Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Enforcement of European Union Environmental Law: Legal Issues and Challenges 2nd edition [Minkštas viršelis]

  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 786 pages, aukštis x plotis: 234x156 mm, weight: 453 g, 10 Tables, black and white; 1 Line drawings, black and white
  • Išleidimo metai: 11-Jan-2017
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 1138701882
  • ISBN-13: 9781138701885
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 786 pages, aukštis x plotis: 234x156 mm, weight: 453 g, 10 Tables, black and white; 1 Line drawings, black and white
  • Išleidimo metai: 11-Jan-2017
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 1138701882
  • ISBN-13: 9781138701885
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Offering a detailed account of the various legal arrangements at European Union level, this book is an ideal reference tool for practitioners and legal scholars. As well as examining the principal sources of EU environmental law enforcement, it also contributes to the legal and political debates that surround the subject.

Spanning three parts, the author examines the practical impact of the legal arrangements at Union level that are used to uphold EU environmental norms. Offering a comprehensive account of the current state of EU environmental law enforcement and the developments affecting it, Martin Hedemann-Robinson explores the role of the European Commission, the possibilities for private law enforcement, and the responsibilities of member state national authorities.

Key legal developments that have occurred since the first edition have been incorporated, including new statutory developments and case law. Particular attention is paid to the impact of the 2007 Lisbon Treaty on foundational EU treaty provisions enabling the European Commission to take legal action against EU member states infringing Union environmental law, the establishment of a new legal architecture at Union level on the topic of environmental criminal policy, as well as increased EU legislative intervention in the area of environmental inspections. The impact of the 1998 Århus Convention on EU environmental law enforcement is also addressed in detail, including the influence of recommendations of the Århus Conventions Compliance Committee.
Preface xv
Table of cases xvii
Table of treaties and environmental legislation xxxii
Table of abbreviations lx
1 Introduction
1(29)
1.1 Legal architecture and terminology of the EU: a brief overview
8(5)
1.1.1 Overview of the Union's constitutional development
9(4)
1.2 The EU's institutional framework
13(4)
1.3 EU environmental policy and law
17(13)
1.3.1 Legal basis for the adoption of EU environmental measures
18(3)
1.3.2 Types of EU environmental legislative measures
21(9)
Part I The role of the European Commission in enforcing EU environmental law
2 EU institutional enforcement of EU environmental law: the general legal framework
30(29)
2.1 The role of the European Commission as primary law enforcer
32(3)
2.2 Types of breaches of EU environmental law
35(5)
2.2.1 Von-transposition cases
35(2)
2.2.2 Bad-application' cases
37(3)
2.3 Enforcement proceedings brought by the European Commission: Articles 258 and 260(2) TFEU
40(10)
2.3.1 Structure and format of Article 258 TFEU proceedings
41(7)
2.3.2 Structure and format of Article 260(2) TFEU second-round proceedings
48(2)
2.4 Enforcement proceedings brought by a Member State: Article 259 TFEU
50(4)
2.5 The European Atomic Energy Community Treaty and infringement proceedings
54(5)
3 Enforcement action brought by the European Commission (1): Article 258 TFEU and 'first-round' infringement proceedings
59(88)
3.1 Detection of breaches of law
60(1)
3.2 Overview of core elements of Commission infringement proceedings
61(10)
3.2.1 General remarks regarding first-round proceedings under Article 258 TFEU
61(3)
3.2.2 General remarks regarding second-round proceedings under Article 260(2) TFEU
64(1)
