Preface |
|
xii | |
Acknowledgements |
|
xviii | |
|
1 Edwin H. Sutherland's life and career as a sociologist and criminologist |
|
|
1 | (26) |
|
Preface: on Edwin H. Sutherland as an improbable candidate for the status of key criminologist |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
The context of Sutherland's remarkable career |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
The life and times of Edwin H. Sutherland |
|
|
3 | (12) |
|
Formative years (1883--1910): provincial Midwestern origins |
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
The United States during Sutherland's formative years: 1890--1910 |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
Middle years (1910--1935): University of Chicago and a peripatetic academic career |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
The United States during Sutherland's middle years: 1910--1935 |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Later and final years (1935-1950): Indiana University and growing professional prominence |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
The United States during Sutherland's later and final years: 1935--1950 |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
The discipline of sociology in America early in the twentieth century |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
The criminological context of Sutherland's time |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
Sutherland and the field of criminology: 1930--1950 |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
Edwin H. Sutherland as a sociologist and as a criminologist |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
In sum: the life, times and career of Sutherland |
|
|
23 | (4) |
|
2 Sutherland on the field of criminology and criminological theory |
|
|
27 | (29) |
|
Criminology (Principles of Criminology): a seminal textbook |
|
|
28 | (6) |
|
The first edition of Sutherland's criminology textbook |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
Sutherland's criminology textbook and competing criminology textbooks |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
Criminology textbooks today---and the future of criminology textbooks |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
The theory of differential association |
|
|
34 | (9) |
|
The criminological context within which the theory emerged |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
The development of the theory of differential association |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
Core dimensions of the theory of differential association |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
Critiques of and modifications to the theory of differential association |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
The theory of differential association and white-collar crime |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
The theory of differential association, in sum |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
Sutherland and the Michael-Adler report: criminology as a "young science" |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
The Sutherland/Gluecks debate: on explaining crime |
|
|
46 | (5) |
|
The Sutherland/Gluecks debate, in sum |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
In sum: Sutherland on criminology and criminological theory |
|
|
51 | (5) |
|
3 Sutherland on crime, on types of crime, and on the criminal law |
|
|
56 | (31) |
|
|
56 | (6) |
|
The concept of white-collar crime |
|
|
62 | (14) |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
The nature of white-collar crime |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
Explaining white-collar crime |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
The social control of white-collar crime |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
The significance of the concept of white-collar crime |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
The Sutherland/Tappan debate on defining crime |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
Sutherland on white-collar crime, in sum |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
Sutherland on the sexual psychopath laws |
|
|
76 | (5) |
|
Sutherland on crime, on types of crime, and on the criminal law: in sum |
|
|
81 | (6) |
|
4 Sutherland among others: his contemporaries and competitors |
|
|
87 | (28) |
|
On key thinkers and iconic figures |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
Sutherland and the case of Willem Bonger |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
Sutherland and sociological iconoclasts |
|
|
92 | (6) |
|
Thorstein Veblen and Sutherland |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
C. Wright Mills and Sutherland |
|
|
95 | (3) |
|
Sheldon and Eleanor Glueck and Sutherland |
|
|
98 | (5) |
|
Sheldon Glueck and war criminals |
|
|
100 | (3) |
|
Robert K. Merton and Sutherland |
|
|
103 | (4) |
|
Sutherland and the capitalist political economy |
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
Sutherland among others, in sum |
|
|
109 | (6) |
|
5 Sutherland's followers and critics |
|
|
115 | (29) |
|
Two students of Sutherland: Marshall Clinard and Donald R.Cressey |
|
|
115 | (5) |
|
Marshall Clinard and Sutherland |
|
|
115 | (3) |
|
Donald R. Cressey and Sutherland |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
Four later twentieth century criminologists inspired by Sutherland |
|
|
120 | (9) |
|
Gilbert Geis and Sutherland |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
William J. Chambliss and Sutherland |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
Richard Quinney and Sutherland |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
Ronald L. Akers and Sutherland |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
|
129 | (8) |
|
C. Ray Jeffery and Sutherland |
|
|
129 | (3) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
Travis Hirschi and Michael Gottfredson |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
Robert Sampson and John Laub |
|
|
135 | (2) |
|
Sutherland's critics, in sum |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
Sutherland's followers and critics, in sum |
|
|
137 | (7) |
|
6 Criminology in the wake of Sutherland and his enduring legacy |
|
|
144 | (31) |
|
The empirical evidence of Sutherland's enduring influence |
|
|
144 | (4) |
|
Criminology since 1950: extending and transcending Sutherland's legacy |
|
|
148 | (6) |
|
Encountering Sutherland: a sample of living criminologists |
|
|
154 | (13) |
|
The first encounters with Sutherland |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
The reach of Sutherland's influence |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
How `white-collar crime' influenced personal trajectories |
|
|
158 | (5) |
|
How differential association and engagement with theory influenced personal trajectories |
|
|
163 | (3) |
|
Sutherland's relevance for a twenty-first century criminology |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
Concluding thoughts on our survey |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
The legacy of Edwin H. Sutherland: concluding thoughts |
|
|
167 | (8) |
|
A post-script: the Sutherland legacy and the Trump era |
|
|
169 | (6) |
Index |
|
175 | |