Editors |
|
v | |
Contributors |
|
vii | |
Preface |
|
xxix | |
Chapter 1 The Law Governing Res Judicata in International Commercial Arbitration |
|
1 | (18) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
1.02 Background: The Doctrine of Res Judicata and International Commercial Arbitration |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
A The Doctrine of Res Judicata |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
B Res Judicata and International Commercial Arbitration |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1.03 The Law Governing Res Judicata in International Commercial Arbitration |
|
|
5 | (11) |
|
A The Choice-of-Law Approach |
|
|
6 | (5) |
|
1 Law of the Place Where a New Claim Is Brought |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
2 Law of the Place Where a Prior Award Was Made |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
3 Law of Some Other State |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
4 Critique of the Choice-of-Law Approach |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
|
11 | (23) |
|
1 Rationale for Adopting International Standards |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
2 Sources of International Standards |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
a Public International Law Jurisprudence |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
b The New York Convention |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
c ILA Recommendations on Res Judicata and Arbitration |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
3 Critique of the International Approach |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (3) |
Chapter 2 Assignments 'Mid-Arbitration': Some Practical Considerations |
|
19 | (12) |
|
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
2.02 Which Law Applies to What? |
|
|
19 | (4) |
|
2.03 Determining the Law Applicable to the 'Transfer': The Importance of Qualification |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
2.04 The Requirement to Give Notice of an Assignment Mid-arbitration |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
2.05 Consent as a Proposed Requirement for an Assignment Mid-arbitration |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
|
28 | (3) |
Chapter 3 Exploring the Interpretative and Jurisdictional Consequences of Including an Investment Chapter in a Free Trade Agreement |
|
31 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
3.02 An Overview of the Investment Chapter and Its Place in the FTA |
|
|
34 | (8) |
|
A The Substantive Obligations |
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
B Chapter-Specific Qualifications of Substantive Obligations and Textual Directives to Tribunals |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
C Extra-Chapter Eleven Qualifications of Substantive Obligations and Textual Directives to Tribunals |
|
|
39 | (3) |
|
3.03 Interpretative Aspects and Mechanisms of Chapter Eleven |
|
|
42 | (6) |
|
A A Limited Jurisdictional Mandate Combined with the Duty to Apply the Agreement and 'The Applicable Rules of International Law' |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
B The NAFTA Parties' Reservation of Rights to Provide Interpretative Guidance to Tribunals |
|
|
44 | (4) |
|
1 Interventions of Non-disputing NAFTA Parties |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
2 Binding Interpretations |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
3.04 Tribunal Encounters with Jurisdictional Limits |
|
|
48 | (7) |
|
A Limitations on Tribunal's Subject-Matter Jurisdiction? |
|
|
48 | (3) |
|
B Tribunal Encounters with Unexpressed Territorial Limitations |
|
|
51 | (4) |
|
|
55 | (2) |
Chapter 4 The Temptation of Domesticity: An Evolving Challenge in Arbitration |
|
57 | (14) |
|
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
4.02 The International Provenance of National Arbitration Legislation |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
4.03 Enforcing and Challenging Awards |
|
|
60 | (4) |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
|
62 | (2) |
|
4.04 Supporting Arbitral Processes |
|
|
64 | (2) |
|
A Stay and Referral to Arbitration |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (4) |
|
A Residual Discretion to Enforce |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
B Stay of Enforcement Judgment |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
|
70 | (1) |
Chapter 5 Interaction of Laws in International Arbitration: An Asian Perspective |
|
71 | (16) |
|
Tan Sri Dato' Cecil Abraham |
|
|
|
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
