Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Fallacies in Medicine and Health: Critical Thinking, Argumentation and Communication

  • Formatas: EPUB+DRM
  • Išleidimo metai: 29-Feb-2020
  • Leidėjas: Springer Nature Switzerland AG
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9783030285135
  • Formatas: EPUB+DRM
  • Išleidimo metai: 29-Feb-2020
  • Leidėjas: Springer Nature Switzerland AG
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9783030285135

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

This textbook examines the ways in which arguments may be used and abused in medicine and health. The central claim is that a group of arguments known as the informal fallacies – including slippery slope arguments, fear appeal, and the argument from ignorance – undertake considerable work in medical and health contexts, and that they can in fact be rationally warranted ways of understanding complex topics, contrary to the views of many earlier philosophers and logicians. Modern medicine and healthcare require lay people to engage with increasingly complex decisions in areas such as immunization, lifestyle and dietary choices, and health screening. Many of the so-called fallacies of reasoning can also be viewed as cognitive heuristics or short-cuts which help individuals make decisions in these contexts. Using features such as learning objectives, case studies and end-of-unit questions, this textbook examines topical issues and debates in all areas of medicine and health, including antibiotic use and resistance, genetic engineering, euthanasia, addiction to prescription opioids, and the legalization of cannabis. It will be useful to students of critical thinking, reasoning, logic, argumentation, rhetoric, communication, health humanities, philosophy and linguistics.

1 Critical Thinking in Medicine and Health
1(28)
1.1 Introduction
2(2)
1.2 Why Think Critically about Medicine and Health?
4(3)
1.3 What Is an Informal Fallacy?
7(6)
1.4 The Logical Journey of the Informal Fallacies
13(16)
Chapter Summary
22(1)
Suggestions for Further Reading
23(1)
Questions
23(2)
Answers
25(1)
References
26(3)
2 Arguing from Ignorance
29(36)
2.1 Introduction
30(2)
2.2 Attitudes to Ignorance
32(8)
2.3 Logic and Ignorance
40(7)
2.4 Arguing from Ignorance in Medicine and Health
47(9)
2.5 Ignorance as a Cognitive Heuristic
56(9)
Chapter Summary
57(1)
Suggestions for Further Reading
58(1)
Questions
59(2)
Answers
61(2)
References
63(2)
3 Slippery Slope Arguments
65(38)
3.1 Introduction
66(3)
3.2 Logical Features of Slippery Slope Argument
69(8)
3.3 Evaluating Slippery Slope Arguments
77(12)
3.4 Slippery Slope Reasoning as a Cognitive Heuristic
89(14)
Chapter Summary
92(1)
Suggestions for Further Reading
93(1)
Questions
94(3)
Answers
97(4)
References
101(2)
4 Fear Appeal Arguments
103(48)
4.1 Introduction
104(2)
4.2 Logical and Non-logical Uses of Fear
106(6)
4.3 Logical Features of Fear Appeal Argument
112(10)
4.4 Evaluating Fear Appeal Argument
122(11)
4.5 Fear Appeal in the Social Sciences
133(3)
4.6 Fear Appeal Argument as a Cognitive Heuristic
136(15)
Chapter Summary
139(1)
Suggestions for Further Reading
140(1)
Questions
140(4)
Answers
144(5)
References
149(2)
5 Appeals to Expertise
151(40)
5.1 Introduction
152(2)
5.2 Logical and Non-logical Uses of Expertise
154(7)
5.3 Logical Structure of Expert Appeals
161(4)
5.4 Logical Pitfalls in Arguing from Expertise
165(10)
5.5 Expert Appeal in the Social Sciences
175(4)
5.6 Expertise as a Cognitive Heuristic
179(12)
Chapter Summary
182(1)
Suggestions for Further Reading
183(1)
Questions
184(3)
Answers
187(3)
References
190(1)
6 Arguments from Analogy
191(40)
6.1 Introduction
192(2)
6.2 Preliminary Remarks
194(2)
6.3 Logical and Non-logical Uses of Analogy
196(3)
6.4 Logical Structure of Argument from Analogy
199(7)
6.5 Logical Pitfalls in Analogical Argument
206(8)
6.6 Experimental Studies of Analogical Reasoning
214(3)
6.7 Analogies as a Cognitive Heuristic
217(14)
Chapter Summary
219(1)
Suggestions for Further Reading
220(1)
Questions
221(5)
Answers
226(3)
References
229(2)
7 Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc
231(41)
7.1 Introduction
232(1)
7.2 Post Hoc in Medicine and Health
233(3)
7.3 Logical Features of the Fallacy of False Cause
236(3)
7.4 Rationally Warranted Post Hoc Reasoning
239(10)
7.5 Fallacious Post Hoc Reasoning
249(23)
Chapter Summary
259(1)
Suggestions for Further Reading
259(1)
Questions
260(5)
Answers
265(4)
References
269(3)
Supplementary Information
Glossary 272(7)
Bibliography 279(6)
Index 285
Louise Cummings is Professor in the Department of English at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong. She has published and edited 18 books in public health reasoning, communication disorders, pragmatics, and clinical linguistics. She is Visiting Professor at York St John University in the UK, and Honorary Research Associate at the University of Antwerp in Belgium.