Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Implications of Aggregated DOD Information Systems for Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation [Minkštas viršelis]

  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 80 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 236x154x5 mm, weight: 145 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 16-May-2010
  • Leidėjas: RAND
  • ISBN-10: 0833049488
  • ISBN-13: 9780833049483
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 80 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 236x154x5 mm, weight: 145 g
  • Išleidimo metai: 16-May-2010
  • Leidėjas: RAND
  • ISBN-10: 0833049488
  • ISBN-13: 9780833049483
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
The challenges associated with securing U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) information systems have grown as the department's information infrastructure has become more complex and interconnected. At the same time, the potential negative consequences associated with cyber intrusions have become more severe. Are current information assurance (IA) policies and procedures sufficient to address this growing threat, and are they able to address vulnerability issues associated with highly networked information systems? The current IA certification and accreditation (C&A) process focuses on individual, discrete systems or components of larger, aggregated information systems and networks that are colocated or operate on the same platform (such as a Navy ship). An examination of current policy shows that a new approach is needed to effectively extend the IA C&A process to aggregations of information systems and improve the security of DoD information systems. A number of recommendations are put forth to improve current IA policy and to enable the IA C&A of aggregations of DoD information systems that reside on a common platform.

The challenges associated with securing U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) information systems have grown as the department's information infrastructure has become more complex and interconnected. At the same time, the potential negative consequences associated with cyber intrusions have become more severe. Are current information assurance (IA) policies and procedures sufficient to address this growing threat, and are they able to address vulnerability issues associated with highly networked information systems? The current IA certification and accreditation (C&A) process focuses on individual, discrete systems or components of larger, aggregated information systems and networks that are colocated or operate on the same platform (such as a Navy ship). An examination of current policy shows that a new approach is needed to effectively extend the IA C&A process to aggregations of information systems and improve the security of DoD information systems. A number of recommendations are put forth to improve current IA policy and to enable the IA C&A of aggregations of DoD information systems that reside on a common platform.

The challenge of securing U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) information systems has grown significantly. A new approach to information assurance certification and accreditation (IA C&A) is needed to effectively extend the IA C&A process to aggregations of systems and improve their security. An examination of current policy shows that a number of changes could enable the IA C&A of aggregations of DoD information systems on a common platform.
Preface iii
Figures
vii
Tables
ix
Summary xi
Acknowledgments xvii
Abbreviations xix
Chapter One Background and Objective
1(6)
Background
1(3)
Objective
4(1)
Organization of This Monograph
5(2)
Chapter Two Growing Challenges for the Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation of DoD Information Systems
7(8)
Software Complexity
7(2)
Increasing Software Vulnerabilities and Malware Population
9(2)
Limitations of Automated Software Review Tools
11(1)
Challenge of Incremental Program Development
11(1)
Increasing Scrutiny of Programs
12(1)
System Interdependence and Interconnectedness
12(1)
Configuration Management and System Administration
13(2)
Chapter Three Overview of the Current DoD Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process
15(4)
DIACAP Activities and Scope
15(1)
Definition of a DoD Information System
16(1)
DIACAP Validation Activities and Results
17(2)
Chapter Four Aggregation Approach to DoD Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation
19(22)
Degrees of Aggregation
19(4)
Potential DIACAP Policy Issues
23(5)
Initiate and Plan Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation
23(1)
Implement and Validate Information Assurance Controls
24(3)
Decommission
27(1)
Potential DIACAP Implementation Difficulties for Aggregate Information Systems
28(8)
Initiate and Plan Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation
28(1)
Implement and Validate Information Assurance Controls
28(1)
Make Certification Determination and Accreditation Decisions
29(7)
Maintain Authorization to Operate and Conduct Reviews
36(1)
Balancing Transparency and Reporting Requirements
36(1)
Information System Information Assurance Pedigree
37(4)
Chapter Five Observations and Recommended Changes to DoD and Federal Policy
41(6)
Policy Recommendations
42(2)
Implementation Recommendations
44(1)
A Suggested Partial IA Aggregation Approach
45(2)
Appendixes
A DIACAP System Identification Profile
47(6)
B Definitions of MAC, CL, and MC
53(4)
References 57