The book is clearly written, thoroughly referenced, historically grounded, and thought provoking. Jecker's text will be welcomed by anyone with an interest in bioethics or aging who is willing to question the dominance customarily given to autonomy across the life-span. Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates. Graduate students, faculty, and professionals. General readers. * M. D. Lagerwey, Western Michigan University * Jecker...provides an in-depth, scholarly analysis of Western bioethics values considered across the life-span, but the emphasis is on old age. Jecker's main argument is that values other than autonomy should be given more weight in stages other than midlife, and that failure to do so harms individuals and societies...The author builds her arguments logically, anticipating objections and systematically addressing them with ethical humility. The book is clearly written, thoroughly referenced, historically grounded, and thought provoking. Jecker's text will be welcomed by anyone with an interest in bioethics or aging who is willing to question the dominance customarily given to autonomy across the life-span... Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates. Graduate students, faculty, and professionals. General readers. * CHOICE * The first 50 years of American bioethics focused attention on autonomy in relation to suffering, medical technology, and the end of life. Yet the long last stage of life * the decades from midlife through old ageis replete withĀmoral questions that transcend the framework of health care decision-making and are not limited to life's end. Societies such as the United States now face fresh ethical challenges presented by population aging. This major philosophical work by Nancy Jecker is a welcome addition to the task of bringing old age into view and articulating a conceptual and practical bioethics for our aging societies.Nancy Berlinger, The Hastings Center * Ending Midlife Bias is a unique, precisely argued, and compelling book which challenges the notion that the values of midlife are the measure of a good life. Readers have much to learn from Jecker's original conception of justice between generations and the moral principles that support it. A superb piece of scholarship with practical implications for everyday life. * Thomas R. Cole, McGovern Chair in Medical Humanities, The University of Texas at Houston * A comprehensive, highly readable examination of how different stages of life require different ethical analysis. Jecker's defense of often controversial claims is intriguing. * Paul T. Menzel, Pacific Lutheran University (emeritus) * Ending Midlife Bias is ambitious. It seeks to reshape basic assumptions in how we approach bioethics. I think it is a valuable read at two levels. On an individual level, it's food for thought. Readers are left to contemplate their biases and re-assess how they think about life itself including their own roles in an ongoing story. At a scholarly level, it confronts institutions and ethics councils with deeply ingrained biases that, if her critique is correct, corrupt even the most basic principles of bioethics...But Jecker may convince them that the fact that our values change over time has massive ethical significance. And that power makes Ending Midlife Bias a read worthy of our attention. * Caitlin Maples, The Journal of Value Inquiry *