Atnaujinkite slapukų nuostatas

Macroeconomic Analysis in the Classical Tradition: The Impediments Of Keyness Influence [Minkštas viršelis]

  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 238 pages, aukštis x plotis: 234x156 mm, weight: 358 g, 6 Tables, black and white; 3 Illustrations, black and white
  • Serija: Routledge Studies in the History of Economics
  • Išleidimo metai: 26-Sep-2022
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 0367721937
  • ISBN-13: 9780367721930
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
  • Formatas: Paperback / softback, 238 pages, aukštis x plotis: 234x156 mm, weight: 358 g, 6 Tables, black and white; 3 Illustrations, black and white
  • Serija: Routledge Studies in the History of Economics
  • Išleidimo metai: 26-Sep-2022
  • Leidėjas: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 0367721937
  • ISBN-13: 9780367721930
Kitos knygos pagal šią temą:
Macroeconomic Analysis in the Classical Tradition explains how the influence of Keyness macroeconomics, including his changed definitions of some key macroeconomic concepts, has impeded many analysts ability to readily resolve disputes in modern macroeconomics.

Expanding on his earlier workMacroeconomics without the Errors of Keynes (2019)the author delves into more aspects of macroeconomic theory and argues for a revision of Keyness contribution to the field. Attention is given to theories and concepts such as Says Law, the quantity theory of money, the liquidity trap, the permanent income hypothesis, 100% money, and the Phillips curve analysis. The chapters work to build a careful critique of Keyness economics and make the case that the classical macroeconomics of Smith, Say, Ricardo, Mill, and others could help resolve present-day policy disagreements and redefine macroeconomic priorities.

This book provides essential reading for advanced students and scholars with an interest in the foundations of Keyness theories and current debates within macroeconomic policy.
(1) Introduction: The Pervasive Impediment of Keyness Influence in
Modern Macroeconomic Analysis  (2) Interpreting Says Law of Markets or
Outlets Correctly: The Impediments of Keyness Influence  (3) Could Keynes
have made a Legitimate Case against John Stuart Mills Statement of the Law
of Markets? An Illustration of Keyness Abiding Influence  (4) Saving and the
Relevant Ricardian Equivalence Theorem  (5) Milton Friedmans Permanent
Income Hypothesis: A Distraction from Keyness Misrepresentation of Saving as
Non-spending  (6) The Classical Heritage of Monetary Theory and Policy at
Chicago and Harvard before the Keynesian Conquest  (7) 100% Money: A Harmful
Proposal Appropriately Ignored  (8) Keyness Liquidity Trap is Impossible:
Classical Monetary Analysis Helps to Explain  (9) The Classical Roots of the
Phillips Curve Analysis  (10) The Future of Keynesian Economics: Struggling
to Sustain a Dimming Light  (11) Conclusion: Some Policy Implications of
Ridding Macroeconomics of Keyness Influence
James C. W. Ahiakpor is Emeritus Professor of Economics at California State University East Bay, Hayward, USA.