Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Landmark Cases in the Law of Contract [Kietas viršelis]

4.00/5 (1 ratings by Goodreads)
Edited by (University College London, UK), Edited by (University College London, UK)
  • Formatas: Hardback, 394 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 234x156x31 mm, weight: 756 g
  • Serija: Landmark Cases
  • Išleidimo metai: 30-May-2008
  • Leidėjas: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1841137596
  • ISBN-13: 9781841137599
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Landmark Cases in the Law of ContractDidesnis paveikslėlis
  • Formatas: Hardback, 394 pages, aukštis x plotis x storis: 234x156x31 mm, weight: 756 g
  • Serija: Landmark Cases
  • Išleidimo metai: 30-May-2008
  • Leidėjas: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1841137596
  • ISBN-13: 9781841137599
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Pastovi nuoroda: https://www.kriso.lt/db/9781841137599.html
Raktažodžiai:
Landmark Cases in the Law of Contract offers 12 original essays by leading UK contract scholars. As with the essays in the companion volume, Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution (Hart, 2006), each essay takes as its focus a particular leading UK case and analyzes that case in its historical or theoretical context. The cases range from the early 18th- to the late 20th- centuries, and they deal with an array of contractual doctrines. Some of the essays call for a case to be stripped of its landmark status, while others essays argue that a case has more to offer than previously appreciated. The particular historical context of these landmark UK cases often shows that current assumptions about the cases, and what they stands for, are either mistaken or require radical modification. The book also explores several common themes which are fundamental to the development of the law of contract - the influence of commercial expectations, appeals to 'reason,' and the significance of particular judicial ideologies and techniques.

Landmark Cases in the Law of Contract offers twelve original essays by leading contract scholars. As with the essays in the companion volume, Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution (Hart, 2006) each essay takes as its focus a particular leading case, and analyses that case in its historical or theoretical context. The cases range from the early eighteenth- to the late twentieth-centuries, and deal with an array of contractual doctrines. Some of the essays call for their case to be stripped of its landmark status, whilst others argue that it has more to offer than we have previously appreciated. The particular historical context of these landmark cases, as revealed by the authors, often shows that our current assumptions about the case and what it stands for are either mistaken, or require radical modification. The book also explores several common themes which are fundamental to the development of the law of contract: for instance, the influence of commercial expectations, appeals to 'reason' and the significance of particular judicial ideologies and techniques.

In this book leading scholars focus on leading cases, and analyse that case in its historical or theoretical context.

Recenzijos

The work presents a refreshing take on the cases examined. Anthony Lo Surdo Australian Banking and Finance Law Bulletin October 2008 Landmark Cases in the Law of Contract is a worthwhile collection of essays to have in any library, private or public...one is kept in suspense over the nature of the essay about to be encountered, and the delightful spread ranges from the historical to the doctrinal to the theoretical-more than enough to satisfy anyone interested in the law of contract generally or specifically. Goh Yihan Singapore Journal of Legal Studies July 2009 ...the particular interest of the essays lies in the background historical, legal, economic and social material which the authors uncover. That a case is a landmark would, one might think, mean that it had received so much attention that there is not much new to say about it. But this is far from being so, and the fascinating background material provided in the book is almost always an intriguing pleasure to read. David Campbell Journal of Legal History

1 Coggs v Barnard (1703) DAVID IBBETSON 2 Pillans v Van Mierop (1765)
GERARD MCMEEL 3 Carter v Boehm (1766) STEPHEN WATTERSON 4 Da Costa v Jones
(1778) WARREN SWAIN 5 Hochster v De La Tour (1853) PAUL MITCHELL 6 Taylor
v Caldwell (1863) CATHARINE MACMILLAN 7 Smith v Hughes (1871) JOHN
PHILLIPS 8 Foakes v Beer (1884) MICHAEL LOBBAN 9 Hongkong Fir Shipping Co v
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd, The Hongkong Fir (1961) DONAL NOLAN 10 Suisse
Atlantique Societe d'Armament SA v NV Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale (1966)
ROGER BROWNSWORD 11 Reardon Smith Lines Ltd v Yngvar Hansen-Tangen, The Diana
Prosperity (1976) MICHAEL BRIDGE 12 Johnson v Agnew (1979) CHARLES
MITCHELL
Charles Mitchell is a Professor of Law at King's College London. He writes widely on the law of trusts and the law of obligations, and his recent publications include Underhill and Hayton's Law Relating to Trusts and Trustees (17th edn, 2006) (co-authored with David Hayton and Paul Matthews) and Subrogation: Law and Practice (2007) (co-authored with Stephen Watterson). Paul Mitchell is a Reader in Law at King's College London and the author of The Making of the Modern Law of Defamation (Hart, 2005). Together they co-edited Landmark Cases in the Law of Restitution (Hart, 2006).