3.2.3 Tables highlighting procedure and typical length of Article 258 TFEU infringement actions
65(6)
3.3 The pre-litigation phase in Article 258 TFEU infringement proceedings
71(32)
3.3.1 Evidence and onus of proof
72(4)
3.3.2 Investigations and the role of Article 4(3) TEU: AO of co-operation
76(2)
3.3.3 European Commission discretion in deciding to take legal action
78(11)
3.3.4 Letter of Formal Notice (LFN): the first written warning
89(5)
3.3.5 Reasoned Opinion (RO): the second written warning
94(9)
3.4 The litigation phase: application to the CJEU
103(5)
3.4.1 Contents of the Court application
103(4)
3.4.2 Temporal aspects of the litigation phase
107(1)
3.5 Common defence submissions in environmental infringement proceedings
108(14)
3.5.1 Internal problems facing an EU member state
111(1)
3.5.2 The element of fault on the part of the defendant member state
112(1)
3.5.3 Breach by another member state
112(1)
3.5.4 De minimis-type arguments
113(1)
3.5.5 Adequacy of implementation of EU environmental law
114(6)
3.5.6 Temporal arguments
120(2)
3.6 Interim relief and Article 258 TFEU proceedings
122(25)
3.6.1 Legal and institutional framework for securing interim measures
123(4)
3.6.2 Interim measures and environmental casework
127(20)
4 Enforcement action brought by the European Commission (2): Article 260 TFEU and 'second-round' infringement proceedings
147(49)
4.1 Introduction
147(7)
4.1.1 Duration of second-round infringement procedure
149(5)
4.2 General legal framework of the second-round infringement action (Article 260 TFEU)
154(11)
4.2.1 Article 260(1) TFEU
157(4)
4.2.2 Article 260(2) TFEU
161(4)
4.3 Financial penalties under Article 260(2) TFEU
165(20)
4.3.1 European Commission policy on financial penalties under Article 260(2) TFEU
166(8)
4.3.2 The CIEU-'s principles relating to financial sanctions under Article 260(2) TFEU
174(11)
4.4 Some concluding remarks on the second-round infringement procedure
185(11)
4A Environmental cases and Article 260(2) TFEU (on website)
4A.1 Second-round cases involving bad application of EU environmental law
4A.1.1 Kouroupitos (2) (Case C-387/97)
4A.1.2 Spanish Bathing Waters (2) (Case C-278/01)
4A.1.3 French Fishing Controls (2) (Case C-304/02)
4A.1.4 Belgian and Luxembourg Waste Water Treatment cases (Cases C-533/11 and C-576/11)
4A.2 Second-round cases involving nonconformity with EU environmental law
4A.2.1 French GMO Controls (2) (Case-121/07)
4A.2.2 Irish Waste Water (2) (Case C-374/11)
4A.2.3 Irish EIA (2) (Case C-279/11)
5 Enforcement action brought by the European Commission (3): some critical reflections
196(65)
5.1 Investigation and detection of infringements
198(7)
5.1.1 Investigatory and inspection tools
198(5)
5.1.2 Resources issues
203(1)
5.1.3 Complainants as sources of information on environmental law enforcement
204(1)
5.2 Limitations of legal structures underpinning Articles 258 and 260 TFEU
205(15)
5.2.1 Temporal aspects
206(8)
5.2.2 Legal sanctions
214(6)
5.3 The European Commission and conflicts of interest
220(7)
5.3.1 College of Commissioners
222(1)
5.3.2 The level of Directorate General
223(4)
5.4 Prioritisation of cases and reform of the monitoring process
227(12)
5.4.1 Commission responses to the issue of casework prioritisation
230(9)
5.5 Accountability and infringement proceedings
239(5)
5.6 Statistical information on EU environmental infringement cases
244(7)
5.6.1 European Commission annual reports on monitoring the application of EU law
244(1)
5.6.2 European Commission annual surveys and other annual publications on the implementation and enforcement of EU environmental law
245(1)
5.6.3 Statistical tables on EU environmental complaints and infringement cases
246(5)
5.7 Some brief concluding remarks
251(10)
Part II The role of private persons in enforcing EU environmental law
Section 1 Taking action at national level
6 Enforcement of EU environmental law at national level by private persons: general legal principles
261(69)
6.1 Direct effect and EU environmental law
265(46)
6.1.1 General introduction
265(6)
6.1.2 Criteria for direct effect and EU environmental directives
