|
|
xv | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xvii | |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
Some early views of childhood |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
The beginnings of childhood |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
|
3 | (4) |
|
The maternal deprivation hypothesis |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Imprinting, bonding and attachment |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Bowlby's theory of attachment |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
|
9 | (16) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (6) |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Ethical and methodological issues |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (3) |
|
|
25 | (14) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (5) |
|
Konrad Lorenz and greylag geese |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
Critical period hypothesis |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Consequences of imprinting |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
Bonding in non-human animals |
|
|
31 | (3) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of non-human research |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
Ethical and practical concerns |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
What bonding research means for attachment |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
|
39 | (16) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
The development of attachment behaviour |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
Indiscriminate attachments |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
Understanding why these changes take place |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
Individual differences in attachment |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (4) |
|
What the Strange Situation measures |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
The value of a secure attachment |
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
Short-term effects: benefits of secure attachment |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Long-term effects: emotional development and relationships |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Long-term effects: parenting |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
Long-term effects: personality development |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
Long-term effects: self-esteem |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
Long-term effects: cognitive development |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
Monotropy versus multiple attachments |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
The case for multiple attachments |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
|
55 | (16) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Children reared in isolation |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
The Koluchova twins (PM and JM) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (6) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
Evaluation of Tizard's study |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
Reactive attachment disorder |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
Privation or deprivation? |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
Individual differences in coping |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
|
71 | (14) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
Criticisms of the PDD model |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (4) |
|
Hospitals and later maladjustment |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (4) |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
Day care with a childminder |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Attachment to day-care provider |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
Final evaluation of separation experiences |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (2) |
|
Social and cultural variations |
|
|
85 | (12) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
What is `cultural variation'? |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Cultural variations in attachment |
|
|
86 | (5) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
The Strange Situation as an imposed etic |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
Are there any differences? |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Cultural variations in childrearing |
|
|
91 | (3) |
|
Studies of Western childrearing styles |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
Social class (sub-cultural) differences |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
|
94 | (3) |
|
|
97 | (14) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
What is a theory of attachment? |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
Attachment theory before Bowlby |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of Freudian and behaviourist approaches |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (5) |
|
The influence of psychoanalysis: maternal deprivation |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
The influence of ethology: attachment theory |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
A critical or sensitive period |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
The internal working model |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
Caregiver sensitivity hypothesis |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Evaluation of Bowlby's theory |
|
|
105 | (3) |
|
Rutter's commentary: maternal deprivation reassessed |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Other criticisms of Bowlby's theory |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
108 | (3) |
|
|
111 | (12) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
112 | (2) |
|
The effect of institutionalisation |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
Other studies of visual deprivation |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Criticisms of verbal deprivation theory |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Development of intelligence |
|
|
116 | (4) |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Preschool enrichment programmes |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
Intelligence enrichment programmes: conclusions |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
Social and emotional development |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
|
123 | (18) |
|
|
124 | (9) |
|
|
133 | (8) |
|
Bowlby (1946) Forty-four juvenile thieves |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
Schaffer and Emerson (1964) The development of social attachments in infancy |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
Fox (1977) Attachment of kibbutz infants to mother and metapelet |
|
|
137 | (4) |
Glossary |
|
141 | (8) |
References |
|
149 | (18) |
Index |
|
167 | |