Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

First Amendment: [ Connected Ebook] 6th ed. [Kietas viršelis]

3.67/5 (24 ratings by Goodreads)
  • Formatas: Hardback, 768 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 254x187x33 mm, weight: 1429 g
  • Serija: Aspen Casebook
  • Išleidimo metai: 03-Feb-2020
  • Leidėjas: Aspen Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1543807801
  • ISBN-13: 9781543807806
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Hardback, 768 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 254x187x33 mm, weight: 1429 g
  • Serija: Aspen Casebook
  • Išleidimo metai: 03-Feb-2020
  • Leidėjas: Aspen Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1543807801
  • ISBN-13: 9781543807806
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
"Comprehensive First Amendment casebook geared toward top-tier law schools. Covers free speech, press, and religion. Book provides excellent balance of doctrinal, historical, and theoretical approaches to First Amendment jurisprudence. The book is among the most-used casebooks in the market in the subject area and is currently revised by a highly-distinguished authorship team"--
Preface xix
Acknowledgments xxi
Editorial Notice xxiii
The First Amendment xxv
The Constitution of the United States xxvii
Biographical Notes on Selected U.S. Supreme Court Justices xlv
First Amendment Timeline lxv
Part I Freedom of Expression
I The History and Philosophy of Free Expression
3(14)
Note: The History of Free Expression
3(6)
Note: The Philosophy of Free Expression
9(7)
Note: Organization
16(1)
II Content-Based Restrictions: Dangerous Ideas and Information
17(92)
A Speech that "Causes" Unlawful Conduct
17(55)
Shaffer v. United States
18(1)
Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten
19(3)
Schenck v. United States
22(2)
Note: Shaffer, Masses, and Schenck
24(3)
Frohwerk v. United States
27(1)
Debs v. United States
27(2)
Abrams v. United. States
29(3)
Note: Abrams and the Emergence of the Holmes/Brandeis Tradition
32(3)
Gitlow v. New York
35(3)
Note: "Abstract Doctrine" versus "Urging to Action"
38(2)
Whitney v. California
40(3)
Note: The Brandeis Concurrence and the Road to Dennis
43(3)
Dennis v. United States
46(5)
Note: Dennis and the Communist "Conspiracy"
51(4)
Note: The Road to Brandenburg
55(2)
Brandenburg v. Ohio
57(3)
Note: The Brandenburg Formulation
60(6)
Note: Abridgment of Speech Other Than by Direct Criminal Prohibition
66(6)
B Speech that Provokes a Hostile Audience Reaction
72(21)
Terminiello v. Chicago
72(1)
Cantwell v. Connecticut
73(1)
Feiner v. New York
74(3)
Note: The Search for Mechanisms of Control
77(5)
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
82(2)
Note: Fighting Words
84(4)
Note: The Skokie Controversy
88(2)
Snyder v. Phelps
90(3)
C Classified Information
93(16)
New York Times Co. v. United States; United States v. Washington Post Co.
93(7)
Note: The Pentagon Papers Controversy
100(7)
Note: Dangerous Ideas and Information-Final Thoughts
107(2)
III Overbreadth, Vagueness, and Prior Restraint
109(20)
A Overbreadth and Vagueness
109(7)
Gooding v. Wilson
109(3)
Note: Overbreadth
112(3)
Note: Vagueness
115(1)
B Prior Restraint
116(13)
Lovell v. Griffin
117(1)
Note: Licensing as Prior Restraint
118(4)
Near v. Minnesota
122(2)
Note: Injunction as Prior Restraint
124(5)
IV Content-Based Restrictions: "Low" Value Speech
129(156)
A False Statements of Fact
130(24)
New York Times v. Sullivan
131(6)
Note: "The Central Meaning" of New York Times v. Sullivan
137(3)
Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts; Associated Press v. Walker
140(1)
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
141(3)
Note: Public and Private Figures, Public and Private Speech
144(2)
Dun & Bradstreet v. Greenmoss Builders
146(1)
Note: Other False Statements of Fact
146(2)
United States v. Alvarez
148(4)
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
152(2)
B "Nonnewsworthy" Disclosures of "Private" Information
154(8)
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
154(3)
Note: Invasion of Privacy and the First Amendment
157(5)
C Threats
162(5)
Bridges v. California
162(1)
Watts v. United States
163(1)
Planned Parenthood v. American Coalition of Life Activists
164(3)
D Commercial Advertising
167(22)
Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council
168(7)
Note: Virginia Pharmacy and "the Free Flow of Commercial Information"
175(3)
Note: Truthful, Nondeceptive Commercial Advertising after Virginia Pharmacy
178(1)
Central Hudson Gas v. Public Service Commission of New York
179(1)
Note: Truthful, Nondeceptive Commercial Advertising
180(5)
Note: Other Regulations of Commercial Advertising
185(4)
E Obscenity
189(22)
Roth v. United States; Alberts v. California
190(2)
Note: Obscenity and Free Expression
192(5)
Note: Developments in the Law of "Obscenity"-1957-1973
197(3)
Miller v. California
200(3)
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton
203(1770)
Note: The
1973
Reformulation and Its Aftermath
207(4)
F Child Pornography, Animal Cruelty, and Violent Expression
211(15)
New York v. Ferber
211(2)
Ashcroft v. The Free Speech Coalition
213(4)
Note: Child Pornography
217(1)
United States v. Stevens
218(4)
Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
222(4)
G The Lewd, the Profane, and the Indecent
226(27)
Cohen v. California
227(4)
Note: Profanity, Cohen, and the Captive Audience
231(3)
Erznoznik v. Jacksonville
234(1)
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
235(2)
Note: Fleeting Expletives
237(2)
IANCU v. BRUNETTI
239(1)
Sable Communications, Inc. v. FCC
240(1)
Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
240(1)
Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union
241(3)
Note: "Indecent" Expression
244(4)
Note: Zoning Theaters with Adult Movies and Bars with Nude Dancing
248(5)
H Hate Speech
253(32)
Beauharnais v. Illinois
253(3)
Note: Group Defamation and "Hate Speech"
256(6)
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
262(5)
Wisconsin v. Mitchell
267(1)
Note: R.A.V. and Mitchell
268(2)
Virginia v. Black
270(9)
Note: R.A.V. and Black
279(1)
Note: Pornography and the Victimization of Women
279(3)
Note: "Low" Value Speech-Final Thoughts
282(3)
V Content-Neutral Restrictions: Limitations on the Means of Communication and the Problem of Content-Neutrality
285(196)
A General Principles
286(12)
Schneider v. State
286(1)
Martin v. City of Struthers
287(1)
Kovacs v. Cooper
288(1)
Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego
289(1)
City of Ladue v. Gilleo
290(1)
Bartnicki v. Vopper
291(1)
Note: The Search for Principles
292(2)
Note: The Meaning of "Content-Neutrality"
294(4)
B Speech on Public Property: The Public Forum
298(78)
1 The Public Forum: Streets and Parks
299(12)
Commonwealth v. Davis
299(1)
Hague v. CIO
300(1)
Schneider v. State
301(1)
Note: Regulating the Public Forum
302(6)
Note: Devices for Regulating the Public Forum
308(3)
2 The Public Forum: Other Publicly Owned Property
311(13)
Adderley v. Florida
311(2)
Note: "No Less Than a Private Owner of Property"?
313(5)
International Society for Krishna Consciousness v. Lee
318(3)
Note: Modern Public Forum Doctrine
321(1)
Note: The Right to a "Private" Forum
322(2)
3 The Public Forum: Unequal Access and the Problem of Content-Neutrali
324(28)
Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley
325(2)
Note: Mosley and the "Equality" of Ideas
327(3)
Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights
330(4)
Note: Lehman and the Limits of Mosley
334(3)
Perry Educators' Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association
337(1)
Note: Quintessential, Designated, and Nonpublic Forums
338(5)
Note: Religious Expression and the Meaning of "Viewpoint Neutrality"
343(4)
Christian Legal Society
Chapter v. Martinez
347(4)
Reed v. Town of Gilbert
351(1)
4 Unequal Access and the Problem of Government Speech
352(24)
Southeastern Promotions v. Conrad
353(2)
Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District v. Pico
355(2)
Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Washington
357(2)
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley
359(3)
Rust v. Sullivan
362(3)
Note: The Implications of Rust
365(2)
Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez
367(1)
Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International
368(3)
Note: The Reach of Government Speech: Summum, Walker, and Matal
371(5)
C Symbolic Conduct
376(26)
United States v. O'Brien
377(6)
Note: Draft Card Burning and the First Amendment
383(5)
Note: Flag Desecration and Misuse
388(6)
Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.
394(4)
City of Erie v. Pap's A.M.
398(1)
Note: Other Forms of Symbolic Speech
399(3)
D Other Means of Expression: Litigation, Association, and the Right Not to Speak
402(19)
NAACP v. Button
402(1)
Note: Litigation and the First Amendment
403(1)
NAACP v. Alabama
404(1)
Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees
405(2)
Note: Association and the First Amendment
407(1)
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale
408(3)
Note: The Meaning of Dale
411(1)
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins
412(1)
Note: Compelled Affirmation, Expression, and Association: The Right Not to Speak
413(8)
E Regulation of Political Solicitation, Contribution, Expenditure, and Activity
421(60)
Buckley v. Valeo
421(10)
Note: Buckle and the Problem of Abridging Speech to "Enhance" the Electoral Process
431(3)
Note: Subsidy and Disclosure
434(3)
Note: Campaign Finance Regulation in the Thirty Years After Buckley
437(4)
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
441(3)
Note: Campaign Finance and the Roberts Court
444(5)
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
449(11)
Note: Reflections on Citizens United
460(11)
Note: Additional Regulation of the Electoral Process
471(2)
Note: Regulating the Political Activities of Public Employees
473(4)
Note: Content-Neutral Restrictions-Final Thoughts
477(4)
VI Freedom of the Press
481(40)
A A "Preferred" Status for the Press?
481(2)
B A Right to "Gather" News?
483(13)
Branzburg v. Hayes
483(4)
Note: A Right to Gather News?
487(3)
Note: A Press Right of Access to Information?
490(2)
Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia
492(2)
Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court
494(1)
Note: Variations on the Press Right of Access
495(1)
C Differential Treatment of the Press
496(5)
Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue
497(1)
Note: Differential Treatment
498(3)
D Regulating the Press to "Improve" the Marketplace of Ideas
501(22)
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo
501(1)
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC
502(3)
Note: Regulating the Airwaves
505(2)
Turner Broadcasting System Inc. v. FCC
507(3)
Note: Turner and the Regulation of Cable
510(1)
Note: The First Amendment in Cyberspace
511(7)
Note: Free Expression-Final Thoughts
518(3)
Part II The Constitution and Religion 521(142)
VII Historical and Analytical Overview
523(22)
Everson v. Board of Education
523(3)
Note: The History of the Religion Clauses
526(7)
Note: General Approaches to the Religion Clauses
533(7)
Note: Defining Religion
540(5)
VIII The Establishment Clause
545(72)
A The Anticoercion Principle
546(13)
Lee v. Weisman
546(10)
Note: The Anticoercion Principle
556(3)
B The Nonendorsement Principle, History's Relevance, and de Facto Establishments
559(19)
Lynch v. Donnelly
563(1)
American Legion v. American Humanist Association
563(11)
Note: Abandoning the Lemon Test and Replacing It with What?
574(4)
C Impermissible Purposes
578(15)
Trump v. Hawaii
578(8)
Note: Problems with a Purpose Test
586(7)
D Facially Neutral Statutes that Incidentally Aid Religion: Permissible and Impermissible Effects
593(24)
Note: The Problem and Its Background
593(3)
Mueller v. Allen
596(4)
Note: From Aguilar to Mitchell
600(6)
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
606(3)
Note: Purpose and Effect in Aid to Nonpublic Education- Benevolent Neutrality?
609(6)
Note: Concluding Observations
615(2)
IX The Free Exercise Clause: Required Accommodations
617(24)
Note: From Reynolds to Smith
617(1)
Braunfeld v. Brown
618(1)
Sherbert v. Verner
619(1)
Wisconsin v. Yoder
620(2)
Note: Problems of Mandatory Accommodation
622(4)
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. Smith
626(8)
Note: Should Accommodation Be Required?
634(3)
Masterpiece Cakeshop Limited v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
637(2)
Note: The Implications of Masterpiece Cakeshop
639(2)
X Permissible Accommodation
641(22)
Corporation of Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Amos
642(5)
Texas Monthly v. Bullock
647(1)
Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet
648(3)
Note: When-If Ever-Should Accommodations of Religion Be Permitted?
651(4)
Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC
655(1)
Note: The Relation Between the Religion Clauses and Other Protections of Expression
656(5)
Note: Concluding Observations
661(2)
Table of Cases 663(6)
Table of Authorities 669(10)
Index 679