Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Imperfect Primary: Oddities, Biases, and Strengths of U.S. Presidential Nomination Politics 2nd New edition [Kietas viršelis]

3.43/5 (14 ratings by Goodreads)
(University of Arizona, USA)
  • Formatas: Hardback, 186 pages, aukštis x plotis: 229x152 mm, weight: 408 g, 12 Line drawings, black and white; 6 Tables, black and white
  • Serija: Controversies in Electoral Democracy and Representation
  • Išleidimo metai: 27-Feb-2015
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 1138786373
  • ISBN-13: 9781138786370
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Hardback, 186 pages, aukštis x plotis: 229x152 mm, weight: 408 g, 12 Line drawings, black and white; 6 Tables, black and white
  • Serija: Controversies in Electoral Democracy and Representation
  • Išleidimo metai: 27-Feb-2015
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 1138786373
  • ISBN-13: 9781138786370
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
The complex and ever-changing rules governing American presidential nomination contests are continuously up for criticism, but there is little to no consensus on exactly what the problems are, or on how to fix them. The evolving system is hardly rational because it was never carefully planned. So how are we to make sense of the myriad complexities in the primary process, how it affects the general election, and calls for change?









In this thoroughly updated second edition of The Imperfect Primary, political scientist Barbara Norrander explores how presidential candidates are nominated, how that process bridges to the general election campaign, discusses past and current proposals for reform, and examines the possibility for more practical, incremental changes to the electoral rules. Norrander reminds us to be careful what we wish forreforming the presidential nomination process is as complex as the current system. Through the modelling of empirical research to demonstrate how questions of biases can be systematically addressed, students can better see the advantages, disadvantages, and potential for unintended consequences in a whole host of reform proposals.









The second edition includes an entirely new chapter on the connections between the primary and general election phases of presidential selection. The entire book has been revised to reflect the 2012 presidential primaries and election.

Recenzijos

Barbara Norrander's new edition of The Imperfect Primary confirms the book's status as the first place to look for anyone wanting to understand the complex and often arcane process used to nominate American presidential candidates. It provides a lucid, thorough, and concise account of the system's origins, current configuration, and strengths and weaknesses as a way of selecting national leaders. This new edition will serve as an authoritative guide for students and others who want to follow the action heading into the 2016 election.Gary Jacobson, University of California, San Diego



The author discusses the history of nominations, recent changes to the nomination process, the growing impact of party rules, primary timing, and the impact competitive primaries have on general elections; she concludes with an interesting overall analysis of what works and does not work within the current system. Norrander's work is timely, detailed, and particularly relevant as hotly contested primaries continue to fracture political parties in the US and raise questions about how Americans choose candidates to put up for national office. --W. Miller, Flagler College CHOICE

List of Figures and Tables ix
Preface x
1 Happenstance and Reforms 1(28)
Presidential Nominations in the 21st Century
5(2)
A Short History of Presidential Nominations
7(2)
Two Early Views: Nomination by Political Elites
9(2)
The Party Convention Eras
11(2)
The Origins of Presidential Primaries
13(2)
A Mixed System: Conventions and Primaries 1948-1968
15(2)
Moving to a Primary Dominated System
17(7)
The Primary Dominated Era: 1972 and Forward
24(5)
2 Presidential Nomination Politics at the Dawn of the 21st Century 29(40)
Recent Nomination Contests
30(11)
The Candidates 36, The (Not So) Invisible Primary
41(11)
The Two-Tiered Nomination Process
52(9)
Changing Technology, Changing Campaign Strategies
61(2)
Third-Party Nominations
63(1)
Nomination Controversies
64(5)
3 Is This a Fair Way to Select a Presidential Nominee? 69(37)
Who Votes in the Primaries?
70(4)
Who Should Vote in Primaries?
74(2)
Are Caucuses Fair?
76(3)
Concerns Over Convention Delegate Selection
79(6)
Superdelegates
85(2)
Winning Votes versus Winning Pledged Delegates
87(4)
Has Campaign Finance Become Less Fair?
91(4)
Is Media Coverage Biased?
95(1)
Do Debates and Straw Polls Play Too Big of a Role?
96(3)
A Hodgepodge of Rules and Procedures
99(7)
4 The Nomination Calendar: Problems and Imperfect Solutions 106(29)
The Accidental Calendar, Part 1: Iowa and New Hampshire Come First
107(2)
The Accidental Calendar, Part 2: The Perils of Front-loading
109(1)
Regional Primary Plans
110(4)
Grouping States by Population Size: The Delaware Plan
114(3)
One-Day National Primary
117(1)
Alternative Mechanisms for Counting the Votes in a National Primary
118(6)
Convention-Centered Plans
124(1)
Pathways to Reform
125(3)
Predicting the Consequences of Reform
128(1)
The Piecemeal Approach: Recent National Party Attempts to Control the Election Calendar
129(6)
5 Connections to the General Election 135(17)
Are Primaries Divisive?
136(1)
The "Spring Season" of the Fall Campaign
137(2)
The Advantages of an Unchallenged Incumbent President
139(2)
Primary Reform and Electoral College Reform
141(4)
Reform Proposals: Modifying the Electoral College
145(1)
Compounding Effects of a Switch to the National Popular Vote
146(6)
6 Oddities, Biases, and Strengths of U.S. Presidential Nomination Politics 152(11)
Oddities in U.S. Presidential Nomination Politics
153(1)
Biases in U.S. Presidential Nomination Politics
154(3)
Strengths of U.S. Presidential Nomination Politics
157(2)
Nominating Presidents in a System with Oddities, Biases, and Strengths
159(4)
Bibliography 163(16)
Index 179
Barbara Norrander is a professor in the School of Government and Public Policy at the University of Arizona. She has been writing about presidential nominations since the early 1980s.