Preface |
|
xvii | |
1 Introduction |
|
1 | (22) |
|
1.1 Randomized Response Models |
|
|
1 | (9) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.1.2 Other randomized response models |
|
|
2 | (5) |
|
1.1.3 Limitations of the randomized response models |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
1.2 Item Count Techniques |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
1.2.1 Basic idea for the item count techniques |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
1.2.2 Some applications and generalizations |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
1.2.3 Limitations of the item count techniques |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
1.3 Non-randomized Response Models |
|
|
13 | (5) |
|
1.3.1 Swensson's non-randomized response model |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
1.3.2 Takahasi and Sakasegawa's non-randomized response model |
|
|
14 | (3) |
|
1.3.3 Non-randomized response models from a viewpoint of incomplete categorical data design |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
1.4 Scope of the Rest of the Book |
|
|
18 | (5) |
2 The Crosswise Model |
|
23 | (20) |
|
|
23 | (4) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
2.1.3 Relative efficiency |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
2.1.4 Degree of privacy protection |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
2.2 A Non-randomized Warner Model: The Crosswise Model |
|
|
27 | (7) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Connection with the Warner model |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
2.2.3 Two asymptotic confidence intervals |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
2.2.4 Bootstrap confidence intervals |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
2.2.5 An asymptotic property of the modified MLE |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
2.3 Bayesian Methods for the Crosswise Model |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
2.3.3 Generation of i.i.d. posterior samples via the exact IBF sampling |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
2.4 Analyzing the Induced Abortion Data |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
2.5 An Experimental Survey Measuring Plagiarism |
|
|
37 | (6) |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
2.5.2 Analyzing the survey data for partial plagiarism |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
2.5.3 Analyzing the survey data for severe plagiarism |
|
|
41 | (2) |
3 The Triangular Model |
|
43 | (22) |
|
3.1 The Triangular Design |
|
|
43 | (4) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
3.1.2 Alternative formulation |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
3.1.3 Variance of the estimator |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3.1.4 Relative efficiency |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
3.1.5 Degree of privacy protection |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
3.2 Comparison with the Warner Model |
|
|
47 | (4) |
|
3.2.1 The difference of two variances |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
3.2.2 Relative efficiency of the Warner model to the triangular model |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Degree of privacy protection |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
3.3 Asymptotic Properties of the MLE |
|
|
51 | (3) |
|
3.3.1 An alternative derivation of the MLE |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Two asymptotic confidence intervals |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 Bootstrap confidence intervals |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
3.3.4 A modified MLE of π |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
3.4 Bayesian Methods for the Triangular Model |
|
|
54 | (2) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
3.4.3 Generation of i.i.d. posterior samples via the exact IBF sampling |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
3.5 Analyzing the Sexual Behavior Data |
|
|
56 | (3) |
|
3.6 Case Studies on Premarital Sexual Behavior |
|
|
59 | (6) |
|
3.6.1 Questionnaire at Hong Kong Baptist University |
|
|
59 | (3) |
|
3.6.2 Questionnaire at the Northeast Normal University |
|
|
62 | (3) |
4 Sample Sizes for the Crosswise and Triangular Models |
|
65 | (14) |
|
4.1 Precision and Power Analysis Methods |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
4.1.1 Type I error rate, Type II error rate and power |
|
|
65 | (2) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
4.2 The Triangular Model for One-sample Problem |
|
|
67 | (5) |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
4.2.3 Evaluation of the performance by comparing exact power with asymptotic power |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
4.2.4 Evaluation of the performance by calculating nT and nT/nD |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
3 The Crosswise Model for One-sample Problem |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
4.3.2 Evaluation of the performance by calculating nC and nC/nD |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
4.4 Comparison for the Crosswise and Triangular Models |
|
|
73 | (3) |
|
4.4.1 Comparison via the calculation of the ratio nc/nT |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
4.4.2 A theoretical justification |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