5.02 Interaction of Legal Issues Relating to the Agreement to Arbitrate |
|
|
72 | (3) |
|
5.03 The Conflict of Law Method to Determining the Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement in the Absence of Choice |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
5.04 The Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement in the Absence of Choice of Law: Survey of Asian Jurisdictions |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
5.05 The Presumption of Separability |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
5.06 Practical Implications on Drafting Arbitration Agreements and Future Directions |
|
|
81 | (3) |
|
|
84 | (3) |
Chapter 6 Balancing Party Autonomy, Jurisdiction and the Integrity of Arbitration: Where to Draw the Line? |
|
87 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
6.02 Party Autonomy and Its Limits |
|
|
88 | (2) |
|
6.03 Jurisdiction and Party Autonomy: The Arbitrability of Trust Disputes |
|
|
90 | (6) |
|
6.04 Natural Justice and Party Autonomy: Should Parties Be Able to Consent to an Arbitrator Who Has a Clear Conflict of Interest? |
|
|
96 | (9) |
|
|
105 | (2) |
Chapter 7 Jurisdictional Findings on Provisional Measures Applications in International Arbitration |
|
107 | (12) |
|
|
|
|
7.01 Antecedent Question: Are Any Issues Presented with Regard to Tribunals' Specific Power to Award Provisional Measures? |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
7.02 Assuming that the Tribunal Has the Power to Order Provisional Measures, Why Is a Showing of Jurisdiction over the Underlying Dispute Necessary? |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
7.03 Why Does a Tribunal Need to Be Able to Order Provisional Measures Prior to a Finding of Ultimate Jurisdiction? |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
7.04 What Does Prima Facie Jurisdiction Mean? |
|
|
114 | (3) |
|
|
117 | (2) |
Chapter 8 Work in Progress: Res Judicata and Issue Estoppel in Investment Arbitration |
|
119 | (12) |
|
|
|
8.01 Doctrine of Res Judicata |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
8.02 Doctrine of Issue Estoppel |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
8.03 Res Judicata and Issue Estoppel in Investment Arbitration |
|
|
122 | (4) |
|
8.04 Expansion of the Persona Requirement by Issue Estoppel |
|
|
126 | (2) |
|
|
128 | (3) |
Chapter 9 Choosing the Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement |
|
131 | (20) |
|
|
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
9.03 The Framework for the Analysis |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
9.04 The English Authorities |
|
|
134 | (2) |
|
9.05 Separability and Choice of Law |
|
|
136 | (3) |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
9.07 The Correct Analysis in Principle |
|
|
141 | (7) |
|
A No Choice-of-Law Clause: The Significance of the Seat |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
B Express Choice of Law in the Matrix Contract |
|
|
144 | (3) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
9.08 The Validation Principle |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
|
149 | (2) |
Chapter 10 Evidentiary Inferences: Do Choice of Law and Seat Make a Difference? |
|
151 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
10.01 The Origin and Characterisation of Adverse Inferences |
|
|
152 | (4) |
|
10.02 The Legal Framework for International Arbitration: The Importance of Choice of Law and Seat |
|
|
156 | (4) |
|
10.03 The Law(s) Applicable to Evidentiary Inferences in International Arbitration |
|
|
160 | (3) |
|
A Adverse Inferences: Procedural or Substantive? |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
B The Limited Guidance Provided by the Traditional Sources of Law |
|
|
161 | (2) |
|
10.04 The Emergence of a Transnational Lex Evidentia of Adverse Inferences? |
|
|
163 | (8) |
|
A The Source of a Tribunal's Power to Draw Adverse Inferences |
|
|
163 | (5) |
|
B Limits to Arbitral Discretion: The Role of the Law of the Seat |
|
|
168 | (3) |
|
10.05 The Influence of Choice of Law on the Substantive Consequences of the Adverse Inference |
|
|
171 | (3) |
|
|
174 | (1) |
Chapter 11 Legal Criteria for Granting Relief in Emergency Arbitrator Proceedings: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Go from Here? |
|
175 | (18) |
|
|
|
11.01 Introduction and Scope |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
11.02 The Basic Framework of EA Proceedings |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
11.03 The Threefold Legal Criteria for Granting Emergency Relief in International Arbitration |
|
|
177 | (10) |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
C Risk of Substantial Harm |
|
|
183 | (4) |
|
11.04 Towards a Differently Weighted Legal Criteria |
|
|
187 | (5) |
|
A The Why: Architectural Peculiarities of EA Proceedings |
|
|
187 | (2) |
|
B The How: Reconsidering the Second and Third Criteria |
|
|
189 | (3) |
|
|
192 | (1) |
Chapter 12 Unintended Consequences |
|
193 | (10) |
|
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
A An Important Provision of English Statute Law |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
12.02 Section 136(i) Generally |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
12.03 Section 136(i) in Practice: A Cautionary Tale |
|
|
194 | (10) |
|
A Some Preliminary Conclusions Arising from the English Case Law |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
B What Does Any of This Matter for an International Arbitration? |
|
|
200 | (3) |
Chapter 13 Mandatory Laws: Getting the Right Law in the Right Place |
|
203 | (14) |
|
|
|
13.01 Party Autonomy and Mandatory Rules of Law |
|
|
204 | (7) |
|
A Mandatory Rules of the Proper Law |
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
B Mandatory Rules of Law Outside the Proper Law |
|
|
207 | (4) |
|
1 Laws of the Place of Arbitration |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
2 Law of the Place of Performance |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
3 Personal Laws of the Parties |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
4 Laws of the Place of Enforcement |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
5 Transnational Public Policy |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
13.02 An Attempt to Get It Right |
|
|
211 | (5) |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
E State Legal Expansionism |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
H Arbitrators' Discretion/Self-Interest |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
13.03 Still Getting There |
|
|
216 | (1) |
Chapter 14 Intra-EU BITS: Competence and Consequences |
|
217 | (26) |
|
|
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
|
218 | (2) |
|
14.03 Competence and Applicable Law |
|
|
220 | (18) |
|
|
220 | (5) |
|
B The CJEU and Its Case Law |
|
|
225 | (13) |
|
1 Opinion 1/91 - The EEA Court |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
2 Opinion 1/92 - The EFTA Court |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
3 Opinion 1/00 - The Joint Committee for the European Common Aviation Area |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (2) |
|
6 Opinion 1/09 - Patents Court |
|
|
230 | (2) |
|
7 Opinion 2/13 - European Court of Human Rights |
|
|
232 | (2) |
|
8 Implications of CJEU Case Law |
|
|
234 | (2) |
|
9 Implications for Brexit? |
|
|
236 | (2) |
|
|
238 | (4) |
|
A To What Extent Should Tribunals Take into Account the CJEU's Decision? |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
B Set-Aside, Revision and Annulment |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
|
240 | (2) |
|
|
242 | (1) |
Chapter 15 Consolidation of Cases at ICSID |
|
243 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
243 | (2) |
|
15.02 What Is Consolidation? |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
15.03 The Arguments for and Against Consolidation |
|
|
246 | (2) |
|
15.04 The Basis for Consolidation at ICSID |
|
|
248 | (1) |
|
|
249 | (7) |
|
15.06 Mandatory Consolidation under Treaty Provisions |
|
|
256 | (3) |
|
15.07 Other Treaty Consolidation Provisions |
|
|
259 | (2) |
|
15.08 Consolidation under Commercial Arbitration Rules |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
15.09 Considerations for Amendment of ICSID Rules |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
|
263 | (2) |
Chapter 16 The Chimera of Admissibility in International Arbitration |
|
265 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
265 | (4) |
|
|
269 | (12) |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
B The Experience of ICSID Tribunals: Overview |
|
|
271 | (2) |
|
C The Experience of ICSID Tribunals: The BIT Precondition Objection |
|
|
273 | (8) |
|
|
273 | (4) |
|
|
277 | (4) |
|
|
281 | (6) |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
B The ICJ's Understanding of Admissibility |
|
|
282 | (5) |
|
|
287 | (2) |
Chapter 17 Res Judicata and the "Could Have Been Claims" |
|
289 | (14) |
|
|
17.01 Res Judicata in General |
|
|
289 | (2) |
|
17.02 The Law Applicable to the Res Judicata Issue |
|
|
291 | (2) |
|
17.03 Toward a Broad Conception of Res Judicata |
