|
|
13 | (2) |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
|
17 | (6) |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
2 Literature review and theoretical framework |
|
|
23 | (28) |
|
|
23 | (23) |
|
2.1.1 Prior research on conditional constructions |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
2.1.1.1 Classical approaches to conditionals |
|
|
24 | (4) |
|
2.1.1.2 Research on conditionals from a functional-pragmatic perspective |
|
|
28 | (4) |
|
2.1.1.3 Research on conditionals from a contrastive perspective |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
2.1.1.4 Research on conditionals from a corpus-based perspective |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
2.1.2 Prior research on insubordination |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
2.1.2.1 Defining insubordination |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
2.1.2.2 The development of insubordination |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
2.1.2.3 A focus on insubordination in English, French and Spanish |
|
|
40 | (6) |
|
2.2 Theoretical framework |
|
|
46 | (5) |
|
3 Corpora and methodology |
|
|
51 | (18) |
|
3.1 Biber's (1988) multi-dimensional model of register analysis |
|
|
52 | (7) |
|
3.2 Corpora of parliamentary discourse |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
3.2.1 Description of the corpora |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
3.2.2 Process of data extraction |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
3.3 Corpora of conversations |
|
|
61 | (8) |
|
3.3.1 Description of the corpora |
|
|
61 | (5) |
|
3.3.2 Process of data extraction |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
|
69 | (76) |
|
4.1 Conditional subordination |
|
|
69 | (61) |
|
4.1.1 Case study I: parliamentary discourse |
|
|
69 | (4) |
|
4.1.1.1 Variables examined for the analysis of conditionals in parliament |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (7) |
|
4.1.1.3 Degree of likelihood |
|
|
80 | (5) |
|
|
85 | (4) |
|
4.1.1.5 Markedness of the apodosis |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
4.1.1.6 Modal in the apodosis |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
4.1.1.7 Summary and conclusions from parliamentary discourse |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
4.1.2 Case study II: conversations |
|
|
95 | (3) |
|
4.1.2.1 Variables examined for the analysis of conditionals in conversation |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (4) |
|
4.1.2.2.1 A focus on interpersonal conditionals |
|
|
102 | (9) |
|
4.1.2.3 Degree of likelihood |
|
|
111 | (4) |
|
|
115 | (5) |
|
4.1.2.5 Markedness of the apodosis |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
4.1.2.6 Modal in the apodosis |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
4.1.2.7 Summary and conclusions from conversation |
|
|
123 | (3) |
|
4.1.3 Interim discussion: Cross-register results |
|
|
126 | (4) |
|
|
130 | (15) |
|
4.2.1 Case study III: insubordination |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
4.2.1.1 Discourse functions |
|
|
131 | (5) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
4.2.1.1.5 Assertions/exclamations |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
4.2.1.2 Summary and conclusions from insubordination |
|
|
142 | (3) |
|
5 General discussion and conclusions |
|
|
145 | (18) |
|
5.1 Comparing the functional-pragmatic properties of conditionals and insubordinate if/si-clauses |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
5.2 if/si-constructions and pragmaticalization |
|
|
147 | (5) |
|
5.3 if/si-constructions and decategorialization |
|
|
152 | (2) |
|
5.4 Summary and concluding remarks |
|
|
154 | (9) |
|
6 Suggestions for further research |
|
|
163 | (4) |
References |
|
167 | (24) |
Appendix. Metadata and contextual information of the conversations analysed |
|
191 | (38) |
Index |
|
229 | |