4.5 The Triangular Model for Two-sample Problem |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
5 The Multi-category Triangular Model |
|
79 | (12) |
|
5.1 A Brief Literature Review |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (2) |
|
5.2.1 Design of questionnaire |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 Determination of the non-sensitive question |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
5.3 Likelihood-based Inferences |
|
|
82 | (4) |
|
5.3.1 MLEs via the EM algorithm |
|
|
82 | (2) |
|
5.3.2 Asymptotic confidence intervals |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
5.3.3 Bootstrap confidence intervals |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
5.5 Questionnaire on Sexual Activities in Korean Adolescents |
|
|
87 | (4) |
6 The Hidden Sensitivity Model |
|
91 | (28) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
6.2.2 The design of questionnaire |
|
|
92 | (2) |
|
6.3 Likelihood-based Inferences |
|
|
94 | (4) |
|
6.3.1 MLEs via the EM algorithm |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Bootstrap confidence intervals |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
6.3.3 Testing of association |
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
6.4 Information Loss and Design Consideration |
|
|
98 | (2) |
|
6.4.1 Information loss due to the introduction of the non-sensitive variate |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
6.4.2 Design of the cooperative parameters |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (6) |
|
6.5.1 Comparison of the likelihood ratio test with the chi-squared test |
|
|
100 | (4) |
|
6.5.2 The probability of obtaining valid estimates |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
6.6 Bayesian Inferences under Dirichlet Prior |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
6.6.3 Generation of posterior samples via the DA algorithm |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
6.7 Bayesian Inferences under Other Priors |
|
|
107 | (7) |
|
6.7.1 Orthogonal parameter space |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
6.7.2 Joint prior for modeling independence with constraints |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
6.7.3 Joint prior for modeling negative correlation structure |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
6.7.4 Joint prior for modeling positive correlation structure |
|
|
110 | (4) |
|
6.8 Analyzing HIV Data in an AIDS Study |
|
|
114 | (5) |
|
6.8.1 Likelihood-based methods |
|
|
114 | (3) |
|
|
117 | (2) |
7 The Parallel Model |
|
119 | (38) |
|
7.1 The Unrelated Question Model |
|
|
120 | (6) |
|
|
120 | (1) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
7.1.3 Relative efficiency |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
7.1.4 Degree of privacy protection |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
7.2 A Non-randomized Unrelated Question Model: The Parallel Model |
|
|
126 | (8) |
|
7.2.1 The survey design for the parallel model |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
7.2.2 Connection between the parallel model and the unrelated question model |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
7.2.3 Asymptotic properties of the MLE |
|
|
129 | (5) |
|
7.3 Comparison with the Crosswise Model |
|
|
134 | (7) |
|
7.3.1 The difference between variances |
|
|
135 | (4) |
|
7.3.2 Relative efficiency of the crosswise model to the parallel model |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
7.3.3 Degree of privacy protection |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
7.4 Comparison with the Triangular Model |
|
|
141 | (5) |
|
7.4.1 The difference between variances |
|
|
141 | (3) |
|
7.4.2 Relative efficiency of the triangular model to the parallel model |
|
|
144 | (2) |
|
7.4.3 Degree of privacy protection |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
7.5.1 Posterior moments in closed-form |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
7.5.2 Calculation of the posterior mode via the EM algorithm |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
7.5.3 Generation of i.i.d. posterior samples via the exact IBF sampling |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
7.6 An Example: Induced Abortion in Mexico |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
7.7 A Case Study on College Students' Premarital Sexual Behavior at Wuhan |
|
|
150 | (3) |
|
7.8 A Case Study on Plagiarism at The University of Hong Kong |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
|
155 | (2) |
8 Sample Size Calculation for the Parallel Model |
|
157 | (20) |
|
8.1 Sample Sizes for One-sample Problem |
|
|
157 | (6) |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
8.1.3 Evaluation of the performance by comparing exact power with asymptotic power |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
8.1.4 Evaluation of the performance by calculating np and np/nD |
|
|
160 | (3) |
|
8.2 Comparison with the Crosswise Model |
|
|
163 | (5) |
|
8.2.1 Numerical comparisons |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
8.2.2 A theoretical justification |
|
|
163 | (5) |
|
8.3 Comparison with the Triangular Model |
|
|
168 | (4) |
|
8.3.1 Numerical comparisons |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
8.3.2 A theoretical justification |
|
|
169 | (3) |
|
8.4 Sample Size for Two-sample Problem |
|
|
172 | (2) |
|
|
174 | (3) |
9 The Multi-category Parallel Model |
|
