Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Justification as Ignorance: An Essay in Epistemology

(University of Barcelona)
  • Formatas: 224 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 09-Mar-2021
  • Leidėjas: Oxford University Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780192635075
  • Formatas: 224 pages
  • Išleidimo metai: 09-Mar-2021
  • Leidėjas: Oxford University Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780192635075

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

Justification as Ignorance offers an original account of epistemic justification as both non-factive and luminous, vindicating core internalist intuitions without construing justification as an internal condition knowable by reflection alone. Sven Rosenkranz conceives of justification, in its doxastic and propositional varieties, as a kind of epistemic possibility of knowing and of being in a position to know. His account contrasts with recent alternative views that characterize justification in terms of the metaphysical possibility of knowing. Instead, he develops a suitable non-normal multi-modal epistemic logic for knowledge and being in a position to know that respects the finding that these notions create hyperintensional contexts. He also defends his conception of justification against well-known anti-luminosity arguments, shows that the account allows for fruitful applications and principled solutions to the lottery and preface paradoxes, and provides a metaphysics of justification and its varying degrees of strength that is compatible with core assumptions of the knowledge-first approach and disjunctivist conceptions of mental states.

Recenzijos

Rosenkranz is meticulous in laying the groundwork of a theory. He establishes that propositional justification is a feature of one's epistemic situation, rather than of one's beliefs, hence nonfactive. He further develops a multimodal epistemic logic to show that the luminosity of propositional justification entails the luminosity of doxastic justification. * L. A. Wilkinson, CHOICE Connect, Vol. 59 No. 8 *

Preface vii
1 Outline of a theory of justification
1(17)
2 Principles of epistemic logic I: Knowledge
18(19)
2.1 The objects of knowledge
20(7)
2.2 Principles of knowledge
27(10)
3 On being in a position to know
37(20)
3.1 Being in a position to know as the opportunity to know
37(5)
3.2 Seizing the opportunity to know
42(9)
3.3 Being in a position to know and responsive belief
51(2)
3.4 Being in a position to know and safe belief
53(4)
4 Principles of epistemic logic II: Being in a position to know
57(23)
4.1 Principles of being in a position to know
57(11)
4.2 Two non-standard principles
68(8)
4.3 Anti-luminosity L Williamson (2000)
76(4)
5 Two systems of epistemic logic
80(27)
5.1 The idealized system and the realistic system
82(12)
5.2 Semantic characterization of the idealized system
94(7)
5.3 Anti-luminosity II: The unmarked clock
101(6)
6 Prepositional and doxastic justification
107(31)
6.1 Two interpretative hypotheses
107(4)
6.2 Features of justification
111(8)
6.3 Alleged counterexamples
119(7)
6.4 Epistemic permissibility and epistemic blamelessness
126(5)
6.5 Justification, blamelessness, and reliability
131(7)
7 Applications
138(32)
7.1 Variation in epistemic standards
139(2)
7.2 The lottery paradox
141(3)
7.3 The lottery puzzle
144(6)
7.4 The preface paradox
150(5)
7.5 The debasing demon
155(4)
7.6 Procedural rules for belief
159(11)
8 Competing views
170(19)
8.1 Doxastic justification as the metaphysical possibility of knowing
171(9)
8.2 The normic theory of propositional justification
180(9)
9 Grounds for justification
189(40)
9.1 Features of grounding
190(11)
9.2 Evidence and evidential probability
201(4)
9.3 Strict grounds for justification I: Evidence
205(8)
9.4 Degrees of strength of justification
213(6)
9.5 Strict grounds for justification II: Evidential probabilities
219(10)
10 What's wrong with internalism?
229(35)
10.1 The case for accessibilism I: Accessible grounds
230(9)
10.2 The case for accessibilism II: Grounds as facts of accessibility
239(4)
10.3 The case for mentalism I: Explaining the structure of justification
243(8)
10.4 The case for mentalism II: The new evil demon
251(7)
10.5 Internalism without the internal
258(6)
Concluding remarks 264(5)
Appendix: The luminosity of some non-trivial condition 269(6)
Bibliography 275(8)
Index 283
Sven Rosenkranz is ICREA Research Professor at the University of Barcelona. Since 2014 he has been coordinator of the consolidated research group in analytic philosophy LOGOS, and from 2019 until 2021 serves as PI of the research project 'Justification, its Structure and Grounds'. In 2018 he was elected member of the Academia Europaea.