Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Intergenerational Justice [Kietas viršelis]

Edited by
  • Formatas: Hardback, 522 pages, aukštis x plotis: 246x174 mm, weight: 2650 g
  • Serija: The Library of Essays on Justice
  • Išleidimo metai: 09-May-2012
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 0754629856
  • ISBN-13: 9780754629856
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Hardback, 522 pages, aukštis x plotis: 246x174 mm, weight: 2650 g
  • Serija: The Library of Essays on Justice
  • Išleidimo metai: 09-May-2012
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 0754629856
  • ISBN-13: 9780754629856
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
The essays selected for this volume show how relations between past, current and future generations have become a major subject of philosophical research since the 1970s. The relations between people alive today with people who may exist in the future and people now deceased, differ from relations between contemporaries and in ways that raise new conceptual, logical and substantive questions. Among the questions addressed in this volume are: what is the status of people now deceased and people who may exist in the future? Can the latter be harmed by the actions of people alive today? What duties of justice do we have towards people with whom we can neither interact nor co-operate, and can people who are indirect victims of past injustices legitimately claim compensation? Answers to these questions are relevant in a number of policy areas, most notably in issues regarding reparations for historical injustice and responding to climate change and its consequences.
Acknowledgements vii
Series Preface ix
Introduction xi
PART I FOUNDATIONS
1 `Utilitarianism and New Generations', Mind, 76, pp. 62-72
3(12)
Jan Narveson
2 `Distributive Shares', in A Theory of Justice, second revised edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999, section 44, pp. 251-8
15(8)
John Rawls
3 `The Non-Identity Problem', in Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 351-79, 522-523
23(32)
Derek Parfit
4 `The Intractability of the Nonidentity Problem', in Melinda A. Roberts and David T. Wasserstein (eds), Harming Future People: Ethics, Genetics and The Nonidentity Problem, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 3-25
55(24)
David Heyd
5 `Surviving Duties and Symbolic Compensation', in Justice in Time. Responding to Historical Injustice, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 173-83. (originally published in French, 2003, `Obligations Persistantes et Reparation Symbolique', Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 101, pp. 105-22)
79(12)
Lukas H. Meyer
6 `Discounting the Future', Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23, pp. 128-56
91(30)
John Broome
7 `What Motivates Us to Care for the (Distant) Future?', in Axel Gosseries and Lukas H. Meyer (eds), Intergenerational Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 273-300
121(30)
Dieter Birnbacher
PART II SUBSTANTIVE PRINCIPLES OF INTERGENERATIONAL JUSTICE
8 `Wrongful Life, Procreative Responsibility, and the Significance of Harm', Legal Theory, 5, pp. 117-48
151(32)
Seana Valentine Shiffrin
9 `Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice', in Andrew Dobson (ed.), Fairness and Futurity. Essays on Environmental Sustainability, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 93-117, 291
183(26)
Brian Barry
10 `Nonideal Theory', in The Law of Peoples, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, sections 15 and 16, pp. 105-20
209(16)
John Rawls
11 `Enough for the Future', in Axel Gosseries and Lukas H. Meyer (eds), Intergenerational Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 219-48
225(30)
Lukas H. Meyer
Dominic Roser
12 `Three Models of Intergenerational Reciprocity', in Axel Gosseries and Lukas H. Meyer (eds), Intergenerational Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 119-46
255(28)
Axel Gosseries
13 `Life Extension versus Replacement', Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25, pp. 211-27
283(18)
Gustaf Arrhenius
14 `The Pure Intergenerational Problem', The Monist, 86, pp. 481-500
301(20)
Stephen M. Gardiner
15 `Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged', Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13, pp. 203-28 (reprinted in Matt Matravers and Lukas H. Meyer (eds) (2011), Democracy, Equality, and Justice, London: Routledge, pp. 203-28)
321(28)
Simon Caney
PART III NORMATIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF HISTORICAL INJUSTICES AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES
16 `The New Indian Claims and Original Rights to Land', Social Theory and Practice, 4, pp. 249-72
349(24)
David Lyons
17 `Superseding Historic Injustice', Ethics, 103, pp. 4-28
373(26)
Jeremy Waldron
18 `The Apology Paradox', Philosophical Quarterly, 50, pp. 470-75
399(6)
Janna Thompson
19 `Transgenerational Compensation', Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33, pp. 181-201
405(20)
George Sher
20 `Who Can Be Wronged?', Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31, pp. 98-118
425(20)
Rahul Kumar
21 `On Benefiting from Injustice', Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 37, pp. 129-52
445(24)
Daniel Butt
22 `Climate Justice and Historical Emissions', Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13, pp. 229-53 (reprinted in Matt Matravers and Lukas H. Meyer (eds) (2011), Democracy, Equality, and Justice, London: Routledge, pp. 229-53)
469(26)
Lukas H. Meyer
Dominic Roser
Name Index 495
Lukas H. Meyer is Professor of Philosophy and Head of the Department of Philosophy, University of Graz, Austria