|
|
293 | (5) |
|
17.04 Should Res Judicata Cover the "Could Have Been Claims"? |
|
|
298 | (5) |
Chapter 18 The Substantive Rights of Parties in Arbitration: Voie Directe and Voie Indirecte |
|
303 | (12) |
|
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
18.02 Voie Directe and Voie Indirecte |
|
|
304 | (3) |
|
A Background and Prescription |
|
|
304 | (2) |
|
|
306 | (1) |
|
18.03 Voie Indirecte in Practice |
|
|
307 | (3) |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
B Most Closely Connected to the Dispute Test |
|
|
307 | (1) |
|
C Closest Connection Test |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
D The Domicile of the Person Exercising Characteristic Performance |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
|
309 | (1) |
|
F International Conflict of Laws Rules |
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
18.04 Voie Directe in Practice |
|
|
310 | (4) |
|
A General Principles of Private International Law |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
B Validity and Party Autonomy |
|
|
312 | (1) |
|
C Parties' Expectations and Intentions |
|
|
312 | (2) |
|
|
314 | (1) |
Chapter 19 ICANN's Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility |
|
315 | (16) |
|
|
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
|
316 | (2) |
|
A History of ICANN and Internet Governance |
|
|
316 | (1) |
|
B ICANN's Tasks and Technical Background |
|
|
317 | (1) |
|
|
317 | (1) |
|
19.03 ICANN's ADR Mechanisms |
|
|
318 | (6) |
|
A Second-Level Domain Disputes |
|
|
318 | (1) |
|
B Top-Level Domain Disputes |
|
|
319 | (3) |
|
1 ADR Mechanisms Prior to the Delegation of a New gTLD |
|
|
320 | (1) |
|
2 ADR Mechanisms after the Delegation of a New gTLD |
|
|
321 | (1) |
|
C Protection Against Actions by ICANN |
|
|
322 | (2) |
|
1 Internal Reconsideration Process |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
2 Independent Review Process |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
19.04 Compatibility of ICANN's Dispute Resolution Mechanisms with "Relevant Principles of International Law"? |
|
|
324 | (5) |
|
|
324 | (1) |
|
|
325 | (2) |
|
|
327 | (2) |
|
|
329 | (2) |
Chapter 20 Practices, Arbitral Duties and Effects of Awards in Default Proceedings |
|
331 | (14) |
|
|
20.01 Arbitration Rules for Default Proceedings |
|
|
332 | (3) |
|
20.02 Arbitral Duties in Default Proceedings |
|
|
335 | (3) |
|
20.03 Due Process and the Unrepresented Party |
|
|
338 | (1) |
|
20.04 Enforcement of Default Judgments: Vizcaya Case |
|
|
339 | (1) |
|
20.05 Communications in Default Proceedings |
|
|
340 | (1) |
|
20.06 Default Proceedings in National Systems |
|
|
341 | (2) |
|
|
343 | (2) |
Chapter 21 The Law Applicable to Non-contractual Claims in International Commercial Arbitration |
|
345 | (12) |
|
|
|
345 | (5) |
|
A Example from Practice: A Lesson from One of Asia's Top International Arbitrators |
|
|
346 | (2) |
|
B Characterisation: The Determination of Whether a Claim Is Contractual or Not |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
C Arbitrability: Non-contractual Claims and the Scope of the Arbitration Clause |
|
|
349 | (1) |
|
21.02 Parties' Choice of the Law Applicable to Non-contractual Claims in Arbitration |
|
|
350 | (3) |
|
A Can Arbitrating Parties Choose the Law to Govern Their Non-contractual Claims? |
|
|
350 | (2) |
|
B Have the Parties Chosen the Law to Govern Their Non-contractual Claims? |
|
|
352 | (1) |
|
21.03 Law Applicable to Tort Claims in the Absence of Party Choice |
|
|
353 | (2) |
|
|
355 | (2) |
Chapter 22 Life after Death: The Arbitral Tribunal's Role Following Its Final Award |
|
357 | (16) |
|
|
|
357 | (3) |
|
A The Functus Officio Doctrine |
|
|
358 | (2) |
|
22.02 Correction and Interpretation of an Award and Additional Awards |
|
|
360 | (8) |
|
|
368 | (2) |
|
22.04 Notification and Publication of an Award |
|
|
370 | (3) |
Chapter 23 Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Choice of Law in International Arbitration |
|
373 | (12) |
|
|
|
373 | (12) |
|
|
374 | (3) |
|
|
377 | (8) |
Chapter 24 A Principled Approach Towards the Law Governing Arbitration Agreements |
|
385 | (10) |
|
|
|
|
385 | (2) |
|
24.02 Two Opposing Views: The Law of the Main Contract or the Law of the Seat? |
|
|
387 | (4) |
|
A A Presumption in Favour of the Governing Law of the Contract |
|
|
387 | (2) |
|
B A Presumption in Favour of the Law of the Seat |
|
|
389 | (2) |
|
24.03 A Pro-validation Approach? |
|
|
391 | (2) |
|
24.04 A Principled Canon for Choice of Law |
|
|
393 | (1) |
|
|
394 | (1) |
Index |
|
395 | |