271(13)
6.1.3 Applying direct effect of directives against public authorities
284(12)
6.1.4 Reliance upon directives against private persons
296(15)
6.2 Indirect effect and EU environmental law
311(5)
6.2.1 General points
311(2)
6.2.2 Indirect effect and liability under criminal or administrative law
313(3)
6.3 Concluding remarks
316(14)
7 Access to justice at national level for breaches of EU environmental law (1): the role of the Court of Justice of the EU
330(36)
7.1 General principle of procedural autonomy under EU law
331(2)
7.2 Remedies at national level: general principles developed by the GJEU
333(7)
7.2.1 Duties on national courts to provide remedies
333(4)
7.2.2 Duties of non-judicial national authorities to provide adequate remedies
337(3)
7.3 State for breaches of EU environmental law
340(20)
7.3.1 General legal criteria for proving state under EU law
340(8)
7.3.2 State liability and EU environmental law
348(12)
7.4 Some concluding remarks
360(6)
8 Access to justice at national level for breaches of EU environmental law (2): EU legislation on access to legal review at national level
366(58)
8.1 The 1998 Arhus Convention and its impact on the EU legal order
370(12)
8.1.1 Overview of Arhus
370(5)
8.1.2 Legal impact of Arhus for the European Union
375(7)
8.2 EU legislative implementation of the Arhus Convention's obligations on access to environmental justice
382(16)
8.2.1 Access to justice regarding the first pillar of Arhus (environmental information)
383(1)
8.2.2 Access to justice regarding the second pillar of Arhus (public participation in environmental decision-making)
384(7)
8.2.3 Access to justice regarding the third pillar: environmental law enforcement
391(7)
8.3 Possibilities for a general EU directive on access to justice in environmental matters at national level
398(15)
8.3.1 The Seventh EU Environmental Action Programme (EAP7) and access to environmental justice at national level
399(1)
8.3.2 The 2003 Draft Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (AJEM) Directive
400(13)
8.4 Some concluding remarks
413(11)
8A Right of access to environmental information at national level: a complement to access to justice (on website)
8A.1 Directive 2003/4 on public access to environmental information (AEI Directive)
8A.1.1 Right of access to environmental information under the AEI Directive
8A.1.2 Public dissemination of environmental information under the AEI Directive
8A.1.3 Impact of the AEI Directive on EU environmental law enforcement
Section 2 Taking action at EU level
9 Private enforcement of EU environmental law at EU institutional level (1): access to justice
424(57)
9.1 Access to environmental justice under the EU treaty system
427(32)
9.1.1 Article 263 TFEU - annulment proceedings
429(17)
9.1.2 Article 267 TFEU - the preliminary ruling procedure
446(4)
9.1.3 Article 265 TFEU - legal proceedings in respect of a failure to act
450(3)
9.1.4 Articles 268 and 340(2) IFEU - non-contractual liability
453(6)
9.2 The Arhus. Regulation 1367/06 and access to environmental justice at EU level
459(10)
9.2.1 Material and personal scope of the Arhus Regulation's access to justice provisions
460(5)
9.2.2 Review procedures under the Arhus Regulation's access-to- justice provisions
465(1)
9.2.3 EU case law on the Arhus Regulation's impact on judicial review
466(3)
9.3 Internal review under the Ship Recycling Regulation 1257/13
469(2)
9.4 Some brief reflections on the impact of the EU's access to environmental justice framework in relation to EU institutional conduct
471(10)
9A Private enforcement of EU environmental law at EU institutional level (1A): access to environmental information (on website)
9A.1 Origins of the EU's legal framework on access to environmental information
9A.2 EU legislative framework on access to environmental information
9A.2.1 Scope of EU legislation on access to environmental information
9A.2.2 Right of access to environmental information
9A.2.3 Exceptions to the right of access to information
9A.2.4 Appeal mechanisms: European Ombudsman and judicial review
