Woodworth (war and society, U. of New Brunswick and St. Thomas U., Canada) suggests that there is much to learn about women novelists' ideas concerning their own liberty by looking at how they write male characters. She shows how a number of writers during the period employed their creative powers to liberate men from the very institutions and ideas about power, society, and gender that promoted the subjection of women. The writing juxtaposes the private emotional world of courtship, marriage, and family with the public demands on men, she says, in such a manner as to draw attention to the overlapping political structures of the two worlds. Annotation ©2012 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)
In the late eighteenth-century English novel, the question of feminism has usually been explored with respect to how women writers treat their heroines and how they engage with contemporary political debates, particularly those relating to the French Revolution. Megan Woodworth argues that women writers' ideas about their own liberty are also present in their treatment of male characters. In positing a 'Gentleman's Liberation Movement,' she suggests that Frances Burney, Charlotte Smith, Jane West, Maria Edgeworth, and Jane Austen all used their creative powers to liberate men from the very institutions and ideas about power, society, and gender that promote the subjection of women. Their writing juxtaposes the role of women in the private spheres with men's engagement in political structures and successive wars for independence (the American Revolution, the French Revolution, and the Napoleonic Wars). The failures associated with fighting these wars and the ideological debates surrounding them made plain, at least to these women writers, that in denying the universality of these natural freedoms, their liberating effects would be severely compromised. Thus, to win the same rights for which men fought, women writers sought to remake men as individuals freed from the tyranny of their patriarchal inheritance.