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford. His research interest deals with digital constitutionalism, platform governance and digital policy.