177 | (30) |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
9.2 Likelihood-based Inferences |
|
|
179 | (6) |
|
9.2.1 MLEs via the EM algorithm |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
9.2.2 Two bootstrap confidence intervals |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
9.2.3 Explicit solutions to the valid estimators |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
9.2.4 Three asymptotic confidence intervals |
|
|
182 | (3) |
|
|
185 | (3) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
9.3.2 Calculation of the posterior mode via the EM algorithm |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
9.3.3 Generation of posterior samples via the data augmentation algorithm |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
9.4 A Special Case of the Multi-category Parallel Model |
|
|
188 | (6) |
|
9.4.1 A four-category parallel model |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
9.4.2 Testing hypotheses for association |
|
|
188 | (3) |
|
9.4.3 Comparison of the likelihood ratio test with the chi-squared test |
|
|
191 | (3) |
|
9.5 Comparison with the Multi-category Triangular Model |
|
|
194 | (5) |
|
9.5.1 The difference between the trace of two variance-covariance matrices |
|
|
194 | (4) |
|
9.5.2 Degree of privacy protection |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (4) |
|
9.6.1 The income and sexual partner data |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
9.6.2 Likelihood-based analysis |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
203 | (4) |
10 A Variant of the Parallel Model |
|
207 | (34) |
|
10.1 The Survey Design and Basic Properties |
|
|
207 | (6) |
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
|
209 | (2) |
|
10.1.3 Relative efficiency |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
10.1.4 Degree of privacy protection |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
10.2 Statistical Inferences on π |
|
|
213 | (6) |
|
10.2.1 An unbiased estimator of the variance of πV |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
10.2.2 Three asymptotic confidence intervals of π for large sample sizes |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
10.2.3 The exact (Clopper-Pearson) confidence interval |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
10.2.4 A modified MLE of π and its asymptotic property |
|
|
217 | (2) |
|
10.3 Statistical Inferences on Θ |
|
|
219 | (4) |
|
10.3.1 Three asymptotic confidence intervals of 9 for large sample sizes |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
10.3.2 The exact (Clopper-Pearson) confidence interval |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
10.3.3 Testing Hypotheses |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
10.4 Bootstrap Confidence Intervals |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
|
224 | (2) |
|
10.5.1 Posterior moments with explicit expressions |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
10.5.2 Calculation of the posterior modes via the EM algorithm |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
10.5.3 Generation of i.i.d. posterior samples via the exact IBF sampling |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
10.6 Comparison with the Crosswise Model |
|
|
226 | (3) |
|
10.6.1 The difference of variances |
|
|
226 | (2) |
|
10.6.2 Relative efficiency of the crosswise model to the variant of the parallel model |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
10.7 Comparison with the Triangular Model |
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
10.7.1 The difference of variances |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
10.7.2 Relative efficiency of the triangular model to the variant of the parallel model |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
10.8 The Noncompliance Behavior |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
10.9 An Illustrative Example of Sexual Practices |
|
|
232 | (4) |
|
10.10 Case Studies on Cheating Behavior in Examinations |
|
|
236 | (4) |
|
10.10.1 Design and analysis under the assumption of complete compliance |
|
|
236 | (3) |
|
10.10.2 Design and analysis under the consideration of noncompliance |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (1) |
11 The Combination Questionnaire Model |
|
241 | (16) |
|
|
241 | (3) |
|
11.2 Likelihood-based Inferences |
|
|
244 | (5) |
|
11.2.1 MLEs via the EM algorithm |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
11.2.2 Asymptotic confidence intervals |
|
|
245 | (2) |
|
11.2.3 Bootstrap confidence intervals |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
11.2.4 The likelihood ratio test for testing association |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
|
249 | (1) |
|
11.4 Analyzing Cervical Cancer Data in Atlanta |
|
|
250 | (4) |
|
11.4.1 Likelihood-based inferences |
|
|
251 | (2) |
|
11.4.2 Bayesian inferences |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
11.5 Group Dirichlet Distribution |
|
|
254 | (3) |
|
11.5.1 The mode of a group Dirichlet density |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
11.5.2 Sampling from a group Dirichlet distribution |
|
|
255 | (2) |
Appendix A: The EM and DA Algorithms |
|
257 | (6) |
Appendix B: The Exact IBF Sampling |
|
263 | (2) |
Appendix C: Some Statistical Distributions |
|
265 | (6) |
List of Figures |
|
271 | (6) |
List of Tables |
|
277 | (4) |
References |
|
281 | (14) |
Author Index |
|
295 | (4) |
Subject Index |
|
299 | |