9A.3 Access to information and European Commission infringement case files: EU case law and administrative practice
9A.3.1 EU case law on access to environmental infringement files
9A.3.2 Administrative practice of the Commission on access to its infringement case files
9A.4 Some reflections on the EU legal framework concerning access to environmental information
10 Private enforcement of EU environmental law at EU institutional level (2): administrative complaints procedures and other possibilities
481(56)
10.1 The European Ombudsman (EO)
482(26)
10.1.1 General remit and powers of the EO
485(16)
10.1.2 Environmental maladministration complaints
501(7)
10.2 The European Parliament (EP)
508(7)
10.2.1 Right of petition to the EP
509(3)
10.2.2 Parliamentary questions
512(1)
10.2.3 EP temporary committees of inquiry
513(1)
10.2.4 The EP and Article 258/260 TFEU infringement proceedings
514(1)
10.3 European Citizens' Initiative (ECI)
515(4)
10.3.1 Eligibility and procedure concerning the ECI
516(1)
10.3.2 Right2Water - the first ECI
517(2)
10.4 The European Environment Agency (EEA)
519(1)
10.5 The Council of the EU and individual member states
520(1)
10.6 Some concluding remarks
521(16)
Part III The role of member states in enforcing EU environmental law
11 Enforcement of EU environmental law by national authorities (1): general principles and environmental inspection responsibilities
537(56)
11.1 General implementation duties of national authorities under EU law
539(7)
11.1.1 Active legal responsibilities of national authorities under EU law
540(3)
11.1.2 Passive legal responsibilities of national authorities under EU law
543(2)
11.1.3 The principle of subsidiarity
545(1)
11.2 The IMPEL network
546(11)
11.2.1 Origins and initial development of IMPEL
547(2)
11.2.2 Overview of IMPEL's current organisational structure and activities
549(3)
11.2.3 Increasing influence of IMPEL on EU environmental policy
552(3)
11.2.4 Brief appraisal of IMPEL's impact
555(2)
11.3 Environmental inspections and EU controls
557(20)
11.3.1 The first phase: Recommendation 2001/331 on environmental inspections (RMCEI)
558(10)
11.3.2 Sectoral development of binding EU environmental inspection standards
568(8)
11.3.3 The impact of EAP7: a trajectory towards general streamlining on inspection standards
576(1)
11.4 Implementation, environmental inspections and the EU: some concluding remarks
577(16)
11.4.1 Implementation duties
578(1)
11.4.2 Environmental inspections
579(14)
12 Enforcement of EU environmental law by national authorities (2): environmental civil liability
593(49)
12.1 The Council of Europe's 1993 'Lugano' Convention
594(3)
12.2 Developments of EU environmental policy on environmental civil liability
597(3)
12.3 EU Directive 2004/35 on environmental liability (ELD)
600(21)
12.3.1 Scope of liability under the ELD
603(9)
12.3.2 Extent of liability: an operator's specific obligations
612(6)
12.3.3 Competent authorities: principal enforcers
618(3)
12.3.4 Cross-border liability scenarios
621(1)
12.4 Implementation of the ELD
621(6)
12.4.1 The supervisory role of the European Commission
622(3)
12.4.2 The CJEU
625(2)
12.5 Environmental civil liability and the EU: some concluding remarks
627(15)
13 Enforcement of EU environmental law by national authorities (3): environmental criminal liability
642(47)
13.1 1998 Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Environment through Criminal Law (PECL Convention)
644(6)
13.2 The origins of EU environmental criminal policy
650(21)
13.2.1 The initial phases of policy development: the battle over intergovernmental and supranational competence (1957-2007)
650(21)
13.3 EU environmental criminal law comes of age: Directive 2008/99
671(4)
13.4 The impact of the 2007 Lisbon Treaty on the future prospects for EU environmental criminal law
675(4)
13.5 Some brief reflections
679(10)
14 EU environmental law enforcement: reflections
689(12)
Bibliography 701(10)
Index 711
Martin Hedemann-Robinson is a Senior Lecturer in Law at Kent University, Canterbury, UK.