| Introduction |
|
1 | (8) |
|
1 Trajectories of Proximity |
|
|
9 | (18) |
|
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Box 1.1 Dimensions of proximity |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
1.2 Functional proximity and relational proximity |
|
|
11 | (3) |
|
Box 1.2 Project-based communities |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
1.3 Diversified proximity and specialized proximity |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
1.4 Technical innovation and hybrid proximity |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
Box 1.3 Distributed systems |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
1.5 Social innovation and relational proximity |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
Box 1.4 Social Innovation |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
1.6 Cultural innovation and more-than-human proximity |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
Box 1.5 Systems of proximity and the web of life |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
|
23 | (4) |
|
|
|
27 | (32) |
|
2.1 The city of common goods |
|
|
27 | (4) |
|
Box 2.1 Common goods and community |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
2.2 The city of distances and its crisis |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
2.4 Everything in less than 15 minutes, but not only |
|
|
33 | (4) |
|
Example 1 Paris and the 15-minute city |
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
2.5 Functional proximity and "minimum ecological units" |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
Example 2 Barcelona and the superilles |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
2.6 Relational proximity, local networks, and cosmopolitism |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
Box 2.2 Cosmopolitan localism |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
2.7 The double link between functional and relational proximity |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
2.8 Encounters, meeting places, and the molecular dimension of the city |
|
|
46 | (3) |
|
Box 2.3 Anti-epidemic proxemics |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
2.9 Local communities, diversified proximity, and resilience |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
2.10 Streets, squares, common goods, and proximity |
|
|
51 | (8) |
|
Box 2.4 Remote work as a regenerative agent by Ivana Pais |
|
|
52 | (7) |
|
|
|
59 | (40) |
|
3.1 Care and proximity / Care is proximity |
|
|
60 | (3) |
|
Box 3.1 Being in contact without contact |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
3.2 Care is also care work |
|
|
63 | (4) |
|
Box 3.2 The nature of care work |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
|
67 | (3) |
|
3.4 Services that help collaborate |
|
|
70 | (5) |
|
Box 3.3 Capabilities and enabling systems |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
|
75 | (5) |
|
Example 3 The circle model for the construction of communities |
|
|
76 | (4) |
|
|
|
80 | (4) |
|
Example 4 Social Superilles and localization of services |
|
|
81 | (3) |
|
3.7 Care, communities, and hybrid proximities |
|
|
84 | (5) |
|
Example 5 Radars: a network of human sensors |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
Example 6 WeMi: a platform and many hybrid places |
|
|
87 | (2) |
|
3.8 Redistributing care work |
|
|
89 | (2) |
|
3.9 A new ecology of time |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
3.10 Density and economies of proximity |
|
|
92 | (7) |
|
4 Designing to Bring Close |
|
|
99 | (36) |
|
4.1 Technical and social infrastructure as platforms of opportunity |
|
|
100 | (3) |
|
4.2 From the city of distances to the city of proximity |
|
|
103 | (4) |
|
4.3 Stimuli and attractors of the social conversation |
|
|
107 | (3) |
|
4.4 Communities of place as an interweave of projects |
|
|
110 | (6) |
|
Example 7 North of Loreto, a neighboriiood as a project-based incubator |
|
|
110 | (6) |
|
|
|
4.5 Construction and regeneration |
|
|
116 | (6) |
|
Example 8 Collaborative living at maturity: the experience of the social housing foundation in Milan |
|
|
117 | (5) |
|
|
|
4.6 From the heroic phase to transformative normality |
|
|
122 | (4) |
|
4.7 Designing in proximity and for proximity |
|
|
126 | (2) |
|
4.8 Community, proximity, projects |
|
|
128 | (7) |
|
Box 4.1 Designing in complexity |
|
|
130 | (5) |
|
Proximate Future: Cities of Proximity and Digital Platforms |
|
|
135 | |
|
|
|
Defining the concept of digital platform |
|
|
136 | (3) |
|
Platforms of livable proximity and questions of governance |
|
|
139 | (3) |
|
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
The relational (but not only) dimension of digital platforms |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
|
|
144 | (4) |
|
Urban platforms and local roots |
|
|
148 | (3) |
|
|
|
151 | (3) |
|
Proximate future: platforms as new "local collective goods"? |
|
|
154 | |
