"This packed paperback will bring you up to date and refortify the civic stamina that is required to save the planet for your posterity."
Ralph Nader, consumer advocate, lawyer, and author
Climate change and climate denial have remained largely off the radar in literacy and social studies education. This book addresses that gap with the design of the Climate Denial Inquiry Model (CDIM) and clear examples of how educators and students can confront two forms of climate denial: science denial and action denial. The CDIM highlights how critical literacies specifically designed for climate denial texts can be used alongside eco-civic practices of deliberation, reflexivity, and counter-narration to help students discern corporate, financial, and politically motivated roots of climate denial and to better understand efforts to misinform the American public, sow doubt and distrust of basic scientific knowledge, and erode support for evidence-based policymaking and collective civic action. With an emphasis on inquiry-based teaching and learning, the book also charts a path from destructive stories-we-live-by that are steeped in climate denial (humans are separate from nature, the primary goal of society is economic growth without limits, nature is a resource to be used and exploited) to ecojustice stories-To-live by that invite teachers and students to consider more just and sustainable futures.
Book Features:
- An innovative model to help educators address climate science denial and climate action denial.
- Clear examples of how to integrate critical literacies designed specifically for climate denial.
- Concrete climate- and inquiry-based teaching and learning pathways in literacy and social studies with much potential for connections across other content areas.
- A path from destructive stories steeped in climate denial to more just and sustainable futures.
Recenzijos
"This packed paperback will bring you up to date and refortify the civic stamina that is required to save the planet for your posterity."
Ralph Nader, consumer advocate, lawyer, and author
Preface |
|
xi | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xiii | |
Introduction |
|
1 | (9) |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
1 Climate Change, Denial, and Justice |
|
|
10 | (17) |
|
|
10 | (4) |
|
|
14 | (6) |
|
Climate Change Education in the United States |
|
|
20 | (4) |
|
Climate Denial, Inequality, and Justice |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
2 Climate Denial Inquiry Model |
|
|
27 | (18) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
Climate Denial Texts: Science Denial and Action Denial |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
|
33 | (3) |
|
Eco-Civic Practices: Deliberation, Reflexivity, and Counternarration |
|
|
36 | (4) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
|
40 | (4) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (18) |
|
Climate Change Denial Machine |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
Cultural-Historical Contexts |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
Sociopsychological Contexts |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (3) |
|
|
58 | (3) |
|
So What Best Explains the Range of Climate Beliefs in the United States? |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
4 Denial Texts and Critical Literacies+ |
|
|
63 | (18) |
|
Determining the Reliability of Sources |
|
|
63 | (4) |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
Climate Science Denial and FLICC |
|
|
69 | (5) |
|
Climate Action Denial: Delay Discourses and Frames |
|
|
74 | (6) |
|
Climate Denial Texts and Stories-We-Live-By |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
5 Eco-Civic Practices of Deliberation and Reflexivity |
|
|
81 | (17) |
|
"We Really Should Have Thought About This" |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
Motivated Reasoning and Reflexivity |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
Agonistic Encounters and Transformative Interrogation |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
Designing Agonistic Encounters with Climate Denial Texts |
|
|
86 | (10) |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
6 Confronting Denial Through Counternarration and Reliability Stories-To-Live-By |
|
|
98 | (11) |
|
Discerning Reliability: A Starting Point |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
Reliability Stories-We-Live-By |
|
|
100 | (3) |
|
|
103 | (3) |
|
A Trust for Public Information |
|
|
106 | (2) |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
7 A Deeper Dive Into Climate Denial: Classroom Inquiries |
|
|
109 | (13) |
|
Inquiry Pathways: Denial Contexts and Stories-We-Live-By |
|
|
110 | (11) |
|
|
121 | (1) |
|
8 Ecojustice Stories-To-Live-By |
|
|
122 | (8) |
|
Three Ecojustice Stories-To-Live-By |
|
|
123 | (5) |
|
From Social Organization of Denial to Collective Coordination for Ecojustice |
|
|
128 | (2) |
Appendix |
|
130 | (1) |
References |
|
131 | (22) |
Author Index |
|
153 | (4) |
Subject Index |
|
157 | (5) |
About the Authors |
|
162 | |
James S. Damico is a professor of literacy, culture, and language education at Indiana University, Bloomington and former elementary and middle school teacher from New Jersey.
Mark C. Baildon is an associate professor in foundations of education at the United Arab Emirates University and former middle and high school social studies teacher in schools around the world (United States, Israel, Singapore, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan).