Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: High Courts in Global Perspective: Evidence, Methodologies, and Findings

Edited by , Edited by , Edited by
  • Formatas: 362 pages
  • Serija: Constitutionalism and Democracy
  • Išleidimo metai: 27-Aug-2021
  • Leidėjas: University of Virginia Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780813946160
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: 362 pages
  • Serija: Constitutionalism and Democracy
  • Išleidimo metai: 27-Aug-2021
  • Leidėjas: University of Virginia Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780813946160
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

High courts around the world hold a revered place in the legal hierarchy. These courts are the presumed impartial final arbiters as individuals, institutions, and nations resolve their legal differences. But they also buttress and mitigate the influence of other political actors, protect minority rights, and set directions for policy. The comparative empirical analysis offered in this volume highlights important differences between constitutional courts but also clarifies the unity of procedure, process, and practice in the world’s highest judicial institutions.

High Courts in Global Perspective pulls back the curtain on the interlocutors of court systems internationally. This book creates a framework for a comparative analysis that weaves together a collective narrative on high court behavior and the scholarship needed for a deeper understanding of cross-national contexts. From the U.S. federal courts to the constitutional courts of Africa, from the high courts in Latin America to the Court of Justice of the European Union, high courts perform different functions in different societies, and the contributors take us through particularities of regulation and legislative review as well as considering the legitimacy of the court to serve as an honest broker in times of political transition. Unique in its focus and groundbreaking in its access, this comparative study will help scholars better understand the roles that constitutional courts and judges play in deciding some of the most divisive issues facing societies across the globe. From Africa to Europe to Australia and continents and nations in between, we get an insider’s look into the construction and workings of the world’s courts while also receiving an object lesson on best practices in comparative quantitative scholarship today.

Contributors:Aylin Aydin-Cakir, Yeditepe University, Turkey * Tanya Bagashka, University of Houston * Clifford Carrubba, Emory University * Amanda Driscoll, Florida State University * Joshua Fischman, University of Virginia * Joshua Fjelstul, Washington University in St. Louis * Tom Ginsburg, University of Chicago * Melinda Gann Hall, Michigan State University * Chris Hanretty, University of London * Lori Hausegger, Boise State University * Diana Kapiszewski, Georgetown University * Lewis A. Kornhauser, New York University * Dominique H. Lewis, Texas A&M University * Chien-Chih Lin, Academia Sinica, Taiwan * Sunita Parikh, Washington University in St. Louis * Russell Smyth, Monash University, Australia * Christopher Zorn, Pennsylvania State University

Constitutionalism and Democracy



Lewis, Texas A&M University * Chien-Chih Lin, Academia Sinica, Taiwan * Sunita Parikh, Washington University in St. Louis * Russell Smyth, Monash University, Australia * Christopher Zorn, Pennsylvania State UniversityConstitutionalism and Democracy

Recenzijos

By far the most comprehensive overview of the largest set of different judicial institutions I have seen anywhere. High Courts in Global Perspective offers insights on the largest and most diverse set of judicial institutions to date and will be a focal point for the emerging community of scholars both in law and in political science interested in comparative work about the judiciary. " Thomas Gschwend, University of Mannheim, coeditor of Research Design in Political Science: How to Practice What They Preach

Acknowledgments vii
Introduction 1(16)
Understanding Adjudication
17(27)
Lewis A. Kornhauser
The Us Supreme Court And Other Federal Courts
44(20)
Joshua Fischman
State Supreme Courts In The United States: The Comparative Advantage
64(24)
Melinda Gann Hall
Examining The Empirical Study Of The Supreme Court Of Canada
88(20)
Lori Hausegger
Empirical Studies Of Judicial Behavior And Decision-Making In Australian And New Zealand Courts
108(21)
Russell Smyth
Empirical Studies Of Judicial Behavior In The United Kingdom
129(22)
Chris Hanretty
Empirical Studies Of Judicial Behavior And Decision-Making On Indian Courts
151(13)
Sunita Parikh
European International Courts: The Cjeu And The Ecthr
164(22)
Clifford Carrubba
Joshua Fjelstul
Constitutional Courts In Europe: Quantitative Approaches
186(13)
Tanya Bagashka
Nuno Garoupa
Empirical Studies Of The Behavior Of Justices And High Courts In Latin America: An Overview
199(33)
Diana Kapiszewski
Lydia B. Tiedb
Judicial Behavior Research In East Asia
232(18)
Chien-Chih Lin
Tom Ginsburg
What Do We Know About The Middle Eastern Constitutional Courts?
250(17)
Aylin Aydin-Cakir
Empirical Studies Of African High Courts: An Overview
267(8)
Dominique H. Lewis
Comparative Studies Of Judicial Behavior
275(32)
Amanda Driscoll
Overcoming The Barriers To Comparative Judicial Behavior Research
307(24)
Rebecca Gill
Christopher Zorn
Notes on Contributors 331(4)
Index 335
Nuno Garoupa is Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Research and Faculty Development at George Mason University and coauthor of Judicial Reputation: A Comparative Theory.

Rebecca D. Gill is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, and coauthor of Judicialization of Politics: The Interplay of Institutional Structure, Legal Doctrine, and Politics on the High Court of Australia.

Lydia B. Tiede is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Houston.