Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Choice of Law in International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum Michael Pryles

  • Formatas: 442 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 24-Apr-2016
  • Leidėjas: Kluwer Law International
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9789041186409
  • Formatas: 442 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 24-Apr-2016
  • Leidėjas: Kluwer Law International
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9789041186409

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

About this book:

Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Choice of Law in International Arbitration, as the name suggests, discusses the jurisdiction, admissibility and choice of law provisions applied in the arbitration. These three elements play a prominent role in administering arbitration proceedings and are oft-cited in several awards and court decisions, particularly in cases transcending boundaries. In light of the growing demand for international arbitration, there is a need for literature to discuss these elements and analyse how they are applied across various jurisdictions. Although there are books available on each of these factors separately, this book specializes in analysing all these three aspects together.

This book is a collection of essays in honour of the distinguished international lawyer Michael Pryles, who launched a meteoric career as an arbitrator after many years of teaching and writing on conflicts of law and other topics and made a mark on arbitral law and practice that is recognized worldwide.

What’s in this book:

In this book, over forty prominent arbitrators and arbitration scholars offer insightful essays on the above-mentioned thorny matters and examine specific issues and topics such as the following:

  • res judicata;
  • investment arbitration;
  • free trade agreements;
  • party autonomy;
  • application of provisional measures;
  • issue estoppel;
  • evidentiary inferences;
  • interim measures;
  • emergency and default proceedings;
  • the intersection of financing and jurisdiction;
  • consolidation of cases; and
  • non-contractual claims.

How this will help you:

Remarkable for its roster of highly distinguished contributors, this book is the only in-depth treatment of its subject. By turns thought-provoking and practical, this book is bound to appeal to and be put to use by arbitrators and other lawyers, who handle international cases, to gain insight into the factors involved in affecting arbitral decisions. This book also proves to be of great value to global law firms and companies doing transnational business to confidently maze through the complex arbitral laws around the globe and is of great academic interest.

Editors v
Contributors vii
Preface xxix
Chapter 1 The Law Governing Res Judicata in International Commercial Arbitration 1(18)
Gary Born
Cavinder Bull
Jonathan Lim
Eunice Chan
1.01 Introduction
1(2)
1.02 Background: The Doctrine of Res Judicata and International Commercial Arbitration
3(2)
A The Doctrine of Res Judicata
3(1)
B Res Judicata and International Commercial Arbitration
4(1)
1.03 The Law Governing Res Judicata in International Commercial Arbitration
5(11)
A The Choice-of-Law Approach
6(5)
1 Law of the Place Where a New Claim Is Brought
6(1)
2 Law of the Place Where a Prior Award Was Made
7(1)
3 Law of Some Other State
8(1)
4 Critique of the Choice-of-Law Approach
9(2)
B International Approach
11(23)
1 Rationale for Adopting International Standards
12(1)
2 Sources of International Standards
12(1)
a Public International Law Jurisprudence
13(1)
b The New York Convention
14(1)
c ILA Recommendations on Res Judicata and Arbitration
15(1)
3 Critique of the International Approach
15(1)
1.04 Conclusion
16(3)
Chapter 2 Assignments 'Mid-Arbitration': Some Practical Considerations 19(12)
Christopher Lau
2.01 Introduction
19(1)
2.02 Which Law Applies to What?
19(4)
2.03 Determining the Law Applicable to the 'Transfer': The Importance of Qualification
23(3)
2.04 The Requirement to Give Notice of an Assignment Mid-arbitration
26(2)
2.05 Consent as a Proposed Requirement for an Assignment Mid-arbitration
28(1)
2.06 Conclusion
28(3)
Chapter 3 Exploring the Interpretative and Jurisdictional Consequences of Including an Investment
Chapter in a Free Trade Agreement
31(26)
Christopher Thomas
Sarah Lint
Emily Choo
3.01 Introduction
32(2)
3.02 An Overview of the Investment
Chapter and Its Place in the FTA
34(8)
A The Substantive Obligations
34(3)
B
Chapter-Specific Qualifications of Substantive Obligations and Textual Directives to Tribunals
37(2)
C Extra-Chapter Eleven Qualifications of Substantive Obligations and Textual Directives to Tribunals
39(3)
3.03 Interpretative Aspects and Mechanisms of
Chapter Eleven
42(6)
A A Limited Jurisdictional Mandate Combined with the Duty to Apply the Agreement and 'The Applicable Rules of International Law'
42(2)
B The NAFTA Parties' Reservation of Rights to Provide Interpretative Guidance to Tribunals
44(4)
1 Interventions of Non-disputing NAFTA Parties
44(1)
2 Binding Interpretations
45(3)
3.04 Tribunal Encounters with Jurisdictional Limits
48(7)
A Limitations on Tribunal's Subject-Matter Jurisdiction?
48(3)
B Tribunal Encounters with Unexpressed Territorial Limitations
51(4)
3.05 Conclusion
55(2)
Chapter 4 The Temptation of Domesticity: An Evolving Challenge in Arbitration 57(14)
Justice Clyde Croft
4.01 Introduction
57(1)
4.02 The International Provenance of National Arbitration Legislation
58(2)
4.03 Enforcing and Challenging Awards
60(4)
A The Cameron Case
61(1)
B The Sauber Case
62(2)
4.04 Supporting Arbitral Processes
64(2)
A Stay and Referral to Arbitration
64(1)
B Subpoenas
65(1)
4.05 The Gutnick Case
66(4)
A Residual Discretion to Enforce
68(1)
B Stay of Enforcement Judgment
68(2)
4.06 Conclusion
70(1)
Chapter 5 Interaction of Laws in International Arbitration: An Asian Perspective 71(16)
Tan Sri Dato' Cecil Abraham
Aniz Ahmad Amirudin
Daniel Chua Wei Chuen
5.01 Introduction
71(1)
5.02 Interaction of Legal Issues Relating to the Agreement to Arbitrate
72(3)
5.03 The Conflict of Law Method to Determining the Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement in the Absence of Choice
75(2)
5.04 The Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement in the Absence of Choice of Law: Survey of Asian Jurisdictions
77(2)
A Malaysia
77(1)
B Singapore
78(1)
C Hong Kong
78(1)
D India
79(1)
5.05 The Presumption of Separability
79(2)
5.06 Practical Implications on Drafting Arbitration Agreements and Future Directions
81(3)
5.07 Conclusion
84(3)
Chapter 6 Balancing Party Autonomy, Jurisdiction and the Integrity of Arbitration: Where to Draw the Line? 87(20)
David A.R. Williams
Anna Kirk
6.01 Introduction
87(1)
6.02 Party Autonomy and Its Limits
88(2)
6.03 Jurisdiction and Party Autonomy: The Arbitrability of Trust Disputes
90(6)
6.04 Natural Justice and Party Autonomy: Should Parties Be Able to Consent to an Arbitrator Who Has a Clear Conflict of Interest?
96(9)
6.05 Conclusion
105(2)
Chapter 7 Jurisdictional Findings on Provisional Measures Applications in International Arbitration 107(12)
Donald Francis Donovan
David W. Rivkin
Christopher K. Tahbaz
7.01 Antecedent Question: Are Any Issues Presented with Regard to Tribunals' Specific Power to Award Provisional Measures?
110(1)
7.02 Assuming that the Tribunal Has the Power to Order Provisional Measures, Why Is a Showing of Jurisdiction over the Underlying Dispute Necessary?
111(2)
7.03 Why Does a Tribunal Need to Be Able to Order Provisional Measures Prior to a Finding of Ultimate Jurisdiction?
