Acknowledgments |
|
xiii | |
Abbreviations |
|
xv | |
|
|
xvii | |
|
|
xxi | |
|
1 The Regulation of ICTS for the Pursuit of Citizenship Rights |
|
|
1 | (39) |
|
I Introduction and Overview |
|
|
1 | (5) |
|
II A Framework of Principles for Regulating ICTs |
|
|
6 | (32) |
|
A Regulatory Framework That Protects the Citizenship Rights of Persons with Disabilities |
|
|
7 | (8) |
|
A Regulatory Framework Reliant on Active Regulatory Intervention to Eliminate Accessibility Barriers |
|
|
15 | (4) |
|
A Regulatory Framework Focused on Tackling Social Barriers |
|
|
19 | (4) |
|
A Regulatory Framework That Prioritizes the Interests of Citizens over Industry Interests |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
A Regulatory Framework That Promotes Universal Design |
|
|
26 | (10) |
|
A Regulatory Framework That Involves Persons with Disabilities and Their Representative Organizations in Policy Making |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
|
40 | (46) |
|
I The Protection of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the Regulation of ICTs in Canada |
|
|
40 | (31) |
|
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms |
|
|
40 | (6) |
|
The Canadian Human Rights Act |
|
|
46 | (5) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
The Telecommunications Act |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
|
55 | (16) |
|
II Call for Increased Protection for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the Regulation of ICTs |
|
|
71 | (12) |
|
|
83 | (3) |
|
3 Case Study: The European Union |
|
|
86 | (42) |
|
I The Protection of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the Regulation of ICTs in the European Union |
|
|
87 | (29) |
|
|
87 | (10) |
|
The Audiovisual Media Services (AVMS) Directive |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
The Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications |
|
|
99 | (14) |
|
Soft-Law Instruments on E-Accessibility |
|
|
113 | (3) |
|
II Call for Increased Protection for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the Regulation of ICTs |
|
|
116 | (10) |
|
|
126 | (2) |
|
4 Case Study: The United Kingdom |
|
|
128 | (40) |
|
I The Protection of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the Regulation of ICTs in the United Kingdom |
|
|
128 | (30) |
|
|
128 | (14) |
|
|
142 | (16) |
|
II Call for Increased Protection for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the Regulation of ICTs |
|
|
158 | (7) |
|
|
165 | (3) |
|
5 Case Study: The United States of America |
|
|
168 | (40) |
|
I The Protection of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the Regulation of ICTs in the United States of America |
|
|
168 | (29) |
|
The Americans with Disabilities Act |
|
|
168 | (11) |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
|
180 | (17) |
|
II Call for Increased Protection for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the Regulation of ICTs |
|
|
197 | (9) |
|
|
206 | (2) |
|
6 Lessons to Be Learned? Reflection on the Case Studies |
|
|
208 | (55) |
|
I Addressing Common Challenges in the Regulation of ICTs |
|
|
209 | (45) |
|
An Increased Protection for the Citizenship Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the ICT Sector |
|
|
211 | (6) |
|
Approaching Accessibility through a Human Rights Lens |
|
|
217 | (7) |
|
A Move away from the Medical Definition of Disability in Favor of the Social Definition |
|
|
224 | (6) |
|
A Move away from the Hierarchy of Disabilities in Favor of a Rights-Based Approach |
|
|
230 | (4) |
|
An Increased Reliance on Active Regulatory Intervention to Eliminate Accessibility Barriers |
|
|
234 | (6) |
|
A Move away from Retrofit Measures in Favor of Universal Design for ICT Products and Services |
|
|
240 | (3) |
|
An Increased Level of Involvement by Persons with Disabilities and Their Representative Organizations in Policy Making |
|
|
243 | (7) |
|
An Increased Level of International Cooperation for Eliminating Accessibility Barriers |
|
|
250 | (4) |
|
II Conclusions - Quo Vadis? |
|
|
254 | (9) |
Bibliography |
|
263 | (20) |
Index |
|
283 | |