Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

El. knyga: Limits of Judicialization: From Progress to Backlash in Latin America

Edited by (University of Texas, Austin), Edited by (University of Oxford), Edited by
  • Formatas: EPUB+DRM
  • Išleidimo metai: 25-Aug-2022
  • Leidėjas: Cambridge University Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781009103411
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Limits of Judicialization: From Progress to Backlash in Latin AmericaDidesnis paveikslėlis
  • Formatas: EPUB+DRM
  • Išleidimo metai: 25-Aug-2022
  • Leidėjas: Cambridge University Press
  • Kalba: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781009103411
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:

DRM apribojimai

  • Kopijuoti:

    neleidžiama

  • Spausdinti:

    neleidžiama

  • El. knygos naudojimas:

    Skaitmeninių teisių valdymas (DRM)
    Leidykla pateikė šią knygą šifruota forma, o tai reiškia, kad norint ją atrakinti ir perskaityti reikia įdiegti nemokamą programinę įrangą. Norint skaityti šią el. knygą, turite susikurti Adobe ID . Daugiau informacijos  čia. El. knygą galima atsisiųsti į 6 įrenginius (vienas vartotojas su tuo pačiu Adobe ID).

    Reikalinga programinė įranga
    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą mobiliajame įrenginyje (telefone ar planšetiniame kompiuteryje), turite įdiegti šią nemokamą programėlę: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Norint skaityti šią el. knygą asmeniniame arba „Mac“ kompiuteryje, Jums reikalinga  Adobe Digital Editions “ (tai nemokama programa, specialiai sukurta el. knygoms. Tai nėra tas pats, kas „Adobe Reader“, kurią tikriausiai jau turite savo kompiuteryje.)

    Negalite skaityti šios el. knygos naudodami „Amazon Kindle“.

"This book brings together an interdisciplinary group of scholars to take stock of the role that law and courts have played and are playing today in Latin American politics. Beginning in the 1980s, Latin American courts, especially supreme and constitutional courts, left behind decades of subservience and irrelevance to become crucial political actors across the region. In the intervening decades, the law and legal institutions gained prominence as tools for social contestation and change. Like never before, judges entered the political maelstrom, serving as arbiters between the branches of government in heated debates over policy and the reach of presidential or legislative prerogatives. Working with prosecutors, courts also investigated corruption - not only, as in the past, the misdeeds of prior administrations but also those of people still in power. In the process, politicians began to realize that laws and constitutions perhaps meant mostly as window dressing were becoming more costly, as courts might actually hold them to the standards they were creating. Motivated by these developments, individuals and social movements turned the courts into battlegrounds for the realization and expansion of civil, political, cultural, and socio-economic rights"--

Recenzijos

The Limits of Judicialization pushes the boundaries of the field. It is a seminal contribution to the study of judicial politics in comparative perspective, and an essential read for anyone interested in courts in Latin America, including graduate students, scholars, and practitioners. It engages masterfully with existing research and opens new and fruitful avenues for future work in the region and beyond. Raul Sanchez-Urribarri, Senior Lecturer in Crime, Justice and Legal Studies, La Trobe University, Melbourne Illuminating how a 'superstructure of judicialization' propelled courts into politics in Latin America, this extraordinary volume examines the results, and indeed limitations, of judicial involvement in public policy and political disputes in the region. Through a rich cross-disciplinary, cross-regional dialogue, contributors' portraits reveal how institutional weakness and entrenched interests compromise courts' ability to enliven progressive promises and punish public misconduct. Diana Kapiszewski, Distinguished Associate Professor of Government, Georgetown University Constitutional reform across Latin America in the late 20th century created new judicial pathways for addressing social and institutional challenges at the heart of the democratization project. This essential collection of essays from leading scholars illuminates the political challenges that the region's courts inherited as they attempted to carry out their new roles as well as several unintended consequences of judicializing politics. Jeffrey K. Staton, Professor of Political Science, Emory University The Limits of Judicialization explains why the judicialization of politics failed to guarantee greater rights protection and signals key factors for understanding the role of courts in authoritarian regression. The combination of new empirical data and rigorous theory make this a particularly useful book for the classroom. Rachel Sieder, Senior Research Professor, Center for Research and Graduate Studies in Social Anthropology (CIESAS), Mexico City

Daugiau informacijos

Utilizing case studies of seven Latin American countries, this book reassesses the role of legal institutions in the politics of the region.
List of Figures
vii
List of Tables
ix
List of Contributors
xi
Acknowledgments xiii
1 Working in New Political Spaces: The Checkered History of Latin American Judicialization
1(38)
Sandra Botero
Daniel Brinks
Ezequiel Gonzalez-Ocantos
2 Critical Disconnects: Progressive Jurisprudence and Tenacious Impunity in Mexico
39(27)
Janice K. Gallagher
Jorge Contesse
3 When Winning in the Courts Is Not Enough: Abortion and the Limits of Legal Mobilization without Grassroots Involvement in Peru
66(23)
Camila Gianella
4 Forms of Countermovement and Counter-Reform in Latin America: Judicial Backlash or Resources and Political and Legal Opportunities?
89(26)
Alba Ruibal
5 Backlash against State-Strengthening Reforms: The Rise and Fall of the CICIG in Guatemala
115(24)
Rachel E. Bowen
6 Backlash against Corporate Accountability for Grave Human Rights Violations in Colombia
139(25)
Laura Bernal-Bermtidez
7 Courting Judicial Legitimacy: An Experimental Study of the Colombian Constitutional Court
164(31)
Sofia Forero-Alba
Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Raga
8 Family Ties and Nepotism in the Mexican Federal Judiciary
195(22)
Julio Rios-Figueroa
9 Judicial Corruption: The Constitutional Court of Ecuador in Comparative Perspective
217(25)
Santiago Basabe-Serrano
10 Kickbacks, Crackdown, and Backlash: Legal Accountability in the Lava Jato Investigation
242(24)
Luciano Da Ros
Matthew M. Taylor
11 Turning Corruption Trials into Political Tools in the Name of Transparency: The Lava Jato Case
266(23)
Mariana Mota Prado
Marta Rodriguez Machado
12 Fighting Corruption, Dismantling Democracy: Antagonism, Communication, and the Political Use of Lava Jato in Brazil
289(25)
Joao Guilherme Bastos dos Santos
Esther Solano Gallego
13 Prosecutorial Agency, Backlash and Resistance in the Peruvian
Chapter of Lava Jato
314(27)
Viviana Baraybar
Ezequiel Gonzalez-Ocantos
Index 341
Sandra Botero is Assistant Professor at Universidad del Rosario in Bogota. She specializes in studying the relationship between the judiciary and democracy, as well as electoral behavior, with a regional focus on Latin America. Daniel Brinks is Professor of Government and Law at the University of Texas, Austin. He is the author of multiple books, including The DNA of Constitutional Justice in Latin America (2018, with Abby Blass), which was awarded APSA's C. Herman Pritchett Prize for Best Book on Law and Courts, and Understanding Institutional Weakness: Power and Design in Latin American Institutions (2020, with Steve Levitsky and Maria Victoria Murillo). Ezequiel Gonzalez-Ocantos is Associate Professor of Political Science and Professorial Fellow of Nuffield College at the University of Oxford. He is the author of Shifting Legal Visions: Judicial Change and Human Rights Trials in Latin America (2016) and The Politics of Transitional Justice in Latin America: Power Norms and Capacity Building (2020).
Daugiau apie elektronines knygas Daugiau apie elektronines knygas
Pastovi nuoroda: https://www.kriso.lt/db/97810091034116e.html
Raktažodžiai: