|
List of figures and tables |
|
|
xi | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (3) |
|
1 Key features of the relationship between the firm and the territory |
|
|
4 | (31) |
|
1.1 The territory as a spatial system of relations |
|
|
4 | (14) |
|
1.1.1 Clusters: Characteristics and functions |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.1.1.1 Clusters vs. industrial districts |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
1.1.1.2 The notion of proximity |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
1.1.2 Ecosystems of firms |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
1.1.3 The territory: Specific concept, autonomous notion? |
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
1.2 The organizational dimension: Structural design, power configurations and organizational culture |
|
|
18 | (14) |
|
1.2.1 Introductory remarks |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
1.2.2 Insights into open systems and the environment in which firms operate |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
1.2.3 The environment, characteristics and organizational configuration: Power relations |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
1.2.3.1 Organizational configuration and the environment |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
1.2.3.2 The environment and the culture of the firm |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
1.2.4 The characterization of the territory as a specific environment |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
1.2.4.1 Territorial power (exerting influence and being influenced) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
1.2.4.2 Organizational configuration and the environment |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
1.2.4.3 Interactions between organizational and territorial culture |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
1.2.5.1 Case study no. 1: Business and territory: Filipino street food |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
1.2.5.2 Case study no. 2: The territory and organizational configurations: The case of the Italian Banche di Credito Cooperative |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
1.2.5.3 Case study no. 3: Leading territorial development: Territorial networks across Europe |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
1.3 Conclusions: An integrated framework derived from organizational theory |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
2 Positive implications of the relationship between the firm and the territory |
|
|
35 | (35) |
|
|
35 | (4) |
|
2.1.1 The relationship between the firm and the territory: The organizational framework |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
2.1.1.1 The contextual environment, the micro level and contingency theory |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
2.1.1.2 The contextual environment, the meso level and vital systems theory |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
2.1.1.3 The institutional environment and the micro level: The role of institutions |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
2.1.1.4 The institutional environment and the meso level: Isomorphism and the organizational field |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.2 Territorial identity and its institutional implications |
|
|
39 | (12) |
|
2.2.1 The firm as a territorial institution |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
2.2.2 Do territorial institutions influence organizational culture? |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
2.2.2.1 The culture of legality |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
2.2.2.2 The impact of territorial institutions on the culture of development |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
2.2.2.3 Territorial culture |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
2.2.3 Organizational field and territorial identity |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
2.2.4.1 Case study no. I: The impact of the firm on the territory. Ferrero: From Italy to India |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
2.2.4.2 Case study no. 2: The impact of the firm on the territory: The culture of the gaucho and the rural economy |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
2.2.4.3 Case study no. 3: Organizational field and safety culture |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
2.3 Territorial resilience: Bridging the gap between firms and system resilience |
|
|
51 | (8) |
|
2.3.1 Resilience as a complex but positive concept |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
2.3.2 The resilience of firms as organizational resilience |
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
2.3.3 Territorial resilience |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
2.3.4.1 Case study no. 1: Non-profit organizations, COVID-19 and resilience |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
2.3.4.2 Case study no. 2: Healthcare providers and COVID-19: The Italian experience: Hospitals, networks and territorial adaptability |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
2.4 Sustainability choices: The role of firms and territorial stakeholders |
|
|
59 | (11) |
|
2.4.1 The concept of sustainability: The links between development and the territory |
|
|
60 | (2) |
|
2.4.2 The sustainable choices of firms and the impact on the territory: The institutional perspective |
|
|
62 | (3) |
|
2.4.3 The role of multi-agents for territorial sustainability: The systemic approach |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
2.4.4.1 Case study no. 1: The case of the Palestinian women's cooperative |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
2.4.4.2 Case study no. 2: Sustainable territorial networks: The Tropical Forest Alliance |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
3 Negative implications of the relationship between the firm and the territory |
|
|
70 | (20) |
|
|
70 | (4) |
|
3.1.1 The territorial nature of offences committed by firms |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
3.1.1.1 The micro level: Transaction cost theory and the territorial dimension of criminal behaviour |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
3.1.1.2 The meso level: The neo-institutional theory of isomorphism |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
3.2 Why crimes committed by firms tend to be territorial |
|
|
74 | (5) |
|
3.3 Why some forms of criminal behaviour become widespread across territories |
|
|
79 | (7) |
|
|
86 | (4) |
|
3.4.1 Case study no. 1: The dynamics of territorial corruption |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
3.4.2 Case study no. 2: Isomorphism and illegal land use |
|
|
88 | (2) |
Conclusions |
|
90 | (2) |
References |
|
92 | (15) |
Acknowledgements |
|
107 | (1) |
Index |
|
108 | |