113(1)
7.04 What Does Prima Facie Jurisdiction Mean?
114(3)
7.05 Conclusion
117(2)
Chapter 8 Work in Progress: Res Judicata and Issue Estoppel in Investment Arbitration 119(12)
Gavan Griffith
Isabella Seif
8.01 Doctrine of Res Judicata
119(1)
8.02 Doctrine of Issue Estoppel
120(2)
8.03 Res Judicata and Issue Estoppel in Investment Arbitration
122(4)
8.04 Expansion of the Persona Requirement by Issue Estoppel
126(2)
8.05 Conclusions
128(3)
Chapter 9 Choosing the Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement 131(20)
Ian Glick
V. Niranjan
9.01 Introduction
131(1)
9.02 Summary
132(1)
9.03 The Framework for the Analysis
133(1)
9.04 The English Authorities
134(2)
9.05 Separability and Choice of Law
136(3)
9.06 Depecage
139(2)
9.07 The Correct Analysis in Principle
141(7)
A No Choice-of-Law Clause: The Significance of the Seat
142(2)
B Express Choice of Law in the Matrix Contract
144(3)
C Two Qualifications
147(1)
9.08 The Validation Principle
148(1)
9.09 Conclusion
149(2)
Chapter 10 Evidentiary Inferences: Do Choice of Law and Seat Make a Difference? 151(24)
Karyl Nairn
Timothy G. Nelson
Paula F. Henin
10.01 The Origin and Characterisation of Adverse Inferences
152(4)
10.02 The Legal Framework for International Arbitration: The Importance of Choice of Law and Seat
156(4)
10.03 The Law(s) Applicable to Evidentiary Inferences in International Arbitration
160(3)
A Adverse Inferences: Procedural or Substantive?
160(1)
B The Limited Guidance Provided by the Traditional Sources of Law
161(2)
10.04 The Emergence of a Transnational Lex Evidentia of Adverse Inferences?
163(8)
A The Source of a Tribunal's Power to Draw Adverse Inferences
163(5)
B Limits to Arbitral Discretion: The Role of the Law of the Seat
168(3)
10.05 The Influence of Choice of Law on the Substantive Consequences of the Adverse Inference
171(3)
10.06 Conclusion
174(1)
Chapter 11 Legal Criteria for Granting Relief in Emergency Arbitrator Proceedings: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Go from Here? 175(18)
Kap-You Kim
Bhushan Satish
11.01 Introduction and Scope
175(1)
11.02 The Basic Framework of EA Proceedings
176(1)
11.03 The Threefold Legal Criteria for Granting Emergency Relief in International Arbitration
177(10)
A Urgency
179(1)
B Prospect of Success
180(3)
C Risk of Substantial Harm
183(4)
11.04 Towards a Differently Weighted Legal Criteria
187(5)
A The Why: Architectural Peculiarities of EA Proceedings
187(2)
B The How: Reconsidering the Second and Third Criteria
189(3)
11.05 Conclusion
192(1)
Chapter 12 Unintended Consequences 193(10)
Klaus Reichert
12.01 Introduction
193(1)
A An Important Provision of English Statute Law
194(1)
12.02 Section 136(i) Generally
194(1)
12.03 Section 136(i) in Practice: A Cautionary Tale
194(10)
A Some Preliminary Conclusions Arising from the English Case Law
199(1)
B What Does Any of This Matter for an International Arbitration?
200(3)
Chapter 13 Mandatory Laws: Getting the Right Law in the Right Place 203(14)
Lawrence G.S. Boo
Adriana Uson Ong
13.01 Party Autonomy and Mandatory Rules of Law
204(7)
A Mandatory Rules of the Proper Law
205(2)
B Mandatory Rules of Law Outside the Proper Law
207(4)
1 Laws of the Place of Arbitration
207(1)
2 Law of the Place of Performance
208(1)
3 Personal Laws of the Parties
209(1)
4 Laws of the Place of Enforcement
210(1)
5 Transnational Public Policy
211(1)
13.02 An Attempt to Get It Right
211(5)
A Party Autonomy
212(1)
B Justice
213(1)
C Consistency
213(1)
D Sovereign Support
213(1)
E State Legal Expansionism
214(1)
F Efficiency
214(1)
G Enforceability
215(1)
H Arbitrators' Discretion/Self-Interest
215(1)
13.03 Still Getting There
216(1)
Chapter 14 Intra-EU BITS: Competence and Consequences 217(26)
Peter Goldsmith
Boxun Yin
14.01 Introduction
217(1)
14.02 Background
218(2)
14.03 Competence and Applicable Law
220(18)
A Different Perspectives
220(5)
B The CJEU and Its Case Law
225(13)
1 Opinion 1/91 - The EEA Court
225(1)
2 Opinion 1/92 - The EFTA Court
226(1)
3 Opinion 1/00 - The Joint Committee for the European Common Aviation Area
226(1)
4 The MOX Plant Dispute
227(1)
5 Kadi
228(2)
6 Opinion 1/09 - Patents Court
230(2)
7 Opinion 2/13 - European Court of Human Rights
232(2)
8 Implications of CJEU Case Law
234(2)
9 Implications for Brexit?
236(2)
14.04 Consequences
238(4)
A To What Extent Should Tribunals Take into Account the CJEU's Decision?
238(1)
B Set-Aside, Revision and Annulment
239(1)
C Enforcement
240(2)
14.05 Conclusion
242(1)
Chapter 15 Consolidation of Cases at ICSID 243(22)
Chrysoula Mavromati
Meg Kinnear
15.01 Introduction
243(2)
15.02 What Is Consolidation?
245(1)
15.03 The Arguments for and Against Consolidation
246(2)
15.04 The Basis for Consolidation at ICSID
248(1)
15.05 Examples to Date
249(7)
15.06 Mandatory Consolidation under Treaty Provisions
256(3)
