Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Just Words: Law, Language, and Power, Third Edition

3.79/5 (45 ratings by Goodreads)
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

Is it “just words” when a lawyer cross-examines a rape victim in the hopes of getting her to admit an interest in her attacker? Is it “just words” when the Supreme Court hands down a decision or when business people draw up a contract? In tackling the question of how an abstract entity exerts concrete power, Just Words focuses on what has become the central issue in law and language research: what language reveals about the nature of legal power. 

John M. Conley, William M. O'Barr, and Robin Conley Riner show how the microdynamics of the legal process and the largest questions of justice can be fruitfully explored through the field of linguistics. Each chapter covers a language-based approach to a different area of the law, from the cross-examinations of victims and witnesses to the inequities of divorce mediation. Combining analysis of common legal events with a broad range of scholarship on language and law, Just Words seeks the reality of power in the everyday practice and application of the law. As the only study of its type, the book is the definitive treatment of the topic and will be welcomed by students and specialists alike. This third edition brings this essential text up to date with new chapters on nonverbal, or “multimodal,” communication in legal settings and law, language, and race.
 
Preface to the Third Edition xi
Preface to the Second Edition xiii
Preface xv
Note on Transcript Conventions xvii
1 The Politics of Law and the Science of Talk
1(16)
Why We Wrote This Book
5(2)
Basic Concepts: Language, Discourse, and Power
7(4)
The Origins of Law and Language Research
11(4)
Sociolinguistics
11(2)
Law and Society
13(1)
Shortcomings of the Fields in Isolation
14(1)
Conclusion: Combining Concerns
15(2)
2 The Re victimization of Rape Victims
17(24)
Rape and Power
17(5)
Principles of Conversation Analysis
22(2)
The Conversation Analysis of Rape Trials
24(9)
Silence
25(2)
Question Form
27(1)
Topic Management
28(2)
Commentary
30(2)
The Witness's Capacity for Knowledge
32(1)
Is It Really about Rape?
33(7)
The Sexual Double Bind
35(2)
Sexual History
37(3)
Conclusion: Rape and the Power of Discourse
40(1)
3 The Language of Mediation
41(21)
What a Mediation Session Is Like
42(2)
Restoring Civility
44(4)
The Structure of Mediation
44(2)
The Moral Order of Mediation
46(1)
Summary
47(1)
The Macrodiscourse of Mediation
48(3)
The Microdiscourse of Mediation
51(7)
Conclusion: Is Mediator Bias Systematic?
58(4)
4 Speaking of Patriarchy
62(19)
Gender and Equality
63(2)
Stylistic Variation in Courtroom Talk
65(2)
Powerlessness and Patriarchy
67(1)
The Logic of Legal Accounts
68(8)
The Rule-Oriented Account
69(3)
The Relational Account
72(4)
Conclusion: An Alternative Vision of Justice
76(5)
5 A Natural History of Disputing
81(20)
Naming, Blaming, and Claiming
81(2)
A Language-Based Model of Naming and Blaming
83(3)
The Claiming Process
86(3)
What Happens When Disputes Reach the Legal System?
89(8)
Transformation in the Small Claims Court
89(4)
Transformation in the Lawyer's Office
93(4)
Reflections on Transformations
97(2)
Conclusion: Toward a Natural History of Disputing
99(2)
6 The Discourses of Law in Cross-Cultural Perspective
101(20)
Questioning Huli Women
107(2)
Goldman on Accident
109(7)
Verb Forms and Accidents
112(3)
Ergativity
115(1)
Repairing Relationships in Weyewa
116(2)
Conclusion: Has Legal Anthropology Missed the Point?
118(3)
7 Language Ideology and the Law
121(19)
Defining Terms
123(2)
The Importance of Studying Language Ideology
125(4)
The Power of Language Ideology in Legal Contexts
129(10)
Language Ideologies in American Courts
129(7)
Language Ideologies in Kenyan Divorce Courts
136(3)
Conclusion
139(1)
8 Forensic Linguistics
140(17)
The Law of Expert Witnesses
142(2)
Denning Forensic Linguistics
144(1)
Tracking the Footprints of Linguistics in the Law
145(9)
Elizabeth Loftus and Eyewitness Testimony
145(3)
Roger Shuy's Linguistic Battles
148(6)
Forensic Linguistics and Power
154(1)
Going Forward: A Linguistically Driven Forensic Linguistics
155(2)
9 Multimodal Communication in the Courtroom
157(15)
Defining Multimodality
158(1)
Multimodal Aspects of Legal Interaction
159(1)
Charles Goodwin: Ways of Seeing in the Rodney King Trial
160(4)
Gregory Matoesian: Reproducing Rape through Multimodal Interaction
164(3)
Robin Conley Riner: Multimodality and Capital Jury Decision-Making
167(4)
Law, Language, and Multimodality
171(1)
10 Language and Race in the Courtroom
172(18)
The Relationship between Race and Language
173(3)
AAVE in the Zimmerman Trial: The Prosecution's Case (Rickford and King 2016)
176(5)
AAVE in the Zimmerman Trial: The Defense's Cross-Examination (Slobe 2016)
181(4)
Pauses and Silence
183(1)
Deixis
184(1)
Linguistic Profiling
185(1)
Conclusion: Can Anything Be Done?
186(4)
11 Conclusion
190(11)
Where Does Legal Language Come From?
192(4)
Learning How to Argue
193(1)
How Do Lawyers Learn Legal Discourse?
194(2)
Comparative Legal Discourse
196(1)
Deconstructing Law Reform
197(1)
Sociolinguists in the Legal World
198(2)
Law and Society, Law and Language
200(1)
Notes 201(14)
References 215(18)
Index 233
John M. Conley is the William Rand Kenan, Jr., Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina Law School. William M. O'Barr is professor of cultural anthropology at Duke University where he also holds appointments in the Departments of English and Sociology. Robin Conley Riner is associate professor of anthropology at Marshall University.