15.07 Other Treaty Consolidation Provisions
259(2)
15.08 Consolidation under Commercial Arbitration Rules
261(1)
15.09 Considerations for Amendment of ICSID Rules
262(1)
15.10 Conclusion
263(2)
Chapter 16 The Chimera of Admissibility in International Arbitration 265(24)
Michael Hwang
Lim Si Cheng
16.01 Introduction
265(4)
16.02 ICSID Arbitration
269(12)
A The Legal Framework
269(2)
B The Experience of ICSID Tribunals: Overview
271(2)
C The Experience of ICSID Tribunals: The BIT Precondition Objection
273(8)
1 The Story of the Swamp
273(4)
2 The Moral of the Story
277(4)
16.03 ICJ Proceedings
281(6)
A The Legal Framework
282(1)
B The ICJ's Understanding of Admissibility
282(5)
16.04 Conclusion
287(2)
Chapter 17 Res Judicata and the "Could Have Been Claims" 289(14)
Bernard Hanotiau
17.01 Res Judicata in General
289(2)
17.02 The Law Applicable to the Res Judicata Issue
291(2)
17.03 Toward a Broad Conception of Res Judicata
293(5)
17.04 Should Res Judicata Cover the "Could Have Been Claims"?
298(5)
Chapter 18 The Substantive Rights of Parties in Arbitration: Voie Directe and Voie Indirecte 303(12)
Doug Jones
18.01 Introduction
303(1)
18.02 Voie Directe and Voie Indirecte
304(3)
A Background and Prescription
304(2)
B The Need for Reasons
306(1)
18.03 Voie Indirecte in Practice
307(3)
A Rules of the Seat
307(1)
B Most Closely Connected to the Dispute Test
307(1)
C Closest Connection Test
308(1)
D The Domicile of the Person Exercising Characteristic Performance
308(1)
E Cumulative Method
309(1)
F International Conflict of Laws Rules
310(1)
18.04 Voie Directe in Practice
310(4)
A General Principles of Private International Law
311(1)
B Validity and Party Autonomy
312(1)
C Parties' Expectations and Intentions
312(2)
18.05 Conclusion
314(1)
Chapter 19 ICANN's Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility 315(16)
Klaus Sachs
Friederike Maria Fronius
19.01 Introduction
315(1)
19.02 What Is ICANN?
316(2)
A History of ICANN and Internet Governance
316(1)
B ICANN's Tasks and Technical Background
317(1)
C ICANN's Core Values
317(1)
19.03 ICANN's ADR Mechanisms
318(6)
A Second-Level Domain Disputes
318(1)
B Top-Level Domain Disputes
319(3)
1 ADR Mechanisms Prior to the Delegation of a New gTLD
320(1)
2 ADR Mechanisms after the Delegation of a New gTLD
321(1)
C Protection Against Actions by ICANN
322(2)
1 Internal Reconsideration Process
322(1)
2 Independent Review Process
323(1)
19.04 Compatibility of ICANN's Dispute Resolution Mechanisms with "Relevant Principles of International Law"?
324(5)
A ICANN and Human Rights
324(1)
B Due Process
325(2)
C Further Human Rights
327(2)
19.05 Conclusion
329(2)
Chapter 20 Practices, Arbitral Duties and Effects of Awards in Default Proceedings 331(14)
Julian Lew
20.01 Arbitration Rules for Default Proceedings
332(3)
20.02 Arbitral Duties in Default Proceedings
335(3)
20.03 Due Process and the Unrepresented Party
338(1)
20.04 Enforcement of Default Judgments: Vizcaya Case
339(1)
20.05 Communications in Default Proceedings
340(1)
20.06 Default Proceedings in National Systems
341(2)
20.07 Conclusion
343(2)
Chapter 21 The Law Applicable to Non-contractual Claims in International Commercial Arbitration 345(12)
Simon Greenberg
21.01 Introduction
345(5)
A Example from Practice: A Lesson from One of Asia's Top International Arbitrators
346(2)
B Characterisation: The Determination of Whether a Claim Is Contractual or Not
348(1)
C Arbitrability: Non-contractual Claims and the Scope of the Arbitration Clause
349(1)
21.02 Parties' Choice of the Law Applicable to Non-contractual Claims in Arbitration
350(3)
A Can Arbitrating Parties Choose the Law to Govern Their Non-contractual Claims?
350(2)
B Have the Parties Chosen the Law to Govern Their Non-contractual Claims?
352(1)
21.03 Law Applicable to Tort Claims in the Absence of Party Choice
353(2)
21.04 Concluding Remarks
355(2)
Chapter 22 Life after Death: The Arbitral Tribunal's Role Following Its Final Award 357(16)
Stuart Isaacs
22.01 Introduction
357(3)
A The Functus Officio Doctrine
358(2)
22.02 Correction and Interpretation of an Award and Additional Awards
360(8)
22.03 Time Limits
368(2)
22.04 Notification and Publication of an Award
370(3)
Chapter 23 Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Choice of Law in International Arbitration 373(12)
V.V. Veeder
23.01 Introduction
373(12)
A Costs
374(3)
B Interest
377(8)
Chapter 24 A Principled Approach Towards the Law Governing Arbitration Agreements 385(10)
Wendy J. Miles
Nelson Goh
24.01 Introduction
385(2)
24.02 Two Opposing Views: The Law of the Main Contract or the Law of the Seat?
387(4)
A A Presumption in Favour of the Governing Law of the Contract
387(2)
B A Presumption in Favour of the Law of the Seat
389(2)
24.03 A Pro-validation Approach?
391(2)
24.04 A Principled Canon for Choice of Law
393(1)
24.05 Conclusion
394(1)
Index 395